Advertisement

Research on Self-Regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments: Two Examples from Europe

  • Roberto Carneiro
  • Karl Steffens
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 28)

Abstract

Digital technologies have entered almost all spheres of our lives and they are believed to be the motor of innovation in our societies. While these technologies offer an almost unlimited access to information and a wide variety of tools for information processing and communication, it has also become clear that managing these resources requires a new kind of literacy, digital literacy, and that part of this digital literacy is the capacity to regulate one’s own learning.

Keywords

Digital Technology European Council Metacognitive Skill Digital Literacy Metacognitive Monitoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banyard, P., Underwood, J., & Twiner, A. (2006). Do enhanced communication technologies inhibit or facilitate self-regulated learning? European Journal of Education, 41(34), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartolomé, A., Beishuizen, J., Carneiro, R., Hansen, C., Lefrere, P., Lenné, D., et al. (2007). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European review. http://www.telearn.org/open-archive/browse?resource=1603_v1. Retrieved 29 December, 2010.
  7. Bartolomé, A., Bergamin, P., Persico, D., Steffens, K., & Underwood, J. (Eds.). (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: Problems and promises. Proceedings of the STELLAR-TACONET Conference, Barcelona, Oct. 1, 2010. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  8. Beishuizen, J., Carneiro, R., & Steffens, K. (2007). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: Individual learning and communities of learners. Proceedings of the Kaleidoscope-Taconet conference Amsterdam. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  9. Beishuizen, J., & Steffens, K. (2011). A conceptual framework for research on technology enhanced learning. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Beishuizen, J., van Boxel, P., Banyard, P., Twiner, A., Vermeij, H., & Underwood, J. (2006). The introduction of portfolios in higher education: a comparative study in the UK and the Netherlands. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carneiro, R. (2006). Motivating school teachers to learn: Can ICT add value? European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carneiro, R. (Ed.). (2010). New opportunities—How Portugal catches-up with adult qualifications: What research tells us. CEPCEP, UCP: Lisboa.Google Scholar
  13. Carneiro, R., Lefrere, P., Steffens, K., & Underwood, J. (Eds.). (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Carneiro, R., & Steffens, K. (2006). Self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: Studies in European higher education. Editorial. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 345–352.Google Scholar
  15. Carneiro, R., Steffens, K., & Underwood, J. (Eds.). (2005). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments. Proceedings of the TACONET Conference in Lisbon, Sept.23. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  16. Christiansen, E., & Nyvang, T. (2006). Understanding the adoption of TELEs—The importance of management. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delors, J., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  18. Dettori, G., Giannetti, T., & Persico, D. (2006). SRL in online cooperative learning: Implications for pre-service teacher training. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 379–414.Google Scholar
  19. EAEAC. (n.d.). About lifelong learning programme. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/about_llp/about_llp_en.php. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  20. eLearningeuropa. (n.d.). DOSSIER: eLearning programme 2000–2006: The Legacy. http://www.elearningeuropa.info/directory/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=17521&doclng=6. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  21. European Commission. (2000). e-Learning—Designing tomorrow’s education. http://ec.europa.eu/education/archive/elearning/comen.pdf. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  22. European Commission. (2001). The eLearning action plan, Designing tomorrow’s education. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/other/c11050_en.htm. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  23. European Commission. (2002a). Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the council adopting a multi-annual programme (2004–2006) for the effective integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/education/archive/elearning/doc/dec_en.pdf. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  24. European Commission. (2002b). The sixth framework programme in brief. http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/pdf/fp6-in-brief_en.pdf. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  25. European Commission Research. (n.d.). What is FP7? The basics. http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/understanding/fp7inbrief/what-is_en.html. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  26. European Council. (1996). Council resolution of 6 May 1996 relating to educational multimedia software in the fields of education and training. Official Journal C 195, 6 July 1996, http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/other/c11031_en.htm. Retrieved 28 December, 2010.
  27. European Council. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF. Retrieved 11 April, 2010.
  28. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liz, C., Machado, M., & Portugal, J. (2010). Brand modelling the citizen perception of a Public Policy. In R. Carneiro (Ed.), New opportunities—How Portugal catches-up with adult qualifications: what research tells us. Lisboa: CEPCEP, UCP.Google Scholar
  30. Lopes, H. (2010). Discussing new opportunities inside S-D Logic. In R. Carneiro (Ed.), New opportunities—How Portugal catches-up with adult qualifications: what research tells us. Lisboa: CEPCEP, UCP.Google Scholar
  31. Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: The case of writing partner. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 179–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Steffens, K. (2006). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steffens, K. (2011). Can schools produce lifelong learners? In R. Carneiro (Ed.). (2012). New learning and educational innovation: The role of Information and Communication Technologies. São Paulo: Vanguarda Educação Editora.Google Scholar
  34. Trigano, P. (2006). Self-regulated learning in a TELE at the Université de Technologie de Compiègne: An analysis from multiple perspectives. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valente, A. (2010). Bringing lifelong learning into low skilled adults’ life. In R. Carneiro (Ed.), New opportunities—How Portugal catches-up with adult qualifications: what research tells us. Lisboa: CEPCEP, UCP.Google Scholar
  36. Willem, C., Aiello, M., & Bartolomé, A. (2006). Self-regulated learning and new literacies: An experience at the University of Barcelona. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 437–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. A. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998a). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: an analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  39. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998b). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–25). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zimmerman, B. J., & Tsikalis, K. E. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Distance LearningUniversidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Didactics and Educational ResearchUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations