Advertisement

Gender and Personality

  • Jayne E. Stake
  • Heather Eisele
Chapter

Abstract

Personality is the study of individual differences and thus holds promise for a better understanding of how our gendered society shapes and reinforces differences in women’s and men’s attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. Two strengths of present-day personality research are particularly relevant for the study of gender. First, personality researchers gather data from large samples of normally functioning individuals and emphasize the importance of accurate generalizations of their findings to other normal samples. This methodology allows for the veridical assessment of similarity and difference trends in women’s and men’s personality characteristics. Second, is the attention personality researchers typically give to the careful measurement of constructs through adequate sampling of concept domains, empirical validation, and reliability checks.

Keywords

Gender Difference Personality Research Feminine Trait Social Role Theory Mental Health Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allgood-Merton, B., & Stockard, J. (1991). Sex role identity and self-esteem: A comparison of children and adolescents. Sex Roles, 25, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the five factor model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. (2006). NEO-FFI scores in college men and women: A view from McDonald’s unified treatment of test theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 911–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bouchard, T. J. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bozionelos, N., & Bozionelos, G. (2003). Instrumental and expressive traits: Their relationship and their association with biological sex. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruch, M. A. (2002). The relevance of mitigated and unmitigated agency and communion for depression vulnerabilities and dysphoria. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brummett, B. H., Babyak, M. A., Williams, R. B., Barefoot, J. C., Costa, P. T., & Siegler, I. C. (2006). NEO personality domains and gender predict levels and trends in body mass index over 14 years during midlife. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burleson, B. R., & Gilstrap, C. M. (2002). Explaining sex differences in interaction goals in support situations: Some mediating effects of expressivity and instrumentality. Communication Reports, 15, 43–55.Google Scholar
  13. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity–femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  15. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawford, M., & Unger, R. (2004). Women and gender: A feminist psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Dinda, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Feingold, J. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldt, T., Metsapelto, R., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2007). Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality: Conceptual relationships. European Psychologist, 12, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fertman, C. I., & Chubb, N. H. (1992). The effects of a psychoeducational program on adolescents’ activity involvement, self-esteem, and locus of control. Adolescence, 27, 517–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gabbard, G. O. (2005). Mind, brain, and personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 648–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1086–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilbert, P. (2005). Compassion and cruelty: A biopsychosocial approach. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), Compassion: Conceptualisations, research, and use in psychotherapy (pp. 9–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Harter, S. (1993). Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 87–116). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  27. Haslam, N. (1997). Evidence that male sexual orientation is a matter of degree. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 862–870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heller, D., Watson, D., Komar, J., Min, J., & Perunovic, W. Q. E. (2007). Contextualized personality: Traditional and new assessment procedures. Journal of Personality, 75, 1229–1253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Helwig-Larson, M., Cunningham, S. J., Carrico, A., & Pergram, A. M. (2004). To nod or not to nod: An observational study of nonverbal communication and status in female and male college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 358–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hermann, K. S., & Betz, N. E. (2006). Path models of the relationship of instrumentality and expressiveness, social self-efficacy, and self-esteem to depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1086–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoffman, M. L., Powlishta, K. K., & White, K. J. (2004). An examination of gender differences in adolescent adjustment: The effect of competence on gender role differences in symptoms of psychopathology. Sex Roles, 50, 795–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt, M. G. (1993). Expressiveness does predict well-being. Sex Roles, 29, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huselid, R. F., & Cooper, M. L. (1994). Gender roles as mediators of sex differences in expression of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 595–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, W. H., Chernovetz, M. E., & Hansson, R. O. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaminski, P. L., Shafer, M. E., Neumann, C. S., & Ramos, V. (2005). Self-concept in Mexican American girls and boys: Validating the Self-Description Questionnaire I. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11, 321–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Klein, K. J., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. LaFrance, M., Hecht, M., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). Contingent smile: Meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lengua, L. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2000). Gender, gender roles, and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles, 43, 787–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lippa, R. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity–femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 119–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S., & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The five-factor model of personality: Measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae, & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 227–248). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  46. Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Major, B., Barr, L., Zubek, J., & Babey, S. H. (1999). Gender and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. In W. B. Swann, J. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 223–253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  48. Manstead, A. (1992). Gender differences in emotion. In A. Gale, & M. W. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences: Biological perspectives (pp. 355–387). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-Description Questionnaire II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  51. Marsh, H. W. (1992a). Self-Description Questionnaire II: Manual. Macarthur, Australia: Publication Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  52. Marsh, H. W. (1992b). Self-Description Questionnaire III: Manual. Macarthur, Australia: Publication Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  53. Marsh, H. W. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., & Ayotte, V. (2004). A multidimensional perspective of relations between self-concept (Self-Description Questionnaire II) and adolescent mental health (Youth Self-Report). Psychological Assessment, 16, 27–41.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Senin, I. G. (2000, July). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  56. McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819–846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Yik, M. S. M. (1996). Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure. In M. H. Bond (Ed.)? The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 189–207). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Miller, R. J. (2001). Gender differences in illusion response: The influence of spatial strategy and sex ratio. Sex Roles, 44, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moskowitz, D. S, Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 233–250.Google Scholar
  61. Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Pillard, R. C. (1991). Masculinity and femininity in homosexuality: “Inversion” revisited. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 32–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
  66. Roberts, B. W. (2007). Contextualizing personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 75, 1071–1082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rubinstein, G., & Strul, S. (2006). The five factor model (FFM) among four groups of male and female professionals. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 931–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Di Dio, L., & Aube, J. (1997). Agency, communion, and well-being: Extending Helgeson’s (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the big five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Sellers, J. G., Mehl, M. R., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Hormones and personality: Testosterone as a marker of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2005). Structure and change in self-concept during adolescence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 83–96.Google Scholar
  74. Sharpe, M. J., Heppner, P. P., & Dixon, W. A. (1995). Gender role conflict, instrumentality, expressiveness, and well-being in adult men. Sex Roles, 33, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.Google Scholar
  76. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers in sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Stake, J. E. (1992). Gender differences and similarities in self-concept within everyday life contexts. Psychological of Women Quarterly, 16, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stake, J. E. (1994). Development and validation of the Six-Factor Self-Concept Scale for Adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stake, J. E. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and instrumentality in real-life settings: A new perspective on the benefits of androgyny. Sex Roles, 37, 541–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stake, J. E. (2000). When situations call for instrumentality and expressiveness: Resource appraisal, coping strategy choice, and adjustment. Sex Roles, 42, 865–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stake, J. E., Zand, D., & Smalley, R. (1996). The relation of instrumentality and expressiveness to self-concept and adjustment: A social context perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 167–190.Google Scholar
  85. Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1992). The effect of agency and communality on self-esteem: Gender differences in longitudinal data. Sex Roles, 26, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stryker, S. (2007). Identity theory and personality theory: Mutual relevance. Journal of Personality, 75, 1083–1102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Swann, W. B., Chang-Schneider, C., & McClarty, K. L. (2007). Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 84–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O., (2003). Mind reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1079–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrell, K. W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74, 779–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48, 555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept (Vol. 1). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  97. Yang, Y., Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yanico, B. J., & Lu, T. G. C. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the Six-Factor Self-Concept Scale in a sample of racial/ethnic minority women. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yoder, J. D. (2003). Women and gender: Transforming psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayne E. Stake
    • 1
  • Heather Eisele
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations