Infertility Status and Infertility Treatment: Racial and Ethnic Disparities

  • Sylvia Guendelman
  • Laura Stachel


Difficulties in conceiving or carrying a child to term affect 12% of the 62 million American women between ages 15–44 (Chandra, Martinez, Mosher, Abma, & Jones, 2005). Involuntary childlessness often leads to disappointment and despair, contributing to depression, marital strife and social stigma. Although infertility status, access to infertility care, and response to medical treatment are not ­distributed uniformly among women of reproductive age, few studies have examined the experiences of women of color. Evidence suggests important racial/ethnic disparities in the diagnosis and ­prevalence of infertility. Furthermore, the privatization of infertility clinical services and the high costs of these services have contributed to wide racial and socioeconomic inequalities in utilization of treatment.


Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rate Clinical Pregnancy Rate Tubal Factor Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allen, V. M., & Wilson, R. D., et al. (2006). Joint Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Guideline: Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 173, 220–233.Google Scholar
  2. Bendikson, K., Cramer, D. W., Vitonis, A., & Hornstein, M. D. (2005). Ethnic background and in vitro fertilization outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 88(3), 342–3466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitler, M., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 858–865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (1999). Preterm singleton births – United States, 1989–1996. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report, 48, 185–189.Google Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2004). STD Surveillance 2004. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from
  6. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). (2007). 2005 assisted reproductive technology success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.Google Scholar
  7. Chandra, A. (2005). The National Survey of Family Growth as an extension of the Vital Statistics System. National Center for Health Statistics, Powerpoint presented at NAPHSIS. Cincinnati, Ohio, June 8, 2005. Available at .
  8. Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Statistics, 23(25), 1–160.Google Scholar
  9. Chandra, A., & Stephen, E. (1998). Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982–1995. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, O. K. (2004). Elective single-embryo transfer – has its time arrived? New England Journal of Medicine, 351(23), 2440–2442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. (2000). Multiple gestation pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 15(7), 1856–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feinberg, E. C., Larsen, F. W., Catherino, W. H., Zhang, J., & Armstrong, A. Y. (2006). Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 888–894.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Feinberg, E. C., Larsen, F. W., Wah, R. M., Alvero, R. J., & Armstrong, A. Y. (2007). Economics may not explain Hispanic underutilization of assisted reproductive technology services. Fertility and Sterility, 88(5), 1439–1441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambone, J. C. (2006). Are adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes more common with assisted reproductive technologies? What should patients be told? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 49(1), 123–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gold, R. B., Richards, C. L., Ranji, U., & Salganicoff, A. (2007). Medicaid’s role in family planning. Kaiser Family Foundation, Issue Brief. (Report #7064–03.)Google Scholar
  16. Grainger, D. A., Seifer, D. B., Frazier, L. M., Rall, M. J., Tjaden, B. L., & Merrill, J. C. (2004). Racial disparity in clinical outcomes from women using advanced reproductive technologies (ART): Analysis of 80,196 ART cycles from the SART database 1999 and 2000. Fertility and Sterility, 82, s37–s38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grayson, C. (2003). In vitro fertilization. Retrieved July 1, 2006 from
  18. Green, J. A., Robins, J. C., Scheiber, M., Awadally, S., & Thomas, M. A. (2001). Racial and economic demographics of couples seeking infertility treatment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184, 1080–1082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. H.R. 2892. (2007). The Family Building Act of 2007. Library of Congress THOMAS. Retrieved March 31, 2008 from
  20. Heitman, E. (1995). Infertility as a public health problem: why assisted reproductive technologies are not the answer. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 6(2), 89–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Inhorn, M. C., & Fakih, M. H. (2006). Arab Americans, African Americans, and infertility: Barriers to reproduction and medical care. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 844–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jain, T. (2005). Disparities in access to infertility in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertility and Sterility, 85(1), 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain, T. (2006). Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 876–881.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. James, C. E., Hammond, K. R., & Steinkampf, M. P. (2002). Race and assisted reproduction: A case-controlled study of outcomes in African-American and Caucasian women [abstract]. Fertility and Sterility, 78(suppl 1), S123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins, R. L. (2005). Ensuring access to education and services on infertility for the underserved. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 34, 101–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured and the Women’s Health Policy Program. (2001). Medicaid coverage of family planning services: Results of a national survey. [Electronic version]. Publication No. 2216. Retrieved March 3, 2008 from
  27. Kalmuss, D. S. (1987). The use of infertility services among fertility-impaired couples. Demography, 24(4), 575–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. King, R. B., & Davis, J. (2006). Introduction: health disparities in infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 842–843.Google Scholar
  29. King, L., & Harrington-Meyer, M. (1997). The politics of reproductive benefits. Gender and Society, 11(1), 8–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lashen, H., Afnan, M., & Sharif, K. (1999). A controlled comparison of ovarian response to controlled stimulation in first generation Asian women compared with white Caucasians undergoing in vitro fertilization. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106(5), 407–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahmud, G., Lopez Bernal, A., Yudkin, P., Ledger, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1995). A controlled assessment of the in vitro fertilization performance of British women of Indian origin compared with white women. Fertility and Sterility, 64(1), 103–106, 199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosher, W. D., & Bachrach, C. A. (1996). Understanding U.S. fertility: Continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988–1995. Family Planning Perspectives, 28(1), 4–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nichols, J. E. Jr., Higdon, H. L. 3rd, Crane, M. M. 4th, & Boone, W. R. (2001). Comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates in African American and white women in an assisted reproductive technology practice. Fertility and Sterility, 76(1), 80–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nygren, K. G. (2007). Single embryo transfer: The role of natural cycle/minimal stimulation IVF in the future. Reproductive Biomedical Online, 14(5), 626–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Infertility: Medical and social choices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  36. Pandian, Z., Templeton, A., Serour, G., & Bhattacharya, S. (2005). Number of embryos for Transfer after IVF and ICSI: A Cochrane review. Human Reproduction, 20(10), 2681–2687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Parham, G. P., & Hicks, M. L. (2005). Racial disparities affecting the reproductive health of African-American women. The Medical Clinics of North America, 89(5), 935–943.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Purcell, K. J., Schembri, M., Frazier, L. M., Rall, M. J., Shen, S., Croughan, M., et al. (2007). Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 87(2), 297–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Reddy, U. M., Wapner, R. J., Rebar, R. W., & Tasca, R. J. (2007). Infertility, assisted reproductive technology and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(4), 967–977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reynolds, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Jeng, G., & Peterson, H. B. (2003). Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology? Fertility and Sterility, 80(1), 16–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Russell, R. B., Petrini, J. R., Damus, K., Mattison, D. R., & Schwarz, H. (2003). The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101(1), 129–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schieve, L. A., Ferre, C., Peterson, H. B., Macaluso, M., Reynolds, M. A., & Wright, V. C. (2004). Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(6), 1144–1153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schieve, L. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Buck, G. M., Schendel, D. E., Reynolds, M. A., & Wright, V. C. (2004). Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(6), 1154–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulman, J. D. (2007). “What’s your success rate?”: Understanding IVF pregnancy statistics: Part I. Retrieved July 7, 2007 from
  45. Seifer, D. B., Frazier, L. M., & Grainger, D. C. (2008). Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared to white women. Fertility and Sterility, 90(5), 1701–1710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharara, F., & McClamrock, H. (2000). Differences in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome between white and black women in an inner-city, university based IVF program. Fertility and Sterility, 73(6), 1170–1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinberg, E. P., Holtz, P. M., Sullivan, E. M., & Villar, C. P. (1998). Profiling assisted reproductive technology: outcomes and quality of infertility management. Fertility and Sterility, 69(4), 617–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephen, E. H., & Chandra, A. Infertility service utilization among women aged 15–44 in the United States, 2002. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, March 30–April 11, Los Angeles, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
  49. Stephen, E. H., & Chandra, A. (2006). Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995. Family Planning Perspectives, 32(3), 132–137.Google Scholar
  50. Wang, J. X., Norman, R. J., & Kristiansson, P. (2002). The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Human Reproduction, 17(4), 945–949.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. White, L., McQuillan, J., & Greil, A. L. (2006). Explaining disparities in treatment seeking: the case of infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 853–857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, V. C., Chang, J., Jeng, G., & Macaluso, M. (2006). Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 55(SS04), 1–22.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, V. C., Schieve, L. A., Reynolds, M. A., & Jeng, G. (2005). Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 352(SS02), 1–24.Google Scholar
  54. Zhang, J., Meikle, S., Grainger, D. A., & Trumble, A. (2002). Multifetal pregnancy in older women and perinatal outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 78(3), 562–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations