Three-Dimensional Facial Morphometry: From Anthropometry to Digital Morphology
Several basic and clinical disciplines are interested in the quantitative assessment of the dimensions of human facial soft-tissue structures (eyes, nose, mouth and lips, chin, ears), and of their reciprocal spatial positions and relative proportions. Anatomical and anthropometric descriptions, medical evaluations (genetics; maxillo-facial, plastic and esthetic surgery; dentistry), forensic medicine, they all need reference three-dimensional data collected on healthy, normal individuals selected for sex, age, ethnic group, to be compared to those obtained on the single patient. Data collection should be made non-invasively, rapidly, simply, directly on the subjects using low-cost instruments. All data should be digital, thus entering computerized data bases that can be used to visualize and simulate treatment. Currently, in clinical investigations and research classic direct anthropometry is being replaced with various three-dimensional image analyzers. Optical, non-contact digitizers (mainly, laser scanners and stereophotogrammetric devices) perform a fast digitization of the face, providing a detailed analysis of the soft-tissue surface. Contact instruments (electromagnetic and electromechanic digitizers) digitize discrete soft-tissue facial landmarks. Subsequently, landmark coordinates are used into mathematical and geometric models of the face, and angles, distances and ratios similar to those measured in conventional anthropometry can be obtained. Additionally, multivariate methods of analysis, obtained either from geometric morphometry or from other analytical methods, could be used. Overall, computerized instruments seem sufficiently reliable, simple and fast to be used also within clinical contexts, thus providing useful quantitative information to allow a better patient care, without submitting the subjects to potentially harmful procedures.
KeywordsCeliac Disease Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Facial Morphology Facial Reconstruction Facial Landmark
Computer aided design
Computer aided machinery
We are deeply indebted to all the subjects who served as volunteers in our laboratory. The precious work of staff and students, who helped in data collection and analysis, is also gratefully acknowledged.
- Fang S, McLaughlin J, Fang J, Huang J, Autti-Ramo I, Fagerlund A, Jacobson SW, Robinson LK, Hoyme HE, Mattson SN, Riley E, Zhou F, Ward R, Moore ES, Foroud T, Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Automated diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome using 3D facial image analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:162–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, Cuhìnha E, Cvicelova M, Davies S, Erasmus I, Gillet-Netting R, Hajnis K, Kemkes-Grottenthaler A, Khomyakova I, Kumi A, Kgamphe JS, Kayo-daigo N, Le T, Malinowski A, Negasheva M, Manolis S, Ogeturk M, Parvizead R, Rosing F, Sahu P, Sforza C, Sivkov S, Sultanova N, Tomazo-Ravnik T, Toth G, Uzun A, Yahia E. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/ races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;126:615–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer AR, See M, Nduka C. 3D stereophotogrammetry quantitative lip analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:497–504.Google Scholar
- Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Chaitidis D, Berg-Boerner I, Krol Z, Kovacs L, Schwenzer NF, Zimmerer S, Holberg C, Zeilhofer HF. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36:431–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sforza C, Ferrario VF. Soft-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: from anatomical landmarks to digital morphology in research, clinics and forensic anthropology. J Anthropol Sci. 2006;84:97–124.Google Scholar
- Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:477–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar