Abstract
The term digit ratio is often taken to mean the ratio of the lengths of the second and fourth digits (2D:4D). This ratio has been reported to show sex differences such that on average males have longer fourth digits relative to their second digit than do females. The sex difference in 2D:4D appears in the foetus as early as the ninth week, it is found in infants, children and adults, and the 2D:4D of infants is strongly correlated with their 2D:4D when they become adults. The sex difference results from a different male and female growth trajectory of 4D relative to 2D. It has been suggested that the sex dependent growth trajectory of 4D relative to 2D is the consequence of the effects of prenatal testosterone (PT) relative to prenatal estrogen (PE) on finger growth, such that high PT and low PE may result in low values of 2D:4D. Excluding the thumb, the fingers show six ratios and a number of these show sex differences. However, only 2D:4D, 2D:3D and 3D:4D show both sex differences and are relatively stable with growth in children. Therefore, 2D:4D, 2D:3D and 3D:4D are the most likely digit ratios to reflect levels of prenatal sex steroids. Diseases that show a sex difference in their expression may be influenced by PT and PE. Most work has concentrated on 2D:4D and its links to developmental disorders (e.g. autism, Asperger’s syndrome and ADHD), cardio-vascular disorders (e.g. MI), cardiovascular efficiency (e.g. running speed), and cancers (e.g. breast and cervical cancer). Further work is necessary to quantify the strength of such links in order to establish whether 2D:4D may be of predictive value for these diseases. In addition other links with such diseases as prostate cancer are likely to be investigated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAbbreviations
- 2D:
-
Second finger or digit, the ‘index finger’
- 3D:
-
Third finger or digit, the ‘middle finger’
- 4D:
-
Fourth finger or digit, the ‘ring finger’
- 5D:
-
Fifth finger or digit, the ‘little finger’
- 2D:4D:
-
The ratio between the length of 2D and 4D
- 2D:3D:
-
The ratio between the length of 2D and 3D
- 2D:5D:
-
The ratio between the length of 2D and 5D
- 3D:4D:
-
The ratio between the length of 3D and 4D
- 3D:5D:
-
The ratio between the length of 3D and 5D
- 4D:5D:
-
Ratio between the length of 4D and 5D
References
Allaway HC, Bloski TG, Pierson RA, Lujan ME. Am J Hum Biol. 2009;21:365–70.
Baker F. Am Anthrop. 1888;1:51–76.
Brabin L, Roberts SA, Farzareh F, Fairbrother E, Kitchener HC. Am J Hum Biol. 2008;20:337–41.
Brown WM, Hines M, Fane BA, Breedlove SM. Horm Behav. 2002;42:380–6.
Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:377–84.
Caswell N, Manning JT. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38:143–148.
Ciumas C, Hirschberg AL, Savic I. Cerebral Cort. 2009;19:1167–74.
De Bruin EI, Verheij F, Wiegman T, Ferdinand RF. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;43:160–4.
Fink B, Thanzami V, Seydel H, Manning JT. Am J Hum Biol. 2006;18:776–82.
Kratochvil L, Flegr J. Biol Lett. 2009; 5:643–46.
Malas MA, Dogan S, Evcil EH, Desdicioglu K. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:469–75.
Manning JT. Digit ratio: a pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2002.
Manning JT, Bundred PE. Brit J Cardiol. 2001;8:720–3.
Manning JT, Leinster SJ. The Breast. 2001;10:355–7.
Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. Hum Rep. 1998;13:3000–4.
Manning JT, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Sanders G. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:160–4.
Manning JT, Stewart A, Bundred PE. Early Hum Dev. 2004;80:161–8.
Manning JT, Fink B, Neave N, Caswell N. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34:329–33.
Manning JT, Churchill AJ, Peters M. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:223–33.
Martel MM. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;122:273–81.
McFadden D, Shubel E. Horm Behav. 2002;42:492–500.
McIntyre MH, Ellison PT, Lieberman DE, Demerath E, Towne B. Proc Roy Soc B. 2005;272:1473–9.
McMechan AP, O’Leary-Moore SK, Morrison SD, Hannigan JH. Dev Psychobiol. 2004;45:251–8.
Okten A, Kalyoncu M, Kalyoncu M, Yaris N. Early Hum Dev. 2002;70:47–54.
Peters M, Mackenzie K, Bryden P. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;117:209–17.
Romano M, Rubolini D, Martinelli R, Bonisoli AA, Saino N. Horm Behav. 2005;48:342–6.
Saino N, Rubolini D, Romano M, Boncoraglio G. Naturwissenschaften. 2007;94:207–12.
Talarovicova A, Krskova L, Blazecova J. Horm Behav. 2009; 55:235–39.
Trivers RL, Manning JT, Jacobson A. Horm Behav. 2006;49:150–6.
Voracek M, Dressler SG. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21:1329–31.
Williams JH, Greenhalgh KD, Manning JT. Early Hum Dev. 2003;72:57–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manning, J.T. (2012). Sex Differences and Age Changes in Digit Ratios: Implications for the Use of Digit Ratios in Medicine and Biology. In: Preedy, V. (eds) Handbook of Anthropometry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1787-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1788-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)