Skip to main content

Pronuclear Scoring in Human In Vitro Fertilization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization

Abstract

Historically, the introduction of pronuclear scoring was observational and from two different perspectives, even if the morphological features score resulted in the same outcome and conclusions. Pronuclear scoring involves descriptions of the nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) which are clearly visible spherical structures observed in the nuclei of the fertilized oocyte, or for that matter, in the nuclei of any actively dividing cells. The two scoring systems looked at the same parameters of the NPBs, namely, their alignment, number, and relative size in the newly formed male and female nucleus. These parameters were shown to be predictive of continued development and resultant outcome. In the 1999 model from Tesarik et al., the NPBs and their pattern were used as an indicator of sperm decondensation and function during ICSI cases. The model of Scott et al. described patterns of NPBs in the fertilized oocyte and how these changed, how they were related to a halo seen in the oocyte and the dynamic nature of fertilization, and how the patterns correlated with continued embryo viability. Pronuclear scoring is descriptive and based on NPB and nuclear morphology and accomplished at the time of fertilization check, which should be between 16 and 18 h postinsemination. Although descriptive, the patterns have a biological basis and are predictive of development based on cell cycle and structure and function of the nucleus and nucleolus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1003–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1318–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott L. Classification of pronuclei and polarity of the zygote: correlations with outcome. In: Patrizio P, Guelman V, Tucker M, editors. A color atlas for human assisted reproduction: laboratory and clinical insights. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott L. Morphological correlates of oocyte and embryo ­competence-identification. In: Van Blerkom J, editor. Hum Fertil. 2002;5:206–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scott L. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development. Biomed Online. 2003;6:57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scott L. The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:237–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott L, Finn A, et al. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:230–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ludwig M, Schopper B, et al. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(2):325–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott L. The origin of monozygotic twinning. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:276–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zollner U, Steck T. Pronuclear scoring. Time for international standardization. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:365–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borini A, Cattoli M, et al. Predictive factors for embryo ­implantation potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:653–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Senn A, Urner F, et al. Morphological scoring of human pronuclear zygotes for prediction of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C, Kattera S. Comparison of pronuclear zygote morphology and early cleavage status of zygotes as additional criteria in the selection of day 3 embryos: a randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:347–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine; ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leugn A, Lamond A. The dynamics of the nucleolus. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2003;13:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hernandez-Verdun D, Roussel P. Regulators of nucleolar functions. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 2003;5:301–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedersen T. Growth factors in the nucleolus? J Cell Biol. 1998;143:279–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goessens G. Nucleolar structure. Int Rev Cytol. 1984;87:107–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwarzacher H, Wachtler F. The nucleolus. Anat Embryol. 1993;188:515–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitri P, Corradini N, et al. The paradox of functional heterochromatin. Bioessays. 2005;27:29–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, et al. Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(2):341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Finn A, Scott L, et al. Sequential embryo scoring as a predictor of aneuploidy in poor-prognosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz P, Hinney B, et al. Oocyte-sperm interaction in the course of IVF: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guarente L. Link between aging and the nucleolus. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2449–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laurincik J, Maddox-Hyttel P. Nucleolar remodeling in nuclear transfer embryos. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;591:84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Svarcova O, Dinnyes A, et al. Nucleolar re-activation is delayed in mouse embryos cloned from two different cell lines. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76:132–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynette Scott PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, L. (2012). Pronuclear Scoring in Human In Vitro Fertilization. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1780-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics