Abstract
This chapter describes commonalities and differences in the perception of surface texture by means of touch, vision, and audition. Texture is multidimensional, incorporating roughness, stickiness, hardness, or density, for example. Within the modality of touch, the duplex model proposes that roughness is mediated by different receptor populations, depending on the textural scale. Roughness can also be judged haptically by wielding a probe and sensing vibration. Studies of visual texture perception suggest that roughness is judged from cues signaling the protrusion and spatial distribution of surface elements. Few systematic differences are found between texture judgments based on vision vs. touch, although vision appears to be biased toward encoding geometric pattern descriptions and touch toward intensive cues. When both modalities are available, the relative weights appear to reflect long-term biases and immediate context. Auditory signals for texture, which result from mechanical interactions between an exploring effector and a surface, can modulate judgments of roughness based on touch. Evidence is lacking, however, for integration of auditory and haptic cues to roughness, particularly early in perceptual processing. Measures of brain activation indicate that distinct loci for vision and touch predominate, but some brain regions are responsive to both modalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1991) The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In: Landy MS, Movshon JA (eds) Computational models of visual processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–20
Arnott SR, Cant JS, Dutton GN, Goodale MA (2008) Crinkling and crumpling: an auditory fMRI study of material properties. Neuroimage 43:368–378
Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers A (2006) Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychol 124:177–189
Bensmaïa SJ, Hollins M (2003) The vibrations of texture. Somatosens Mot Res 20:33–43
Bensmaïa SJ, Hollins M (2005) Pacinian representations of fine surface texture Percept Psychophys 67:842–854B
Bensmaïa SJ, Hollins M, Yau J (2005) Vibrotactile information in the Pacinian system: a psychophysical model. Percept Psychophys 67:828–841
Binns H (1936) Visual and tactual ‘judgement’ as illustrated in a practical experiment. Br J Psychol 27: 404–410
Björkman M (1967) Relations between intra-modal and cross-modal matching. Scand J Psychol 8:65–76
Blake DT, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO (1997) Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci 17:7480–7489
Burton H, MacLeod A-MK, Videen T, Raichle ME (1997) Multiple foci in parietal and frontal cortex activated by rubbing embossed grating patterns across fingerpads: a positron emission tomography study in humans. Cereb Cortex 7:3–17
Burton H, Abend NS, MacLeod AM, Sinclair RJ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME (1999) Tactile attention tasks enhance activation in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. Cereb Cortex 9:662–674
Cascio CJ, Sathian K (2001) Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness. J Neurosci 21:5289–5296
Chapman CE, Smith AM (2009) Tactile texture. In: Squire L (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 857–861
Connor CE, Hsiao SS, Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1990) Tactile rough-ness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J Neurosci 10:3823–3836
Connor CE, Johnson KO (1992) Neural coding of tactile texture: comparisons of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J Neurosci 12:3414–3426
Cooke T, Jäkel F, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2007) Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia 45(3):484–495
Cooke T, Kannengiesser S, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2006) Object feature validation using visual and haptic similarity ratings. ACM Trans Appl Percept 3(3):239–261
Drewing K, Ernst MO, Lederman SJ Klatzky RL (2004) Roughness and spatial density judgments on visual and haptic textures using virtual reality. Presented at Euro-Haptics Conference, Munich, Germany
Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429–433
Gamzu E, Ahissar E (2001) Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination. J Neurosci 21(18):7416–7427
Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Greenfield TC, Brunette KE (2005) Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: a multidimensional analysis. Somatosens Mot Res 22(3):127–140
Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, New York
Guest S, Catmur C, Lloyd D, Spence C (2002) Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Exp Brain Res 146:161–171
Guest S, Spence C (2003) Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of pilled fabric samples. Exp Brain Res 150:201–207
Johnson KO, Hsaio SS, Yoshioko T (2002) Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics. Neuroscientist 8:111–121
Jousmaki V, Hari R (1998) Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch. Curr Biol 8:R190
Harvey LO, Gervais MJ (1981) Internal representation of visual texture as the basis for the judgment of similarity. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 7(4):741–753
Heller MA (1982) Visual and tactual texture perception: intersensory cooperation. Percept Psychophys 31(4):339–344
Heller MA (1989) Texture perception in sighted and blind observers. Percept Psychophys 45(1):49–54
Ho Y-X, Landy MS, Maloney LT (2006) How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness. J Vis 6(5):8:634–648, http://journalofvision.org/6/5/8/, doi:10.1167/6.5.8
Hollins M, Bensmaïa S, Karlof K, Young F (2000) Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: evidence from multidimensional scaling. Percept Psychophys 62(8):1534–1544
Hollins M, Bensmaïa S, Risner SR (1998) The duplex theory of texture perception. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics, pp 115–120
Hollins M, Bensmaïa SJ, Washburn S (2001) Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosens Mot Res 18:253–262
Hollins M, Faldowski R, Rao S, Young F (1993) Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Percept Psychophys 54(6):697–705
Hollins M, Lorenz F, Seeger A, Taylor R (2005) Factors contributing to the integration of textural qualities: evidence from virtual surfaces. Somatosens Mot Res 22(3):193–206
Hollins M, Lorenz F, Harper D (2006) Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J Neurosci 26:5582–5588
Johnson KO, Hsiao SS Yoshioka T (2002) Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics. Neuroscientist 8:111–121
Julesz B (1984) A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends Neurosci 7:41–45
Julesz B, Bergen JR (1983) Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell Syst Tech J 62:1619–1645
Kastner S, De Weerd P, Ungerleider LG (2000) Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: a functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 83:2453–247
Kirchner E, van den Kieboom G-J, Njo L, Supèr R, Gottenbos R (2007) Observation of visual texture of metallic and pearlescent materials. Color Res Appl 32:256–266
Kitada R, Hashimoto T, Kochiyama T, Kito T, Okada T, Matsumura M, Lederman SJ, Sadata N (2005) Tactile estimation of the roughness of gratings yields a graded response in the human brain: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 25:90–100
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1999) Tactile roughness perception with a rigid link interposed between skin and surface Percept Psychophys 61:591–607
Klatzky RL, Lederman S (2008) Perceiving object properties through a rigid link. In: Lin M, Otaduy M (eds) Haptic rendering: foundations, algorithms, and applications. A K Peters, Ltd, Wellesley, MA, pp 7–19
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Hamilton C, Grindley M, Swendson RH (2003) Feeling textures through a probe: effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors. Percept Psychophys 65:613–631
Klatzky R, Lederman SJ, Reed C (1987) There’s more to touch than meets the eye: the salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J Exp Psychol: Gen 116(4):356–369
LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1991) Surface microgeometry: tactile perception and neural encoding. In: Franzen O, Westman J (eds) Information processing in the somatosensory system. Macmillan, London, pp 49–58
Landy MS, Graham N (2004) Visual perception of texture. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS (eds) The visual neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1106–1118
Ledberg A, O’Sullivan BT, Kinomura S, Roland PE (1995) Somatosensory activations of the parietal operculum of man. A PET study. Eur J Neurosci 7:1934–1941
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2004) Multisensory texture perception. In: Calvert E, Spence C, Stein B (eds) Handbook of multisensory processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 107–122
Lederman SJ (1974) Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: the touching process and effects of macro and microsurface structure. Percept Psychophys 16:385–395
Lederman SJ (1979) Auditory texture perception. Perception 8:93–103
Lederman SJ (1983) Tactual roughness perception: spatial and temporal determinants. Can J Psychol 37:498–511
Lederman SJ, Abbott SG (1981) Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 7:902–915
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Hamilton C, Grindley M (2000) Perceiving surface roughness through a probe: effects of applied force and probe diameter. Proc ASME Dyn Syst Contr Div DSC-vol. 69–2:1065–1071
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Morgan T, Hamilton C (2002) Integrating multimodal information about surface texture via a probe: relative contributions of haptic and touch-produced sound sources. 10th symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 97–104
Lederman SJ, Loomis JM, Williams D (1982) The role of vibration in tactual perception of roughness. Percept Psychophys 32:109–116
Lederman S, Summers C, Klatzky R (1996) Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: role of modality-encoding bias. Perception 25(8):983–998
Lederman SJ, Taylor MM (1972) Fingertip force surface geometry and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 12:401–408
Lederman SJ, Taylor MM (1972) Fingertip force surface geometry and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 12:401–408
Lederman SJ, Thorne G, Jones B (1986) Perception of texture by vision and touch: multidimensionality and intersensory integration. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 12:169–180
Meftah E-M, Belingard L, Chapman CE (2000) Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch. Exp Brain Res 132:351–361
Merabet LB, Hamilton R, Schlaug G, Swisher JD, Kiriakopoulos ET, Pitskel NB, Kauffman T, Pascual-Leone A (2008) Rapid and reversible recruitment of early visual cortex for touch. PLoS ONE 3(8):e3046. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003046
O’Sullivan BT, Roland PE, Kawashima R (1994) A PET study of somatosensory discrimination in man. Microgeometry versus macrogeometry. Eur J Neurosci 6:137–148
Pascual-Leone A, Hamilton R (2001) The metamodal organization of the brain. In: Casanova C, Ptito M (eds) Progress in brain research vol. 134, Chapter 27. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 1–19
Picard D, Dacremont C, Valentin D, Giboreau A (2003) Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychol 114(2):165–184
Plomp R, Steeneken HJ (1968) Interference between two simple tones. J Acoust Soc Am 43(4):883–884
Pont SC, Koenderink JJ (2005) Bidirectional texture contrast function. Int J Comp Vis 66:17–34
Rao AR, Lohse GL (1996) Towards a texture naming system: identifying relevant dimensions of texture. Vis Res 36(11):1649–1669
Rasch R, Plomp R (1999) The perception of musical tones. In: Deutsch D (ed) The psychology of music, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 89–112
Roland PE, O’Sullivan B, Kawashima R (1998) Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:3295–3300
Ross HE (1997) On the possible relations between discriminability and apparent magnitude. Br J Math Stat Psychol 50:187–203
Servos P, Lederman S, Wilson D, Gati J (2001) fMRI-derived cortical maps for haptic shape texture and hardness. Cogn Brain Res 12:307–313
Smith AM, Chapman E, Deslandes M, Langlais J-S, Thibodeau M-P (2002) Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness. Exp Brain Res 144: 211–223
Srinivasan MA, Whitehouse JM, LaMotte RH (1990) Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. J Neurophysiol 63:1323–1332
Stilla R, Sathian K (2008) Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture. Human Brain Map 29:1123–1138
Suzuki Y, Gyoba J, Sakamoto S (2008) Selective effects of auditory stimuli on tactile roughness perception. Brain Res 1242:87–94
Suzuki Y, Suzuki M, Gyoba J (2006) Effects of auditory feedback on tactile roughness perception. Tohoku Psychol Folia 65:45–56
Taylor MM, Lederman SJ (1975) Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: a model and the effect of friction. Percept Psychophys 17:23–36
Treisman A (1982) Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 8:194–214
Unger BJ (2008) Psychophysics of virtual texture perception. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-08-45, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Unger B, Hollis R, Klatzky R (2007) JND analysis of texture roughness perception using a magnetic levitation haptic device. Proceedings of the second joint eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 22–24 March 2007, pp 9–14
Unger B, Hollis R, Klatzky R (2008) The geometric model for perceived roughness applies to virtual textures. Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperator systems, 13–14 March 2008, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 3–10
Whitaker TA, Simões-Franklin C, Newell FN (2008) Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture? Brain Res 1242:59–72
Yoshioka T, Bensmaïa SJ, Craig JC, Hsiao SS (2007) Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration. Somatosens Mot Res 24(1–2):53–70
Zampini M, Spence C (2004) The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J Sens Stud 19:347–363
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J. (2010). Multisensory Texture Perception. In: Kaiser, J., Naumer, M. (eds) Multisensory Object Perception in the Primate Brain. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5615-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5615-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5614-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5615-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)