A Distributed Procedure for IEEE 802.15.4 PAN Coordinator Election in Emergency Scenarios

  • Emanuele Cipollone
  • Francesca Cuomo
  • Anna Abbagnale
Conference paper

Abstract

In an emergency scenario, the presence of a reliable communication infrastructure is fundamental. In response to massive catastrophes, such as earthquakes, floods, fires, etc., public authorities are expected to undertake actions to control and limit damages for people and for buildings. To this end, security agents are dispatched to the emergency area and they need to communicate to the people from a remote centre and they are responsible for emergency management. In this context, the use of IEEE 802.15.4 wireless personal area networks (WPANs) to allow communications among security agents seems particularly appropriate, thanks to their characteristics of self-configurability, adaptability, scalability, and low cost. Moreover, this kind of network can be used, if necessary, in a pervasive mode for data collection in the emergency area. In this work, we present an algorithm to self-configure an IEEE 802.15.4 WPAN by electing, in a distributed manner, a suitable node for the WPAN coordination. Our approach achieves a reduction of the network depth and a better distribution of nodes at different levels of the network.

Keywords

Dispatch 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the IT-funded FIRB/PNR INSYEME (protocol number: RBIP063BPH).

A special thanks goes to Matteo Antonetti, for the support in the simulations.

References

  1. 1.
    Zheng J and Lee M (2004) Low rate wireless personal area networks for public security. In: IEEE 60th vehicular technology conference. VTC2004-Fall, vol 6. September 2004, pp 4568–4572Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbagnale A, Cipollone E, Cuomo F (2008) Constraining the network topology in IEEE 802.15.4. In: Annual Mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop, MED-HOC-NET ’08, 23–27 June 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang Q (2003) Designing power aware self-reconfiguring topology for mobile wireless personal area networks using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet C: Appl Rev 33(3):390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jung S, Chang A, Gerla M (2007) Comparisons of zigbee personal area network (pan) interconnection methods. In: 4th international symposium on wireless communication systems, ISWCS 2007, October 2007, pp 337–341Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobson S, Denazis S, Fernández A, Gaïti D, Gelenbe E, Massacci F, Nixon P, Saffre F, Schmidt N, Zambonelli F (2006) A survey of autonomic communications. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst 1(2):223–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (WPANs), IEEE Std. 802.15.4, 2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cuomo F, Luna SD, Monaco U, Melodia T (2007) Routing in ZigBee: benefits from exploiting the IEEE 802.15.4 association tree. In: IEEE international conference on communications 2007, IEEE ICC ’07, June 2007, pp 3271–3276Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuele Cipollone
    • 1
  • Francesca Cuomo
    • 1
  • Anna Abbagnale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of INFOCOMUniversity of Rome “Sapienza,”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations