Advertisement

Epilogue: Toward a New Legal Form for Civic Engagement

  • Masayuki Deguchi
Chapter
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)

Linguapolitical Research

Some time ago, I was invited to attend a research meeting at Harvard University by the anthropologist Professor Theodore C. Bestor. He published “Neighborhood Tokyo” (1989) under the name of Miyamoto-cho, in which he described community organization in a neighborhood in Tokyo. The terminology such as “civil society organizations,” had not been popular among researchers. His outstanding anthropological research of civil society in Japan is not usually considered as civil society research. Looking back, studies into Japan by US-origin anthropologists have a long and brilliant history, and in this line of tradition Bestor particularly studied Japan’s civil society organizations in a new context. One of the first examples is “Suye mura: A Japanese Village” (Embree 1939), a classic in Japanese community studies. Bestor did not veil an anthropologists’ pride while building on the long tradition of anthropological observers of Japan’s civil society. Frank Schwartz...

Keywords

Civil Society Civic Engagement Civil Society Organization Civil Code Dominant Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amemiya, T. & T. Hotta (Ed.) (1998). NPO ho konmentaaru (NPO Law Comment). Gyosei.Google Scholar
  2. Bestor, T.C. (1989). Neighborhood Tokyo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cabinet Office (2007). Heisei 19 Nendo Shimin Katsudo Tyosa Hokokusyo (2007 Report on Survey for Civic Activities). http://www.npo-homepage.go.jp/data/report23.html
  4. Deguchi, M. (2001). The distortion between institutionalized and noninstitutionalized NPO: New Policy Initiative and the Nonprofit Organizations in Japan. In H.K. Anheier & J. Kendall (Ed.), Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads: An international nonprofit analysis (Pp. 277-301). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Deguchi, M. (2005). Why can international NGOs be “global”? A new approach named “Linguapolitics” Proceedings ISTR Asia Pacific Regional Conference 2005 (Pp. 1-21). Bangalore, India. November 16-18, 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Deguchi, M., G.P. Dhakal, & T.N. Dhakal (Ed.) (2008). Conflicts vs. Social Harmony. Does Non-Profit Sector Matter? Tokyo: Aggreplanning.Google Scholar
  7. Embree, J.F. (1939) Suye Mura: A Japanese Village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ishizuka, H. (2002). The Social Economy Sector in Japan. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73, 2: 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kada, Y. (2006). Three Paradigms behind River Governance in Japan: Modern Technicism, Nature Conservationism and Life Environmentalism. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 15, 1: 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ministry of Home Office & Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) (2005). Koeki Hojin Hakusho (White paper on Koeki Hojins). Tokyo: MHO, MIC.Google Scholar
  11. Pekkanen, R. (2000). Japan’s new politics: The case of the NPO Law. Journal of Japanese Studies, 26, 1: 111–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pekkanen, R (2006) Japan’s dual civil society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schwartz, F.J. & Pharr, S.J. (Ed.) (2003) The state of civil society in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Yushikisya kaigi (2004) Report by Expert Meeting of the Public interest Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minpaku National Museum of Ethnology and Graduate University for Advanced StudiesOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations