The Delineation and Explication of Palliative Options of Last Resort
Palliative options of last resort have become a major focus of debates over improving care of the dying, particularly in the United States. This chapter will explore a broad spectrum of palliative measures that might be considered to be legitimate approaches to end-of-life pain and suffering, including high-dose opioid analgesia, palliative sedation, lethal prescription (where allowed by law), as well a brief discussion of voluntary active euthanasia (lethal injection). In reviewing palliative options of last resort, the chapter will address related considerations such as debates over proper terminology, the role of intent and causation in making moral judgments about palliative measures, including the Doctrine/Principle/Rule of Double Effect (hereinafter DDE), and the persistence of myths about the risks and benefits associated with palliative measures.
KeywordsPalliative Care Palliative Sedation Assisted Suicide Artificial Nutrition Palliative Measure
- American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Position Statements. (2010). Statement on palliative sedation. Approved by the Board of Directors September 15, 2006, Glenview, IL. Retrieved June 16, 2010, from http://www.aahpm.org/positions/sedation.html.
- American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. (2010). Sedation to unconsciousness in end-of-life care. CEJA report 5-A-08. Retrieved June 16, 2010, from http:www.ama.org/2201a.pdf.Google Scholar
- Baxter v. Montana. (2009). 224 P.3d 1211, 2009, WL 5155363 (Mont).Google Scholar
- Bergman v. Chin. (2001). No. H205732-1 (Alameda County Ct., June 13).Google Scholar
- Compassion in Dying v. Washington. (1994). 850 F. Supp. 1454 (W.D. Wash).Google Scholar
- Education for Physicians on End-of-Life Care. Trainer’s Guide, modol withholding, withdrawing therapy (1999). In: Emanuel LL, von Gunter CG, Ferris FD. EPEC project.http://www.epec.net/index.cfm
- Estate of Henry James v. Hillhaven Corporation. (1991). No. 89 CVS 64 (N.C. Super. Ct. January 15).Google Scholar
- Field, M. J., Cassel, C. K. (Eds.). (1998). Institute of Medicine. In Approaching death: improving care at the end of life. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Fishman, S. M. (2007). Responsible opioid prescribing: A physician’s guide. Dallas: Federation of State Medical Boards.Google Scholar
- Fox, E. (1997). Predominance of the Curative model of medical care – A Residual Problem. JAMA, 278, 761–763.Google Scholar
- Gonzales v. Oregon. (2006). 546 U.S. 243.Google Scholar
- Miles, S. H. (2004). The hippocratic oath and the ethics of medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Oregon Death With Dignity Act. (2010). Oregon revised statutes 127.505, et. Seq. Retrieved June 16, 2010, from http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/127.html.
- Oregon Department of Health Services. (2010). 2009 Summary of Oregon death with dignity act. Retrieved June 16, 2010, from http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/docs/year12.pdf.
- Rich, B. A. (2010). A patient’s guide to pain management. In T. Kushner (Ed.), Surviving health care (pp. 246–263). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson v. Bayberry Care Center, et al. (2002). No. C 02-00120, Superior Court, Contra Costa Co, CA.Google Scholar
- Vacco v. Quill. (1997). 521 U.S. 793.Google Scholar
- Washington v. Glucksberg. (1997). 521 U.S. 702.Google Scholar
- Woodward, P. A. (Ed.). (2001). The doctrine of double effect – Philosophers debate a controversial moral principle. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar