Advertisement

Robust Control of LTI Systems by Means of Structurally Constrained Controllers

  • Somayeh Sojoudi
  • Javad Lavaei
  • Amir G. Aghdam
Chapter

Abstract

Numerous real-world systems can be envisaged as interconnected systems consisting of a number of subsystems [1]. Every controller for such a system is often composed of a set of local controllers corresponding to the individual subsystems. In an unconstrained control structure, each local controller has access to the outputs of all the subsystems. This class of controllers is referred to as centralized. However, in many control applications, each local controller can only use the information of a subset of subsystems.

Keywords

IEEE Transaction Robust Control Algebraic Variety Robust Stabilizability Interconnected System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Decentralized control design for interconnected systems based on a centralized reference controller,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. G. Aghdam, E. J. Davison, and R. B. Arreola, “Structural modification of systems using discretization and generalized sampled-data hold functions,” Automatica, vol. 42 , no. 11, pp. 1935–1941, 2006.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. S. Smith and F. Y. Hadaegh, “Control topologies for deep space formation flying spacecraft,” in Proceedings of 2002 American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Optimal periodic feedback design for continuous-time LTI systems with constrained control structure,” International Journal of Control, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 220–230, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. J. Davison and T. N. Chang, “Decentralized stabilization and pole assignment for general proper systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 652–664, 1990.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. H. Wang and E. J. Davison, “On the stabilization of decentralized control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 1973.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Simultaneous LQ control of a set of LTI systems using constrained generalized sampled-data hold functions,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 274–280, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. D. ˇ Siljak and A. I. Zecevic, “Control of large-scale systems: Beyond decentralized feedback,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 29 , no.2, pp. 169–179, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. I. Zecevic and D. D. Šiljak, “A new approach to control design with overlapping information structure constraints,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 265–272, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. S. Stankovic, X. B. Chen and M. R. Matausek and D. D. Šiljak, “Stochastic inclusion principle applied to decentralized automatic generation control,” International Journal of Control, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 276–288, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Elimination of fixed modes by means of high-performance constrained periodic control,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Gong and M. Aldeen, “Stabilization of decentralized control systems,” Journal of Mathematical Systems, Estimation, and Control, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1997.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a LTI stabilizing decentralized overlapping controller,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. T. Lin, “Structural controllability,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 1974.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Mayeda, “On structural controllability theorem,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 795–798, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Hosoe and K. Matsumoto, “On the irreducibility condition in the structural controllability theorem,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 963–966, 1979.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. J. Reinschke, F. Svaricek and H. D. Wend, “On strong structural controllability of linear systems,” in Proceedings of 31st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Yamada and D. Luenberger, “Generic controllability theorems for descriptor systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 144–152, 1985.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. E. Sezer and D. D. Šiljak, “Structurally fixed modes,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. A. Ossman, “Indirect adaptive control for interconnected systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 908–911, 1989.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. T. Gavel and D. D. Šiljak, “Decentralized adaptive control: structural conditions for stability,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 413–426, 1989.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Ioannou and J. Sun, Robust adaptive control, Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. C.L.F Oliveira and P. L.D. Peres, “LMI conditions for robust stability analysis based on polynomially parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2006.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “A necessary and sufficient condition for robust stability of LTI discrete-time systems using sum-of-squares matrix polynomials,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O. Bachelier, J. Bernussou, M. C. de Oliveira and J. C. Geromel, “Parameter dependant Lyapunov control design: numerical evaluation,” in Proceedings of 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Henrion, M. Sebek and V. Kucera, “Positive polynomials and robust stabilization with fixed-order controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1178–1186, 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Ghulchak, “Robust stabilizability and low-order controllers: duality principle in case studies,” in Proceedings of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Bahamas, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Nikodem and A. W. Olbrot, “Robust stabilizability with phase perturbations,” in Proceedings of 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1995.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    K. Benjelloun, E. K. Boukas and P. Shi, “Robust stabilizability of uncertain linear systems with Markovian jumping parameters,” in Proceedings of 1997 American Control Conference, pp. 866–867, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1997.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. Wei and R. K. Yedavalli, “Robust stabilizability for linear systems with both parameter variation and unstructured uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 149–156, Feb. 1989.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Kwakernaak, “A condition for robust stabilizability,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, Jul. 1982.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. Harris, Algebraic geometry: a first course (graduate texts in mathematics), Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somayeh Sojoudi
    • 1
  • Javad Lavaei
    • 1
  • Amir G. Aghdam
    • 2
  1. 1.Control & Dynamical Systems Dept.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Dept. Electrical & Computer EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontreal QuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations