Abstract
The ACT project is an ongoing collaboration among learning, cognitive, computing and biological scientists at Georgia Institute of Technology and Rutgers University, focusing on learning functional models of ecosystems in middle school science. In particular, ACT (for Aquarium Construction Toolkit) is an interactive learning environment for stimulating and scaffolding construction of Structure-Behavior-Function (SBF) models to reason about classroom aquaria. Initial results from deployment of ACT in several classrooms with a few hundred middle school children indicate statistically significant improvement in identification of the structure, behaviors and functions of classroom aquaria as well as appropriation of SBF modeling by some middle school teachers for modeling other natural systems. In this article, we summarize and review the main results from ACT on learning about SBF models of ecosystems in middle school science and describe self-regulated learning in ACT, while also looking ahead and outlining the design of a metacognitive ACT toolkit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2004) (pp. 227–239). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Aleven, V., Stalh, E., Schworm, S., Ficher, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320.
Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments at metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193–197.
Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87–111.
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.
Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1997). Learning generic mechanisms for innovative design adaptation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 367–396.
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., & Vye, N. (2005). Learning by teaching: A New agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3–4), 363–392.
Chandrasekaran, B. (1994). Functional representations and causal processes. In M. Yovits (Ed.), Advances in computers (pp. 73–143). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Clement, J. (2008). Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dawes, J. (2000). Tropical aquarium fish: A step by step guide to setting up and maintaining a freshwater or marine aquarium. Sterling publishing, New York City.
Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations from research and implementation. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publications.
Edelson, D. (1997). Realizing authentic scientific learning through the adaptation of scientific practice. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Erden, M., Komoto, H., van Beek, T., D’Amelio, V., Echavarria, E., & Tomiyama, T. (2008). A review of function modeling: Approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 22(2), 147–169.
Gilbert, J. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.
Goel, A., Gomez, A., Grue, N., Murdock, W., Recker, M., & Govindaraj, T. (1996). Towards design learning environments—Explaining how devices work. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Cognitive Science Society, ACM, International Society of the learning Sciences, Montreal, Canada.
Goel, A., Rugaber, S., & Vattam, S. (2009). Structure, behavior and function of complex systems: The SBF modeling language. International Journal of AI in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23, 23–35. Special Issue on Developing and Using Engineering Ontologies.
Goel, A., Vattam, S., Rugaber, S., Joyner, D., Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan R, et al. (2010) Learning functional and causal abstractions of classroom Aquaria. In Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Springer, Cognitive Science Society, ACM, International Society of the learning Sciences, Portland, Oregon.
Hmelo, C., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298.
Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan, R., Honwad, S., Eberbach, C., Sinha, S., Goel, A, et al. (2011). Foregrounding behaviors and functions to promote ecosystem understanding. In Proceedings of 9th Hawaii International Conference on Education. London: Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C., Liu, L., Gray, S., Finkelstein, H., & Schwartz, R. (2007). Enacting things differently: Using NetLogo models to learn about complex systems. Paper presented at biennial meeting of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.
Honwad, S., Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., Gray, S., Sinha, S, et al. (2010). Connecting the visible to the invisible: Helping middle school children understand complex ecosystem processes. In Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Springer, Cognitive Science Society, ACM, International Society of the learning Sciences, Portland, Oregon.
Jordan, R., Gray, S., Demeter, M., Liu, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2009). An assessment of Students’ understanding of ecosystem concepts: Conflating ecological systems and cycles. Applied Environment Education and Communication: an International Journal, 8, 40–48.
Jordan, R., Singer, F., Vaughan, J., & Berkowitz, A. (2008). What should every citizen know about ecology? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 495–500. Ecological Society of America.
Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K., & Mizoguchi, R. (2002). A functional concept ontology and its application to automatic recognition of functional structures. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16(2), 145–163.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1023–1040.
Murdock, J. W., & Goel, A. (2001). Learning about constraints by reflection. In Procs. Fourteenth Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI-01). In Stroulia and S. Matwin (Eds.), LNAI 2056, (pp. 131–140). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Murdock, J. W., & Goel, A. (2003). Localizing planning with functional process models. In Procs. Thirteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS-03), (pp. 73–81). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
Murdock, J. W., & Goel, A. (2008). Meta-case-based reasoning: Self-improvement through self-understanding. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20(1), 1–36.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
New Jersey Department of Education. (2006). Core Curriculum Content Standards. In State of New Jersey Department of Education. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.state.nj.us/education/cccs/.
Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. New York: North-Holland.
Robbins, J., & Redmiles, D. (1999). Cognitive Support, UML Adherence, and XMI Interchange in Argo/UML. In Proceedings of Conference on Construction of Software Engineering Tools (CoSET 99) (pp. 61–70). Springer, Cognitive Science Society, ACM, International Society of the learning Sciences, Los Angeles, California.
Roschelle, J. (1996). Designing for cognitive communication: Epistemic Fidely or mediating collaborative inquiry. In D. Day & D. Kovacs (Eds.), Computer, communication and mental models. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Sabelli, N. (2006). Complexity, technology, science, and education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 5–9.
Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
Simon, H. (1999). Can there be a science of complex systems? In Y. Bar-Yam (Ed.), Unifying themes in complex systems (pp. 3–14). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Sinha, S., Gray, S., Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan, R., Honwad, S., Eberbach, C, et al. (2010). Appropriating conceptual representations: A case of transfer in a middle school science teacher. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Springer, Cognitive Science Society, ACM, International Society of the learning Sciences, Chicago. June 28–29, 2010.
Stadelman, P., & Finley, L. (2003). Tropical fish: setting up and taking care of aquariums made easy: Expert advice for new aquarists. Hauppauge, New York: Barron’s Educational Series.
Stansbury, E. (1999). The simplified classroom aquarium: A teacher’s guide to operating and maintaining a small classroom aquarium. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas publisher.
Stewart, J., Cartier, J., & Passmore, C. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How people learn. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Vattam, S., Goel, A., Rugaber, S., Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan, R., Gray, S., et al. (2011). Understanding complex natural systems by articulating structure-behavior-function models. Special issue on Creative Design, 14(1), 166–181.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL.
Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3–19.
Acknowledgments
This paper has benefited from discussions with Julia Svoboda. We also thank Steven Gray at Rutgers University for his contributions to early parts of this work. We are grateful to the United States National Science Foundation [Grant (#0632519)] and the United States Institute for Education Sciences (Grant #R305A090210) for their support of their work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goel, A.K. et al. (2013). Learning Functional Models of Aquaria: The ACT Project on Ecosystem Learning in Middle School Science. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5545-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5546-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)