How to Improve Needle Visibility

  • Dmitri Souzdalnitski
  • Imanuel Lerman
  • Thomas M. Halaszynski


There are many advantages to the use of ultrasound in interventional pain medicine procedures. Ultrasound technology is currently growing exponentially due to its many advantages of improved and real-time high-resolution ultrasound imaging that results in successful pain management interventions. In addition, use of ultrasound for interventional pain management procedures avoids the many risks associated with radiation exposure to both the patient and practitioner.


Ultrasound Probe Ultrasound Beam Ultrasound Transducer Acoustic Beam Ultrasound Screen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Peng PW, Narouze S. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy, and procedures: part I: nonaxial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(5):458–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sites BD, Gallagher JD, Cravero J, Lundberg J, Blike G. The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29(6):544–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, Wiley CW, Bertrand ML, Blike GT. Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(2):107–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW, et al. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part II: a pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(5):419–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dessieux T, Estebe JP, Bloc S, Mercadal L, Ecoffey C. Evaluation of the learning curve of residents in localizing a phantom target with ultrasonography. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;27(10):797–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloc S, Mercadal L, Dessieux T, et al. The learning process of the hydrolocalization technique performed during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(4):421–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivani G, Ferrante FM. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound guided regional anesthesia: why do we need these guidelines? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(1):8–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennett S. Training guidelines for ultrasound: worldwide trends. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):363–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sites BD, Chan VW, Neal JM, et al. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(1):40–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pollard BA. New model for learning ultrasound-guided needle to target localization. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(4):360–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsui B, Dillane D, Pillay J, Walji A. Ultrasound imaging in cadavers: training in imaging for regional blockade at the trunk. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(2):105–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu D, Abbas S, Chan VW. Ultrasound phantom for hands-on practice. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30(6):593–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Geffen GJ, Mulder J, Gielen M, van Egmond J, Scheffer GJ, Bruhn J. A needle guidance device compared to free hand technique in an ultrasound-guided interventional task using a phantom. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):986–990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bruyn GA, Schmidt WA. How to perform ultrasound-guided injections. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23(2):269–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keegan B. Anthropomorphic phantoms and method. US Patent Application 2005/0202381. 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu Y, Magee D, Ratnalingam R, Kessel D. A training system for ultrasound-guided needle insertion procedures. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(pt 1):566–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Magee D, Zhu Y, Ratnalingam R, Gardner P, Kessel D. An augmented reality simulator for ultrasound guided needle placement training. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007;45(10):957–967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006575.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grottke O, Ntouba A, Ullrich S, et al. Virtual reality-based simulator for training in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(4):594–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ullrich S, Grottke O, Fried E, et al. An intersubject variable regional anesthesia simulator with a virtual patient architecture. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009;4(6):561–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Bale R, et al. Ultrasound-guided and CT-navigation-assisted periradicular and facet joint injections in the lumbar and cervical spine: a new teaching tool to recognize the sonoanatomic pattern. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(3):254–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matveevskii AS, Gravenstein N. Role of simulators, educational programs, and nontechnical skills in anesthesia resident selection, education, and competency assessment. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):167–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Phelan MP, Emerman C, Peacock WF, Karafa M, Colburn N, Buchanan K. Do echo-enhanced needles improve time to cannulate in a model of short-axis ultrasound-guided vascular access for a group of mostly inexperienced ultrasound users? Int J Emerg Med. 2009;2(3):167–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steadman RH. The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ national endorsement program for simulation centers. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):203–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Devito I, Bould MD, Naik V. Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(3):229–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(2):148–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW, et al. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part I: understanding the basic principles of ultrasound physics and machine operations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(5):412–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, McCulloch CE, Gray AT. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29(5):480–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Campos NA, Chiles JH, Plunkett AR. Ultrasound-guided cryoablation of genitofemoral nerve for chronic inguinal pain. Pain Physician. 2009;12(6):997–1000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liang P, Gao Y, Wang Y, Yu X, Yu D, Dong B. US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the spleen using 18-gauge versus 21-gauge needles. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(9):477–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan VW, Brull R. Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: challenges and solutions. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(6):532–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsui BC, Doyle K, Chu K, Pillay J, Dillane D. Case series: ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using a curvilinear probe in 104 day-case hand surgery patients. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(1):46–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nichols K, Wright LB, Spencer T, Culp WC. Changes in ultrasonographic echogenicity and visibility of needles with changes in angles of insonation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(12):1553–1557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Deam RK, Kluger R, Barrington MJ, McCutcheon CA. Investigation of a new echogenic needle for use with ultrasound peripheral nerve blocks. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35(4):582–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Simonetti F. A guided wave technique for needle biopsy under ultrasound guidance. Proc SPIE. 2009;7261:726118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Culp WC, McCowan TC, Goertzen TC, et al. Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled, and polymeric-coated needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(3):351–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Perrella RR, Kimme-Smith C, Tessler FN, Ragavendra N, Grant EG. A new electronically enhanced biopsy system: value in improving needle-tip visibility during sonographically guided interventional procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(1):195–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klein SM, Fronheiser MP, Reach J, Nielsen KC, Smith SW. Piezoelectric vibrating needle and catheter for enhancing ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(6):1858–1860. table of contents.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maecken T, Zenz M, Grau T. Ultrasound characteristics of needles for regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(5):440–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Takayama W, Yasumura R, Kaneko T, et al. Novel echogenic needle for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block “Hakko type CCR”. Masui. 2009;58(4):503–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Daoud MI, Lacefield JC. Distributed three-dimensional simulation of B-mode ultrasound imaging using a first-order k-space method. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(17):5173–5192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bertolotto M, Perrone R, Bucci S, Zappetti R, Coss M. Comparison of conventional ultrasound and real-time spatial compound imaging in evaluation of patients with severe Peyronie’s disease. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(5):596–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheung S, Rohling R. Enhancement of needle visibility in ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(5):617–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mesurolle B, Bining HJ, El Khoury M, Barhdadi A, Kao E. Contribution of tissue harmonic imaging and frequency compound imaging in interventional breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(7):845–855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brull R, Perlas A, Chan VW. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007;11(1):25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ricci S, Moro L, Antonel liIncalzi R. Ultrasound imaging of the sural nerve: ultrasound anatomy and rationale for investigation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(5):636–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yen CL, Jeng CM, Yang SS. The benefits of comparing conventional sonography, real-time spatial compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of hepatic lesions. Clin Imaging. 2008;32(1):11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cohnen M, Saleh A, Luthen R, Bode J, Modder U. Improvement of sonographic needle ­visibility in cirrhotic livers during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedures with use of real-time compound imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(1):103–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Clendenen SR, Riutort KT, Feinglass NG, Greengrass RA, Brull SJ. Real-time three-dimensional ultrasound for continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade. J Anesth. 2009;23(3):466–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kwak J, Andrawes M, Garvin S, D’Ambra MN. 3D transesophageal echocardiography: a review of recent literature 2007–2009. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(1):80–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    French JL, Raine-Fenning NJ, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(8):806–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hansen R, Masoy SE, Johansen TF, Angelsen BA. Utilizing dual frequency band transmit pulse complexes in medical ultrasound imaging. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127(1):579–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Huijssen J, Verweij MD. An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127(1):33–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Martinez-Graullera O, Martin CJ, Godoy G, Ullate LG. 2D array design based on Fermat spiral for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasonics. 2010;50(2):280–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Foster FS, Mehi J, Lukacs M, et al. A new 15–50 MHz array-based micro-ultrasound scanner for preclinical imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(10):1700–1708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gebauer B, Teichgraber UM, Werk M, Beck A, Wagner HJ. Sonographically guided venous puncture and fluoroscopically guided placement of tunneled, large-bore central venous catheters for bone marrow transplantation-high success rates and low complication rates. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(8):897–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Phee SJ, Yang K. Interventional navigation systems for treatment of unresectable liver tumor. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48(2):103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vaithilingam S, Ma TJ, Furukawa Y, et al. Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging using a two-dimensional CMUT array. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56(11):2411–2419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nelson BP, Melnick ER, Li J. Portable ultrasound for remote environments, part I: feasibility of field deployment. J Emerg Med. 2010 (In press). Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher J, et al. Regional anesthesia meets ultrasound: a specialty in transition. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(4):456–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Palmeri ML, Dahl JJ, MacLeod DB, Grant SA, Nightingale KR. On the feasibility of imaging peripheral nerves using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 2009;31(3):172–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Meir A, Rubinsky B. Distributed network, wireless and cloud computing enabled 3-D ultrasound: a new medical technology paradigm. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Linguraru MG, Vasilyev NV, Del Nido PJ, Howe RD. Statistical segmentation of surgical instruments in 3-D ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(9):1428–1437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Boctor EM, Choti MA, Burdette EC, Webster Iii RJ. Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided robotic needle placement: an experimental evaluation. Int J Med Robot. 2008;4(2):180–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Freschi C, Troia E, Ferrari V, Megali G, Pietrabissa A, Mosca F. Ultrasound guided robotic biopsy using augmented reality and human-robot cooperative control. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:5110–5113.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wood BJ, Locklin JK, Viswanathan A, et al. Technologies for guidance of radiofrequency ablation in the multimodality interventional suite of the future. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(1 pt 1):9–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hiraoka A, Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, et al. Modified technique for determining therapeutic response to radiofrequency ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using US-volume system. Oncol Rep. 2010;23(2):493–497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fredrickson M. “Oblique” needle-probe alignment to facilitate ultrasound-guided femoral catheter placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(4):383–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Phelan M, Hagerty D. The oblique view: an alternative approach for ultrasound-guided central line placement. J Emerg Med. 2009;37(4):403–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Phal PM, Brooks DM, Wolfe R. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(5):1652–1656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wang AZ, Zhang WX, Jiang W. A needle guide can facilitate visualization of needle passage in ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21(3):230–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Buonocore E, Skipper GJ. Steerable real-time sonographically guided needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(2):387–392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Tsui BC. Facilitating needle alignment in-plane to an ultrasound beam using a portable laser unit. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(1):84–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sites BD, Brull R. Ultrasound guidance in peripheral regional anesthesia: philosophy, evidence-based medicine, and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(6):630–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(4):493–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Levy EB, Tang J, Lindisch D, Glossop N, Banovac F, Cleary K. Implementation of an electromagnetic tracking system for accurate intrahepatic puncture needle guidance: accuracy results in an in vitro model. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(3):344–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Krucker J, Xu S, Glossop N, et al. Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(9):1141–1150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Glossop ND. Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(suppl 1):23–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Paltieli Y, Degani S, Zrayek A, et al. A new guidance system for freehand, obstetric ultrasound-guided procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):269–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Marhofer P, Chan VW. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(5):1265–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Molnar J. Regional anesthesia system and cart. US Patent 2009275892. 2009.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hickey K, Parashar A, Sites B, Spence BC. Biomedical positioning and stabilization system. US Patent 2007129634. 2007.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tsui BC. Dextrose 5% in water as an alternative medium to gel for performing ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(5):525–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, Beach ML. On the edge of the ultrasound screen: regional anesthesiologists diagnosing nonneural pathology. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31(6):555–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Faust AM, Fournier R. Color Doppler as a surrogate marker of needle-tip location in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(5):525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Greenleaf JF, Urban MW, Chen S. Measurement of tissue mechanical properties with shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:4411–4414.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Chung HH, Cha SH, Lee KY, Kim TK, Kim JH. Fluid infusion technique for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28(1):77–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bloc S, Ecoffey C, Dhonneur G. Controlling needle tip progression during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using the hydrolocalization technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(4):382–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Tsui BC, Kropelin B. The electrophysiological effect of dextrose 5% in water on single-shot peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(6):1837–1839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Tsui BC, Kropelin B, Ganapathy S, Finucane B. Dextrose 5% in water: fluid medium for maintaining electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves during stimulating catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(10):1562–1565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Dhir S, Ganapathy S. Use of ultrasound guidance and contrast enhancement: a study of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(3):338–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Swenson JD, Davis JJ, DeCou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ­ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):1015–1016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kang E, Min HS, Lee J, et al. Nanobubbles from gas-generating polymeric nanoparticles: ultrasound imaging of living subjects. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(3):524–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Chantzi C, Saranteas T, Paraskeuopoulos T, Dimitriou V. Ultrasound and transcutaneous neurostimulator combined technique as a training method for nerve identification in anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(4):365–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Dingemans E, Williams SR, Arcand G, et al. Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(5):1275–1280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Dufour E, Quennesson P, Van Robais AL, et al. Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance for popliteal sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison with neurostimulation alone. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1553–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Urbano J, Cannon M, Engle l. Integrated nerve stimulator and ultrasound imaging device. US Patent 2008119737. 2008.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    de Tran QH, Munoz L, Russo G, Finlayson RJ. Ultrasonography and stimulating perineural catheters for nerve blocks: a review of the evidence. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(7):447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Beach ML, Sites BD, Gallagher JD. Use of a nerve stimulator does not improve the efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(8):580–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Chan VW, Perlas A, McCartney CJ, Brull R, Xu D, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(3):176–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitri Souzdalnitski
    • 1
  • Imanuel Lerman
  • Thomas M. Halaszynski
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyYale New Haven HospitalNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations