Skip to main content

Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia: Bringing Motivation into the Conversation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 28))

Abstract

Despite its popularity in the classroom, hypermedia learning is challenging, as empirical research has shown. The inherent design of the hypermedia structure requires students to engage in a variety of metacognitive monitoring processes, which provides feedback that facilitates the process of adaptation during learning. The Self-Regulated Learning Theory (SRL) has provided a theoretical lens to examine these processes during hypermedia learning. While a myriad of theoretical approaches to SRL exist, the Information Processing model has been widely used in the context of hypermedia learning. This article outlines the contributions of this theory to field of hypermedia learning, while also highlighting the need for additional empirical research that systematically considers theoretically-grounded constructs of motivation within SRL. The premise of this chapter is that motivation offers a potential explanation of individual differences in how students respond to negative feedback loops during hypermedia learning. Methodological and theoretical challenges are examined, including the identification of specific motivation constructs (e.g., outcome expectations, incentives, efficacy expectations, attributions, and utility) that align with existing SRL theoretical frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Automated, unobtrusive, action-by-action assessment of self-regulation during learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1987). Methodologies for studying human knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 467–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2007). Understanding the complex nature of self-regulated learning processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: An introduction. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2/3), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 127–156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, methodological, and analytical challenges in the research on metacognition and self-regulation: A commentary. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. C. (2008). Why is externally-regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Witherspoon, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes used during hypermedia learning: Theoretical, conceptual, and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Witherspoon, A. M. (2009). Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 319–339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with MetaCognitive tools. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Computers, cognition, and collaboration in education (pp. 225–247). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Baker, R. S. J., Rodrigo, M. T., & Xolocotzin, U. E. (2007). The dynamics of affective transitions in simulation problem-solving environments. In A. C. Paiva, R. Prada, & R. W. Picard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 666–677). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, J., & Magun-Jackson, S. (2009). Approach-avoidance motivation and metacognition self-regulation: The role of need for achievement and fear of failure. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 459–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, J. M., Magun-Jackson, S., & Joseph, R. (2010). Dispositional approach-avoidance achievement motivation and cognitive self-regulated learning: The mediation of achievement goals. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. (1998). The nature and development of decision making: A self-regulation model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F. P. C. M. (1992). Independent learning: Regulation of the learning process and learning to regulate: a process approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Brabant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (1993). Searching for information. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(2), 127–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eflides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. R. Hoffman, & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1994). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisitions of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., & Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers in Education, 54, 230–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 269–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (2008). A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: Theory, research, and learning emerging scientific conceptual perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keleman, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C. (2009). Note-taking while learning with hypermedia: Cognitive and motivational considerations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1120–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: Too much of a good thing? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(1), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C. (2011). Self-regulated learning and externally generated feedback with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 261–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36, 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008c). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1686–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: To what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia? Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, L. (2010). Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Alexander, P. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). The manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Tech. Rep. No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Heine, A., Thaler, V., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., et al. (2008). A validation of eye movement as a measure of elementary schools children’s developing number sense. Cognitive Development, 23(3), 424–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 605–620). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukman, K. B. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognition and their connections with cognitive development in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 12(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E. (1987). LASSI user’s manual. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. (2005). Key issues on modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 232–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon, A., Azevedo, R., & D’Mello, S. (2008). The dynamics of self-regulatory processes within self- and externally-regulated learning episodes. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 5091) (pp. 260–269). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Moos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moos, D.C., Stewart, C.A. (2013). Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia: Bringing Motivation into the Conversation. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics