Advertisement

Causal Mediation Analysis Using R

  • K. Imai
  • L. Keele
  • D. Tingley
  • T. Yamamoto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 196)

Abstract

Causal mediation analysis is widely used across many disciplines to investigate possible causal mechanisms. Such an analysis allows researchers to explore various causal pathways, going beyond the estimation of simple causal effects. Recently, Imai et al. (2008) [3] and Imai et al. (2009) [2] developed general algorithms to estimate causal mediation effects with the variety of data types that are often encountered in practice. The new algorithms can estimate causal mediation effects for linear and nonlinear relationships, with parametric and nonparametric models, with continuous and discrete mediators, and various types of outcome variables. In this paper, we show how to implement these algorithms in the statistical computing language R. Our easy-to-use software, mediation, takes advantage of the object-oriented programming nature of the R language and allows researchers to estimate causal mediation effects in a straightforward manner. Finally, mediation also implements sensitivity analyses which can be used to formally assess the robustness of findings to the potential violations of the key identifying assumption. After describing the basic structure of the software, we illustrate its use with several empirical examples.

Keywords

Quantile Regression Nonparametric Bootstrap Mediator Variable Semiparametric Regression Quantile Regression Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baron, R., Kenny, D.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(4), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D.: A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Tech. rep., Department of Politics, Princeton University (2009). Available at http://imai.princeton.edu/research/BaronKenny.html
  3. 3.
    Imai, K., Keele, L., Yamamoto, T.: Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Tech. rep., Department of Politics, Princeton University (2008). Available at http://imai.princeton.edu/research/mediation.html
  4. 4.
    Imai, K., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T.: Experimental identification of causal mechanisms. Tech. rep., Department of Politics, Princeton University (2009). Available at http://imai.princeton.edu/research/Design.html
  5. 5.
    Keele, L.: Semiparametric Regression for the Social Sciences. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    King, G., Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J.: Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44, 341–355 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koenker, R.: Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2009). URL http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
  9. 9.
    Rosenbaum, P.R.: Observational Studies, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vinokur, A., Schul, Y.: Mastery and inoculation against setbacks as active ingredients in the jobs intervention for the unemployed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65(5), 867–877 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood, S.: Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zellner, A.: An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 348–368 (1962)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations