Quality

  • Formosa Chen
  • Hiroko Kunitake
  • Elise Lawson
  • Joan Ryoo
  • Clifford Y. Ko
Chapter

Abstract

This topic is an interesting one, in that much research has been performed in this area and much policy has been enacted to improve quality of care. While an entire set of textbooks could be written on quality of care, the aims of this chapter are more focused on perhaps what would be interesting and important to a colon and rectal surgeon.

Keywords

Catheter Ischemia Europe Constipation Cataract 

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn LTC, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    America CoQoHCi. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lohr KN. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance. J Qual Assur. 1991;13(1):10–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1001–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruth HS, Haugen FP, Grove DD. Anesthesia Study Commission; findings of 11 years’ activity. J Am Med Assoc. 1947;135(14):881–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraft S. The crises begin at birth. Los Angeles Times. November 15, 2009:A1, A24–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozgediz D, Galukande M, Mabweijano J, et al. The neglect of the global surgical workforce: experience and evidence from Uganda. World J Surg. 2008;32(6):1208–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakayama DK, Burd RS, Newman KD. Pediatric surgery ­workforce: supply and demand. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(9):1677–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Workload projections for surgical oncology: will we need more surgeons? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(9):1112–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams Jr TE, Ellison EC. Population analysis predicts a future critical shortage of general surgeons. Surgery. 2008;144(4):548–54. discussion 554–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohn SM, Price MA, Villarreal CL. Trauma and surgical ­critical care workforce in the United States: a severe surgeon shortage appears imminent. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(4):446–52. e444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grover A, Gorman K, Dall TM, et al. Shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons is likely by 2020. Circulation. 2009;120(6):488–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Satiani B, Williams TE, Go MR. Predicted shortage of vascular surgeons in the United States: population and workload analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(4):946–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dill MJS, Salsberg ES. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections through 2025. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Etzioni DA, Beart Jr RW, Madoff RD, Ault GT. Impact of the aging population on the demand for colorectal procedures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):583–90. discussion 590–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Voelker R. Experts say projected surgeon shortage a “looming crisis” for patient care. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1520–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(2):243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(3):172–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gruen RL, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D. The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(3):192–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92(4):389–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weber WP, Guller U, Jain NB, Pietrobon R, Oertli D. Impact of surgeon and hospital caseload on the likelihood of performing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a study based on 55, 949 patients. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):253–9. discussion 259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM, Wilson RG, Gunn A, Ratcliffe AA. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(7):880–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rogers Jr SO, Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244(6):1003–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McGrath DR, Leong DC, Gibberd R, Armstrong B, Spigelman AD. Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(10):901–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM, Fuchs CS, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(10):708–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Truong C, Wong JH, Lum SS, Morgan JW, Roy-Chowdhury S. The impact of hospital volume on the number of nodes retrieved and outcome in colorectal cancer. Am Surg. 2008;74(10):944–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW, et al. Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248(5):746–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bilimoria KY, Palis B, Stewart AK, et al. Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(2):154–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuhry E, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, et al. Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):687–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA, et al. Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):23–31. discussion 32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kennedy ED, Rothwell DM, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Increased experience and surgical technique lead to improved outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):958–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K. Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective. Surg Today. 2009;39(8):663–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Salz T, Sandler RS. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(11):1185–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Green P, et al. Does surgeon case volume influence nonfatal adverse outcomes after rectal cancer resection? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(3):1167–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harling H, Bulow S, Moller LN, Jorgensen T. Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994–99. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(1):90–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG. Does it ­matter where you are hospitalized for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide analysis of hospital volume. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(11):2789–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kaplan GG, McCarthy EP, Ayanian JZ, Korzenik J, Hodin R, Sands BE. Impact of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(3):680–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):404–11. discussion 411–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K. Impact of hospital case volume on the quality of laparoscopic colectomy in Japan. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(9):1619–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chowdhury M, Dagash H, Pierro A. a systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94:145–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bilimoria K, Phillips J, Rock C, Hayman A, Prystowsky J, Bentrem D. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1799–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Iversen L, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jorgensen P. Influence of caseload and surgical specialty on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2006;9:28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iversen L, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jorgensen P. Influence of caseload and surgical specialty on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2006;9:38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prystowsky J, Bordage G, Feinglass J. Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery. 2002;132:663–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walter LC, Davidowitz NP, Heineken PA, Covinsky KE. Pitfalls of converting practice guidelines into quality measures: lessons learned from a VA performance measure. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2466–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stahl TJ, Gregorcyk SG, Hyman NH, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the prevention of venous thrombosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(10):1477–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    National voluntary consensus standards for quality of cancer care: a consensus report. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2009.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL. Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(4):626–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McGory ML, Kao KK, Shekelle PG, et al. Developing quality indicators for elderly surgical patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):338–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pastor C, Artinyan A, Varma MG, Kim E, Gibbs L, Garcia-Aguilar J. An increase in compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project measures does not prevent surgical site infection in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Iezzoni LI, editor. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Koukouras D, Spiliotis J, Scopa CD, et al. Radical consequence in the sexuality of male patients operated for colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991;17(3):285–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, Fuchs KH, Thiede A. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg. 1998;85(12):1716–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(12):1617–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ko CY, Rusin LC, Schoetz Jr DJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: the association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery. J Surg Res. 2001;98(2):102–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Solomon MJ, Pager CK, Keshava A, et al. What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10):1351–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sokolovic E, Buchmann P, Schlomowitsch F, Szucs TD. Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(11):1663–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Efficace F, Bottomley A, Coens C, et al. Does a patient’s self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(1):42–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gall CA, Weller D, Esterman A, et al. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after treatment for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(6):801–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    da Silva GM, Hull T, Roberts PL, et al. The effect of colorectal surgery in female sexual function, body image, self-esteem and general health: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):266–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hann D, Denniston M, Baker F. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: further validation of the fatigue symptom inventory. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:847–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hann D, Jacobsen P, Azzarello L, et al. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the fatigue symptom inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:301–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tan G, Jensen M, Thornby J, Shanti B. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004;5(2):133–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tittle M, McMillan S, Hagan S. Validating the brief pain inventory for use with surgical patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30(2):325–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kopec J, Land S, Cecchini R, et al. Validation of a self-reported neurotoxicity scale in patients with operable colon cancer receiving oxaliplatin. J Support Oncol. 2006;4(8):1–8.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: self-­maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zebrack B, Yi J, Petersen L, Ganz P. The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psychooncology. 2008;17:891–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Crespi C, Ganz P, Petersen L, Castillo A, Caan B. Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(21):1530–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Scheier M, Carver C, Bridges M. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-master, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(6):1063–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ward W, Hahn E, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky D, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:181–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gandek B, Ware J, Aaronson N, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gandek B, Ware J. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):953–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item short-form health survey; construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston, MA: Health Assessment Lab; 1994.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sprangers M, te Velde A, Aaronson N. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of Life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(2):238–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C, et al. Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update on the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1564–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Fitch KB, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MS, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaro P, et al. The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica: Rand; 2000.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Park RE, et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA. 1987;258(18):2533–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hemingway H, Crook AM, Feder G, et al. Underuse of ­coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):645–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shekelle PG, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, Leape LL, Kamberg CJ, Park RE. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(26):1888–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine; 2009.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Congressional Budget Office. Research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments; 2007.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Patwardhan M, Samsa G, McCrory D, et al. Cancer care quality measures: diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 138. AHRQ Publication No. 06-E002. 2006.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Weinstein MC, Skinner JA. Comparative effectiveness and health care spending – implications for reform. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):460–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-­effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(45):1–141. iii–iv.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(2):CD003432.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, Gage H, Lovell DP, Rockall TA. Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(6):908–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93(7):800–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(4):344–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Formosa Chen
    • 1
  • Hiroko Kunitake
    • 2
  • Elise Lawson
    • 1
  • Joan Ryoo
    • 3
  • Clifford Y. Ko
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryRonald Regan UCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of General Internal Medicine/Health Services ResearchRonald Regan UCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryCenter for Surgical Outcomes and QualityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations