Anthropometry in Ethnic Groups and Cultural and Geographical Diversity
The human ear is important not just for its aesthetic value and hearing ability, but also helps to confer normality to a newborn. Developmental abnormalities can result in abnormal ear shape and size. Descriptive examination must therefore be supplemented by objective anthropometric measurements, to aid a complete diagnosis profile. Ethnic and race variations are well known to have an impact on various anthropometric measurements. The ear is likely to be no different. However, comparisons of ear measurements in different ethnic groups have been difficult and rarely carried out. Differences in methodologies and definitions have also made comparisons of reported studies challenging. Nevertheless, just as gestation is an important consideration when making such measurements, so is the ethnicity of the baby. Ear length by convention is most often defined as the maximum length measured from the superior to the inferior aspect of the external ear. By and large, the Caucasian ear appears to have a marginal edge on the Asian ear, with the Israeli and Turkish babies registering the longest ears. The impact of even minor differences in ethnicity is further realized in seeing that even Chinese of different historical roots may have different measurements, with the Hong Kong Chinese ear being somewhat smaller than the Taiwanese and Singaporean Chinese ear. Also interestingly, the longest ear need not necessarily be the widest ear. Ear width is defined as the transverse distance from the palpable anterior base of the tragus through the external auditory canal to the margin of the helical rim at the widest point. For this, the Japanese ear is supreme. Another aspect would be the placement of the ear which changes as the child grows. The few studies that evaluated this aspect of the ear concurred that it was normal to have at least a third of the ear above the intercathial medial line across the eyes, with the Asian ear appearing to be somewhat higher placed than the Caucasian ear. Knowing the size, shape and position of the normal ear lends more weight to terms such as microtia (small ear), macrotia and low-set ears, allowing the practicing clinician to pinpoint abnormalities and effect investigations and interventions more accurately, reducing unneeded parental anxiety.
KeywordsExternal Auditory Canal Inferior Aspect Transverse Distance Interracial Marriage Superior Attachment
Intermedial canthial line
- Agnihotri G, Singh D. Craniofacial anthropometry in newborns and Infants. Iran J Pediatr. 2007;17:332–8.Google Scholar
- Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB. In: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 17th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p. 2135.Google Scholar
- Chou CT, Tseng YC, Tsai FJ, Lin CC, Liu CS, Peng CT, Tsai CH. Measurement of ear length in neonates, infants and preschool children in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Tw. 2001;43:40–2.Google Scholar
- Clark RD, Eteson DJ. In:Taeusch HW, Ballard RA, Avery ME, editors. Schaffer & Avery’s Diseases of the Newborn. 6th edn. Philadelphia:WB Saunders; p. 164, 177–8.Google Scholar
- Cortés MF, Guerrero MMV, Felices VP, Carrenard LJR, Sánchez MJ. [Anthropometric data on newborn infants: comparative study of two ethnic groups]. An Esp Pediatr. 1992;37:399–401.Google Scholar
- Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg. 2000;24:179–184.Google Scholar
- Feingold M, Bossert WH. Normal values for selected physical parameters: an aid to syndrome delineation. Birth Defectes Org Artic Ser. 1974;10:1–16.Google Scholar
- Fok TF, Hon KL, So HK, Wong E, Ng PC, Chang A, Lau J, Chow CB, Lee WH, the Hong Kong Neonatal Measurements Working Group. Normative Data of Penile Length for Term Chinese Newborns. Biol Neonate. 2005;87:242–5.Google Scholar
- Golalipour MJ, Haidari K, Jahanshahi M, Farahani RM. The shapes of head and face in normal male newborns in South-east of Caspian Sea (Iran-Gorgan). J Anat Soc India. 2003;52:28–31.Google Scholar
- Hall JG, Froster-Iskenius UG, Allanson JE. In: Handbook of normal physical measurements. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 162, 166.Google Scholar
- Jones KY. In: Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation. 6th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2006. p. 160–1, 280–1, 290–1, 646, 897–9.Google Scholar
- Lian WB, Cheng MS, Tiong IH, Yeo CL. Auricular anthropometry of newborns at the Singapore General Hospital. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37:83–9.Google Scholar
- MedicineNet.com. Webster’s New World Medical Dictionary. Low set ears. Available at: http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=4203. Accessed 7 May 2007.
- Melnick M, Myrianthopoulos NC, Paul NW. External ear malformations: epidemiology, genetics and natural history. Birth Defects Orig Artc Ser. 1979;15:1–1x, 1–140.Google Scholar
- Patil A. 2007. Malformations of the external ear. Available at: http://www.thefetus.net/page.php?id=205. Accessed 7 May 2007.
- Potter EL. A hereditary ear malformation transmitted through five generations. J Hered. 1937;28:255.Google Scholar
- Saitta SC, Zackai EH. In: Taeusch HW, Ballard RA, Gleason CA, editors. Avery’s diseases of the newborn. 8th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 197.Google Scholar
- Shimizu T, Salvador L, Allanson J, Hughes-Benzie R, Nimrod C. Ultrasonographic measurements of fetal ear. Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;80:381–4.Google Scholar