Advertisement

Wavelets pp 189-203 | Cite as

Designing Your Own Wavelet

  • Robert X. Gao
  • Ruqiang Yan
Chapter

Abstract

To achieve effective signal signature extraction, Chap. 10 introduced several quantitative measures for selecting appropriate base wavelets from a pool of available wavelet families, such as Daubechies, Myer, and Morlet wavelets. This chapter introduces a complimentary technique focusing on wavelet customization. The goal is to design a wavelet that is specifically adapted to the signal of interest. Because such a customized wavelet would have a higher degree of matching with the signal than other wavelets, the effectiveness of signature extraction will improve.

Keywords

Impulse Response Wavelet Coefficient Scaling Function Base Wavelet Filter Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aldroubi A, Unser M (1993) Families of multiresolution and wavelet spaces with optimal properties. Numer Funct Anal Optim 14:417–446MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burrus CS, Gopinath R, Guo H (1998) Introduction to wavelets and wavelet transforms: a primer. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapa JO, Rao RM (2000) Algorithm for designing wavelets to match a specified signal. IEEE Trans Signal Process 48(12):3395–3406MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen A, Daubechies I, Feauveau JC (1992) Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math 45:485–560MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cui CK, Montefusco L, Puccio L (1994) Wavelet: theory, algorithms, and applications. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Daubechies I (1988) Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math 41:909–996MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Pennsylvania, PAMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gopinath RA, Odegard JE, Burrus CS (1994) Optimal wavelet representation of signals and wavelet sampling theorem. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Analog Digital Signal Process 41:262–277MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guido RC, Slaets JFW, Koberle R, Almeida LOB, Pereira JC (2006) A new technique to construct a wavelet transform matching a specified signal with applications to digital, real time, spike, and overlap pattern recognition. Digit Signal Process 16:22–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta A, Joshi SD, Prasad S (2005a) A new approach for estimation of statistically matched wavelet. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53(5):1778–1793MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta A, Joshi SD, Prasad S (2005b) A new method of estimating wavelet with desired features from a given signal. Signal Processing 85:147–161MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris T (1991) Rolling bearing analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Inman D (1996) Engineering vibration. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser G (1994) A Friendly Guide to Wavelets. Birkhauser, Boston, MAMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lou X, Loparo KA (2004) Bearing fault diagnosis based on wavelet transform and fuzzy inference. Mech Syst Signal Process 18:1077–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu WS, Antoniou A (2001) Design of signal-adapted biorthogonal filter banks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theory Appl 48:90–102.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lutes L, Sarkani S (1997) Stochastic analysis of structural and mechanical vibrations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, Boston, MAMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Misiti M, Misiti Y, Oppenheim G, Poggi J (1997) Wavelet toolbox for use with Matlab. The Math Works, Inc., Natick, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Shark L, Yu C (2003) Design of optimal shift-invariant orthonormal wavelet filter banks via genetic algorithm. Signal Processing 83:2579–2591MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shark L, Yu C (2006) Design of matched wavelets based on generalized Mexican-hat function. Signal Processing 86:1451–1469MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tewfik AH, Sinha D, Jorgensen P (1992) On the optimal choice of a wavelet for signal representation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38:747–765MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yan R, Gao R, Wang C (2009) Experimental evaluation of a unified time-scale-frequency technique for bearing defect feature extraction. ASME J Vib Acoust 131:041012-1-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young R (1993) Wavelet theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang S, Mathew J, Ma L, Sun Y (2005) Best basis-based intelligent machine fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 19:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.School of Instrument Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina, People’s Republic

Personalised recommendations