Abstract
Determination of the site and etiology of lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may lead to frustration for internists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, diagnostic, and interventional radiologists. The intermittent nature, variable severity, and changes in patient hemodynamic status can result in multiple rounds of diagnostic imaging without an answer. This is especially true in the setting of negative upper endoscopy and limited lower endoscopy due to the amount of blood within the colon. Despite significant blood loss, traditional diagnostic examinations such as tagged red cell scans may be negative or positive without definitive localization of the responsible site. Mesenteric angiography is the definitive imaging tool for localization of the bleeding site. This can, however, lend to confusion when multiple vascular lesions are identified without visible bleeding. With the addition of super-selective microcatheter embolization, angiography has become both diagnostic and therapeutic, and in many institutions, the first-line intervention for the management of lower GI bleeding. The main limitations of angiographic detection are the temporal relation of the arteriogram to the intermittent nature of the bleed, as well as the volume of bleeding. To help improve the sensitivity of angiography, practices have combined catheter-based delivery of pharmacologic agents with intermittent angiography in hopes of increasing the yield of angiography without compromising safety or efficacy. Now, known as provocative angiography, this technique has been applied to assess fore-, mid-, and hindgut bleeding that is refractory to traditional diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rösch J, Keller FS, Wawrukiewicz AS, Krippaehne WW and Dotter CT. Pharmaco-angiography in the diagnosis of recurrent massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 1982 Dec;145(3):615–619.
Koval G, Benner KG, Rösch J and Kozak BE. Aggressive angiographic diagnosis in acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Dig Dis Sci 1987 Mar;32(3):248–253.
Glickerman DJ, Kowdley KV and Rosch J. Urokinase in gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Radiology 1988 Aug;168(2):375–376.
Mernagh JR, O’Donovan N, Somers S, Gill G and Sridhar S. Use of heparin in the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Can Assoc Radiol J 2001 Aug;52(4):232–235.
Malden ES, Hicks ME, Royal HD, Aliperti G, Allen BT and Picus D. Recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding: use of thrombolysis with anticoagulation in diagnosis. Radiology 1998 Apr;207(1):147–151.
Bloomfeld RS, Smith TP, Schneider AM and Rockey DC. Provocative angiography in patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage of obscure origin. Am J Gastroenterol 2000 Oct;95(10):2807–2812.
Ryan JM, Key SM, Dumbleton SA and Smith TP. Nonlocalized lower gastrointestinal bleeding: provocative bleeding studies with intraarterial tPA, heparin, and tolazoline. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001 Nov;12(11):1273–1277.
Widlus DM and Salis AI. Reteplase provocative visceral arteriography. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007 Oct;41(9):830–833.
Glickerman DJ, Kowdley KV and Rosch J. Urokinase in gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Radiology 1988 Aug;168(2):375–376.
Shetzline MA, Suhocki P, Dash R and Rockey DC. Provocative angiography in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. South Med J 2000 Dec;93(12):1205–1208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patel, M.B., Kim, C.Y., Miller, M.J. (2010). Provocative Angiography. In: Pryor, A., Pappas, T., Branch, M. (eds) Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1693-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1693-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1692-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1693-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)