Skip to main content

Ultrasound-Guided Embryo Transfer (Abdominal/Vaginal): An Evidence-Based Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization

Abstract

The literature generally supports the use of ultrasound guidance to assist clinicians during embryo transfer. However, the exact mechanism(s) whereby ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates remains unclear. Several theories have been proposed including (1) confirming the position of the tip of the embryo transfer catheter within the uterine cavity, (2) accurately determining the site of embryo deposition, (3) increasing the frequency of “easy” embryo transfers, and (4) avoiding endometrial indentation. Nevertheless, some clinicians might argue that the actual benefit of using ultrasound during embryo transfer is the ability to visualize the pelvic structures in real time. Whatever the underlying mechanism, or criticism of the procedure, the overall conclusion is that with most clinicians, using ultrasound will significantly improve their patients’ pregnancy rates. Coupled with the fact that no study to date has shown any negative adverse events to the use of ultrasonographic guidance during embryo transfer, this technique has gained enormous popularity in the world of assisted reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Edwards RG. Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1995;10 Suppl 2:60–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1149–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet. 1976;1(7965):880–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer–can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1540–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abou-Setta AM, Al-Inany HG, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3114–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(4):678–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB, Yang V. Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(1):54–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leong M, Leung C, Tucker M, Wong C, Chan H. Ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3(6):383–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baba K, Ishihara O, Hayashi N, Saitoh M, Taya J, Kinoshita K. Three-dimensional ultrasound in embryo transfer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(4):372–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Woolcott R, Stanger J. Ultrasound tracking of the movement of embryo-associated air bubbles on standing after transfer. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2107–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kojima K, Nomiyama M, Kumamoto T, Matsumoto Y, Iwasaka T. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(12):2578–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1037–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1042–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abou-Setta AM, Mansour RT, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown JA, Buckingham K, Abou-Setta A, Buckett W. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD006107.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown J, Buckingham K, Abou-Setta AM, Buckett W. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD006107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang OS, Ng EH, So WW, Ho PC. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2310–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Abou-Setta MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abou-Setta, A.M. (2012). Ultrasound-Guided Embryo Transfer (Abdominal/Vaginal): An Evidence-Based Evaluation. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1780-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics