Maternal Nutritional Status Dictates Neonatal Outcome

  • Supriya D. Mahajan
  • Shailini S. Singh


Maternal undernutrition, whether it occurs before conception or throughout gestation, may lead to physiological adaptations in the fetus that can contribute to adult cardiovascular and/or metabolic diseases. Anthropometric measurements are better nutritional predictors of pregnancy outcome than is dietary intake and the goal of anthropometric assessment in pregnancy is to provide an estimate of the prevalence and severity of malnutrition. Maternal nutritional status and fetal growth status can be assessed using a combination of anthropometric parameters, namely maternal weight, height, body mass index (BMI) calculated from the height and weight of the mother, feto-placental ratio (F/P ratio), skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference, abdominal circumference, and fundal height. Measurement of maternal weight gain during pregnancy and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI gives an indication of the short-term and long-term nutritional status of the mothers. Improving pre-pregnancy weight and weight gain during pregnancy are effective strategies to help reduce and prevent the incidence of low birth weight. Anthropometric reference charts are useful for both clinical and epidemiological studies and estimation of reference growth curves has traditionally relied on construction of several quantile curves based on information from samples of the reference populations. Recently, more flexible methods based on nonparametric quantile regression have provided a new approach to estimating reference growth curves and these methods compare favorably with traditional methods. We believe that gestational weight gain appropriate for BMI is one of the most important predictors of neonatal outcome as well for predicting postpartum obesity and related metabolic complications and must therefore be closely monitored as pregnancy advances. Anthropometric nutritional assessment has several public health implications and increased effort should be made by public health agencies to educate health-care providers as well as the general public about the importance of these simple measurements in facilitating a favorable neonatal outcome, particularly in high-risk women who have a moderately high or low pre-pregnancy BMI.


Quantile Regression Gestational Weight Gain Skinfold Thickness Maternal Weight Abdominal Circumference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.





Blood group system




Bio-electrical impedance analysis


Body mass index


Basic metabolic rate


Complete blood count


Feto-placental ratio


Follicle-stimulating hormone




Gestational diabetes mellitus


Human immunodeficiency virus


Intrauterine growth retardation/intrauterine growth retarded




Pounds LBW Low birth weight


Mid-upper arm circumference


Small for gestational age


  1. Abrams B, Carmichael S, Selvin S. Factors associated with the pattern of maternal weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:170–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson R, Bergstrom S. Maternal nutrition and socio-economic status as determinants of birthweight in chronically malnourished African women. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2:1080–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ay L, Kruithof CJ, Bakker R, Steegers EA, Witteman JC, Moll HA, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Hokken-Koelega AC, Jaddoe VW. Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth. BJOG. 2009;116:953–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker DJP. Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition. 1997;13:807–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker DJP, Bull AR, Osmond C, Simmonds SJ. Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. BMJ. 1991;301:259–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basso O, Nohr EA, Christensen K, Olsen J. Risk of twinning as a function of maternal height and body mass index. JAMA. 2004;291:1564–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertino E, Giuliani F, Occhi L, Spada E, DeCurtis M, Coscia A, Fabris C, Milani S. Benchmarking neonatal anthropometric charts published in the last decade. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Edition. 2009;94:F233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell DM, Campbell AJ, MacGillivray I. Maternal characteristics of women having twin pregnancies. J Biosoc Sci. 1974;6:463–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole TJ. Growth charts for both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Stat Med. 1994;13:2477–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly G, Naidoo C, Conroy RM, Byrne P, McKenna P. A new predictor of cephalopelvic disproportion? J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2003;23:27–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corney G, Seedburgh D, Thompson B, Campbell DM, MacGillivray I, Timlin D. Multiple and singleton pregnancy: differences between mothers as well as offspring. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1981;69A:107–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Onis M, Habicht JP. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:650–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32:77–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards A, Megrens A, Peek M, Wallace EM. Sexual origins of placental dysfunction. Lancet. 2000;355:203–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gigante DP, Rasmussen KM, Victora CG. Pregnancy increases BMI in adolescents of a population-based birth cohort. J Nutr. 2005;135:74–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Spencer HG, Bateson P. Environmental influences during development and their later consequences for health and disease: implications for the interpretation of empirical studies. Proc Biol Sci. 2005;7:671–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Ngai C, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. The accuracy of maternal anthropometry measurements as predictor for spontaneous preterm birth – a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119:11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Medicine. Recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy. Nutrition during pregnancy. Part I: weight gain; Part II: nutrient supplements. Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
  19. Johnson AA, Knight EM, Edwards CH, Oyemade UJ, Cole OJ, Westney OE, Westney LS, Laryea H, Jones S. Dietary intakes, anthropometric measurements and pregnancy outcomes. J Nutr. 1994;124:936S–42S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koenker, R. The R project for statistical computing. (2004).
  21. Krasovec K, Anderson MA. Maternal nutrition and pregnancy outcomes: anthropometric assessment. Publication No. 529. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization; 1991. p. 53.Google Scholar
  22. Kruger HS. Maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes: a proposal for the monitoring of pregnancy weight gain in outpatient clinics in South Africa. Curationis. 2005;Nov;28(4):40–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Luri S, Feinstein M, Mamet Y. Human fetal-placental weight ratio in normal singleton near-term pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48:155–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahajan SD, Aalinkeel R, Singh S, Shah P, Kochupillai N. Endocrine regulation in asymmetric intrauterine fetal growth retardation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;10:615–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahajan SD, Aalinkeel R, Singh S, Shah P, Kochupillai N. Pre-pregnancy weight and weight gain IN pregnancy are important determinants in the endocrine modulation of fetal growth restriction. J Turkish–German Gynecol Assoc. 2007;8:44–53.Google Scholar
  26. Neggers Y, Goldenberg RL. Some thoughts on body mass index, micronutrient intakes and pregnancy outcome. J Nutr. 2003;133:1737S–40S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogunyemi D, Hullett S, Leeper J, Risk A. Prepregnancy body mass index, weight gain during pregnancy, and perinatal outcome in a rural black population. J Matern Fetal Med. 1998;7:190–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Powers WF, Wampler NS. Further defining the risks confronting twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1522–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reddy UM, Branum AM, Klebanoff MA. Relationship of maternal body mass index and height to twinning. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:593–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sahu MT, Agarwal A, Das V, Pandey A. Impact of maternal body mass index on obstetric outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33:655–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thame M, Trotman H, Osmond C, Fletcher H, Antoine M. Body composition in pregnancies of adolescents and mature women and the relationship to birth anthropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:47–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Witter FR, Luke B. The effect of maternal height on birth weight and birth length. Early Hum Dev. 1991;25:181–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. World Health Organisation (WHO). Maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes. A WHO Collaborative Study. World Health Organisation Bull. 1995;73:1–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of MedicineBuffalo General Hospital, State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJoan C. Edwards School of MedicineHuntingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations