Use of Anthropometric Measures and Digital Human Modelling Tools for Product and Workplace Design

  • Lars Hanson
  • Dan Högberg


This chapter addresses and demonstrates the application of digital human modelling (DHM) tools to consider anthropometric diversity in product and workplace design. A number of additional methods for evaluating ergonomics conditions are also illustrated. Three cases show how DHM tools can be applied in different design settings and for different design undertakings, focusing on user variation in anthropometry. A number of methods for user representation in the DHM tool are briefly presented. Method selection depends on the design problem at hand, and the chapter exemplifies the use of different methods for different design tasks. Examples are the use of one-dimensional percentile based statistics data, the use of predefined collections of manikins, and the creation of representative cases by using multidimensional statistics. The chapter takes a designer’s view of the uses of DHM tools for anthropometry-related issues and illustrates how the tools can be of value in the design process.


Early Design Stage Adjustment Range Comfort Rating Biomechanical Load Wrist Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Computer-aided design


Computer-aided engineering


Digital human modelling


Hip point


Methods-time measurement


Principal component analysis


Product data management


Range of motion


Society of automotive engineers


Seating reference point


Task simulation builder


Universal serial bus


  1. Arjo. ARJO guidebook: for architects and planners. Eslöv: ArjoHuntleigh; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Bittner AC. A-CADRE: advanced family of manikins for workstation design. In: Proceedings of International Ergonomic Association Triennial Congress, San Diego; 2000. p. 774–7.Google Scholar
  3. Bubb H, Fritzsche F. A scientific perspective of digital human models: past, present, and future. In: Duffy VG, editor. Handbook of digital human modeling: research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. New York: CRC Press; 2009. p. 3.1–3.30.Google Scholar
  4. Bubb H, Engstler F, Fritzsche F, Mergl C, Sabbah O, Schaefer P, Zacher I. The development of RAMSIS in past and future as an example for the cooperation between industry and university. Int J Hum Factors Model Simul. 2006;1:140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiang J, Stephens A, Potvin J. Automotive manufacturing task analysis in Jack: an integrated approach. SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1897. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dainoff M, Gordon C, Robinette KM, Strauss M. Guidelines for using anthropometric data in product design. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Daniels GS. The average man? Technical Note WCRD 53-7. Dayton; Wright Air Development Center; 1952.Google Scholar
  8. Dey DK, Rothenberg E, Sundh V, Bosaeus I, Steen B. Height and body weight in elderly adults: a 21-year population study on secular trends and related factors in 70-year-olds. J Gerontol. 2001;56:780–4.Google Scholar
  9. Flügel B, Greil H, Sommer K. Anthropologischer atlas: grundlagen und daten 1986. Berlin: Verlag Tribüne; (in German).Google Scholar
  10. Hanson L, Blomé M, Dukic T, Högberg D. Guide and documentation system to support digital human modeling applications. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36:17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanson L, Sperling L, Gard G, Ipsen S, Vergara CO. Swedish anthropometrics for product and workplace design. Appl Ergon. 2009;40:797–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Högberg D, Bäckstrand G, Lämkull D, Hanson L, Örtengren R. Industrial customisation of digital human modelling tools. Int J Serv Op Info. 2008;3:53–70.Google Scholar
  13. Högberg D, Lundström D, Hanson L, Wårell M. Increasing functionality of DHM software by industry specific program features. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2288. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lämkull D, Berlin C, Örtengren R. Digital human modeling: Evaluation tools. In: Duffy VG, editor. Handbook of digital human modeling: research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. 2009. New York: CRC Press; p. 24.1–24.22.Google Scholar
  15. McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24:91–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raschke U, Kuhlmann H, Hollick M. On the design of a task based human simulation system. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2702. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Robinette KM, Hudson JA. Anthropometry. In: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 2006. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; p. 322–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roe RW. Occupant packaging. In: Peacock B, Karwowski W, editors. Automotive ergonomics. 1993. London: Taylor & Francis; p. 11–42.Google Scholar
  19. Schneider, LW, Reed MP, Roe RW, Manary MA, Flannagan CAC, Hubbard RP, Rupp GL. ASPECT: The next-­generation H-point machine and related vehicle and seat design and measurement tools. SAE Technical Paper 990962. 1999. Warrendale; Society of Automotive Engineers.Google Scholar
  20. Smith S, Norris B, Peebles L. Older adultdata – the handbook of measurements and capabilities of the older adult. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Speyer HJ. Ramsis – application guide: test sample & task definition. Kaiserslautern: Human Solutions GmbH; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Wells R, Mathiassen SE, Medbo L, Winkel J. Time - a key issue for musculoskeletal health and manufacturing. Appl Ergon. 2007;38:733–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson JR. Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Appl Ergo. 2000;31:557–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zehner GF, Meindl RS, Hudson JA. A multivariate anthropometric method for crew station design: abridged. AL-TR-1992-0164 32. Dayton: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base; 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virtual Systems Research CentreUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden

Personalised recommendations