Basic Principles of MRI and MR Angiography

  • Frank R. Korosec


Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a very versatile and useful imaging modality. It is capable of providing a wealth of diagnostic information, including information regarding blood flow. Magnetic resonance methods that provide images of the arteries are referred to as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) methods. A variety of MRA methods exist. These methods can be categorized as noncontrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced methods. The noncontrast-enhanced methods rely on the motion of blood (phase-contrast MRA, time-of-flight (TOF) MRA) or the magnetic properties of blood (steady-state free precession MRA) to differentiate signals from blood and stationary tissues, whereas contrast-enhanced methods require the intravenous injection of a contrast material to differentiate signals from blood and stationary tissues.


Magnetic Resonance Angiography Transverse Magnetization Magnetic Field Gradient Stationary Tissue Longitudinal Magnetization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, Gibbs GF, Felmlee JP. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:955–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas SD, Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH. Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:479–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willinek WA, Born M, Simon B, Tschampa HJ, Krautmacher C, Gieseke J, Urbach H, Textor HJ, Schild HH. Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging-initial experience. Radiology. 2003;229:913–920.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leiner T, de Vries M, Hoogeveen R, Vasbinder GB, Lemaire E, van Engelshoven JM. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial experience with a whole-body scanner in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:609–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibbs GF, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, Riederer SJ, Brown RD Jr. Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:84–87.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edelstein WA, Hutchison JM, Johnson G, Redpath T. Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1980;25:751–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glover GH, Pauly JM. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1992;28:275–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1992;28:202–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barger AV, Block WF, Toropov Y, Grist TM, Mistretta CA.Time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thedens DR, Irarrazaval P, Sachs TS, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG. Fast magnetic resonance coronary angiography with a three-dimensional stack of spirals trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:1170–1179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG. Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:575–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macovski A. Noise in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:494–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:591–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, Roditi G, Lawton T, Reid A, Boesiger P. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:671–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202–1210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al.: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:877–881.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kroft LJ, de Roos A. Blood pool contrast agents for cardiovascular MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:395–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perreault P, Edelman MA, Baum RA, Yucel EK, Weisskoff RM, Shamsi K, Mohler ER 3rd. MR angiography with gadofosveset trisodium for peripheral vascular disease: phase II trial. Radiology. 2003;229:811–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Dawson P. Is there a causal relation between the administration of gadolinium based contrast media and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)? Clin Radiol. 2006;61:905–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zur Y, Wood ML, Neuringer LJ. Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady-state sequences. Magn Reson Med. 1991;21:251–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1999:455.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Du YP. Parker DL. Davis WL, Cao G. Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;4:733–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bernstein MA, Fain SB, Riederer SJ. Effect of windowing and zero-filled reconstruction of MRI data on spatial resolution and acquisition strategy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:270–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maki J, Prince M, Londy F, Chenevert T. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:642–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Earls J, Rofsky N, DeCorato D, et al. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology. 1996;201:705–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foo T, Saranathan M, Prince M, Chenevert T. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;203:275–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huston J, Fain S, Riederer S, et al. Carotid arteries: Maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptical centric view ordering. Radiology. 1999;211:265–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Y, Johnston D, Breen J, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:551–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Strecker R. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37:341–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Korosec F, Frayne R, Grist T, Mistretta C. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: Preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;208:447–451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, Tuithof HH, Engels H, Nelson RC, Gerety BM, Chezmar JL, den Boer JA. “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:671–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willinek WA, Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Urbach H, Hoogeveen R, Schild HH, Gieseke J. 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1455–1460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilman A, Riederer S, Huston J, et al. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:24–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huston J, Fain SB, Wald JT, Luetmer PH, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;218:138–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:599–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:683–692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Earls JP, DeSena S, Bluemke DA. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the entire aorta and iliac arteries with dynamic manual table translation. Radiology. 1998;209:844–849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;211:59–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keller PJ, Drayer BP, Fram EK, et al. MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display: work in progress. Radiology. 1989;173:527–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17:434–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pattany PM, Phillips JJ, Chiu LC, Lipcamon JD, et al. Motion artifact suppression technique (MAST) for MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:369–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Haacke E, Lenz G. Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1251–1258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1999:461.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Felmlee JP, Ehman RL. Spatial presaturation: a method for suppressing flow artifacts and improving depiction of vascular anatomy in MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;164:559–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Edelman RR, Atkinson DJ, Silver MS, et al. FRODO pulse sequences: a new means of eliminating motion flow, and wraparound artifacts. Radiology. 1988;166:231–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ehman RL, Felmlee JP. Flow artifact reduction in MRI: a review of the roles of gradient moment nulling and spatial presaturation. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:293–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ruggieri PM, Laub GA, Marsaryk TJ, et al. Intracranial circulation: pulse-sequence considerations in three-dimensional (volume) MR angiography. Radiology. 1989;171:785–791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmalbrock P, Yuan C, Chakeres DW, et al. Volume MR angiography: methods to achieve very short echo times. Radiology. 1990;175:861–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wolff SD and Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1989;10:135–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pike GB, Hu BS, Glover GH, Enzmann DR. Magnetization transfer time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1992;25:372–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Edelman RR, Ahn SS, Chien D, et al. Improved time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology. 1992;184:395–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nagele T, Klose U, Grodd W, Petersen D, et al. The effects of linearly increasing flip angles on 3D inflow MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:561–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Blatter DD, Parker DL, Robinson R. Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Radiology. 1991;179:805–811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Moran PR. A flow zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging. 1982;1:197–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dumoulin CL and Hart HR. Magnetic resonance angiography. Radiology. 1986;161:717–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hausman R, Lewin JS, Laub G. Phase-contrast MR angiography with reduced acquisition time: new concepts in sequence design. J Magn Reson. 1991;1:415–422.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dumoulin C, Souza S, Walker M, Wagle W. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1989;9:139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pernicone JR, Siebert JE, Potchen EJ, et al. Three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in the head and neck: preliminary report. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:167–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Korosec F and Turski P. Velocity and volume flow rate measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (review article). Int J Neuroradiology. 1997;3:293–318.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nayler GL, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:715–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, Enzmann DR. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q. 1991;7:229–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques (review article). Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2409–2418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1999:480.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Scheffler K, Hennig J. Is true FISP a gradient-echo or a spin-echo sequence? Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:395–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, and Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology. 2001;219:828–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital and ClinicsMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations