Skip to main content

Imaging the Bariatric Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bariatric Endoscopy
  • 1299 Accesses

Abstract

Acquiring diagnostic medical images in bariatric patients may be challenging. Although adjustments can be made to currently available imaging equipment to accommodate larger patients, these adjustments come at an increased risk to the patient, with increasing doses of radiation, and risks to technologists who have to move, adjust, and properly position the patient. Understanding the limitations of the various studies, properly deciding on which imaging modality to use, and adjusting imaging protocols can help address many issues encountered when imaging the bariatric patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rundle RL. U.S.’s obesity woes put a strain on hospitals in unexpected ways. WSJ online edition. 2002. http://www.karlloren.com/diet/p6.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2010.

  2. Diconsiglio J. Hospitals equip to meet the bariatric challenge. Rising number of obese patients necessitates specific supplies. Mater Manag Health Care. 2006; 15(4):36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Medical care for obese patients: advice for health care professionals. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 65(1):81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, et al. Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports. Radiology. 2006;240:435–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, et al. Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(2): 433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uppot RN. Impact of obesity on radiology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(2):231–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uppot RN, Sheehan A, Seethamraju R. MRI hot topic: obesity and MR imaging. Malvern, PA: Siemens Medical Solutions; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S, Moro L, Narayan Y. Perceived physical stress at work and musculoskeletal discomfort in X-ray technologists. Ergonomics. 2004;47(2):189–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Personal communication Richard Benedikt, MD. March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choudry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, Tradup DJ, Beck RJ, Kofler JM, et al. Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics. 2000;20(4):1127–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, et al. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1203–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hann LE, Bach AM, Cramer LD, et al. Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173: 201–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vannier MW. MDCT of massively obese patients in Stanford radiology. Presented at the 8th annual international symposium on multidetector-row CT. Stanford (CA). 14–17 June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vannier MW, Johnson PJ, Dachman A, et al. Multidetector CT of massively obese patients. Presented at the 2005 meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Chicago (IL). 27 Nov–12 Dec, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yanch JC, Behrman RH, Hendricks MJ, McCall JH. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations. Radiology. 2009;252(1):128–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalra M, Schmidt B, Suess C, et al. Comparison of single and dual source 64 channel MDCT scanner for evaluation of large patients: a phantom study. Presented at the 2005 meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Chicago (IL). Nov 27–Dec 12, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guest AR, Helvie MA, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Bailey JE, Roubidoux MA. Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:805–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul N. Uppot M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uppot, R.N. (2013). Imaging the Bariatric Patient. In: Thompson, C. (eds) Bariatric Endoscopy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1710-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1710-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1709-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1710-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics