Advertisement

Elimination of Decentralized Fixed Modes via Optimal Information Exchange

  • Somayeh Sojoudi
  • Javad Lavaei
  • Amir G. Aghdam
Chapter

Abstract

Numerous real-world systems can be modeled as the interconnected systems consisting of a number of subsystems. The control of an interconnected system is often carried out by means of a set of local controllers, corresponding to the interacting subsystems [1, 2]. It is sometimes assumed that the local controllers can fully communicate with each other in order to elevate their effectiveness over the entire system cooperatively. However, this design technique is often problematic as the required data transmission between two particular local controllers (or equivalently, two subsystems) can be unjustifiably expensive or occasionally infeasible. Consequently, it is normally desired that the local controllers either exchange partial information or act independently of each other. The latter case, where the overall controller consists of a set of isolated local controllers, is referred to as decentralized control in the literature [3, 4, 5]. The control structure in a decentralized control system is, in fact, block-diagonal. It is to be noted that the decentralized control theory has found applications in large space structures, power systems, communication networks, etc. [6, 7, 8, 9]. A wide variety of properties of the decentralized control systems are extensively studied in the literature and different design techniques are proposed [10, 11, 12, 13].

Keywords

Bipartite Graph Interconnected System Local Controller Maximal Graph Large Space Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Lavaei, A. Momeni and A. G. Aghdam, “High-performance decentralized control for formation flying with leader-follower structure,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Decentralized control design for interconnected systems based on a centralized reference controller,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. B. Ozguler, “Global stabilization via local stabilizing actions,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 530–533, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. J. Davison and T. N. Chang, “Decentralized stabilization and pole assignment for general proper systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 652–664, 1990.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. D. Šiljak, Decentralized control of complex systems, Cambridge: Academic Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Li and Y. Wang, “Nonlinear robust decentralized control of multimachine power systems,” in Proc. 7th International Power Engineering Conference, pp. 1–6, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. E. Khatir and E. J. Davison, “Decentralized control of a large platoon of vehicles operating on a plane with steering dynamics,” in Proc. 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, pp. 2159–2165, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Fay and I. Fischer, “Decentralized control strategies for transportation systems,” International Conference on Control and Automation, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 898–903, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. A. Movsichoff, C. M. Lagoa, and H. Che, “Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 293–303, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Elimination of fixed modes by means of high-performance constrained periodic control,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Simultaneous LQ control of a set of LTI systems using constrained generalized sampled-data hold functions,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 274–280, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Duan, J. Z. Wang, and L. Huang, “Special decentralized control problems and effectiveness of parameter-dependent Lyapunov function method,” in Proc. 2005 American Control Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1697–1702, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Optimal periodic feedback design for continuous-time LTI systems with constrained control structure,” International Journal of Control, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 220–230, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. H. Wang and E. J. Davison, “On the stabilization of decentralized control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 1973.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. D. O. Anderson and D. J. Clements, “Algebraic characterizations of fixed modes in decentralized systems,” Automatica, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 703–712, 1981.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. D. O. Anderson, “Transfer function matrix description of decentralized fixed modes,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1176–1182, 1982.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. J. Davison and S. H. Wang, “A characterization of decentralized fixed modes in terms of transmission zeros,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 81–82, 1985.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “Characterization of decentralized and quotient fixed modes via graph theory,” in Proceedings of 2007 American Control Conference, New York, NY, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. Armentano and M. Singh, “A procedure to eliminate decentralized fixed modes with reduced information exchange,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 258–260, 1982.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Unyelioglu and E. Sezer, “Optimum feedback patterns in multivariable control systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 791–808, 1989.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. E. Sezer and D. D. Šiljak, “Structurally fixed modes,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Belmehdi and D. Boukhetala, “Method to eliminate structurally fixed modes in decentralized control systems,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 33, no. 15, pp. 1249–1256, 2002.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a LTI stabilizing decentralized overlapping controller,” in Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Lavaei and A. G. Aghdam, “On structurally constrained control design with a prespecified form,” in Proceedings of 2007 American Control Conference, New York, NY, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. D. Šiljak and A. I. Zecevic, “Control of large-scale systems: Beyond decentralized feedback,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 29, no.2, pp. 169–179, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Ikeda, D. D. Šiljak and D. E. White, “Decentralized control with overlapping information sets,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 279–310, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somayeh Sojoudi
    • 1
  • Javad Lavaei
    • 1
  • Amir G. Aghdam
    • 2
  1. 1.Control & Dynamical Systems Dept.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Dept. Electrical & Computer EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontreal QuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations