Skip to main content

Gender and the Division of Labor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the division of labor between women and men and the distinction commonly drawn between domestic work and paid work. Work performed directly in the service of families – including housework and childcare – is often unacknowledged because of cultural assumptions that a wife or mother should do it in the privacy of the home. Paid work, on the other hand, is much more public and historically associated with men. Holding a job and earning a salary has been considered to be a husband’s traditional family obligation, whereas tending to home and children traditionally has been considered a wife’s primary obligation (even if she also works outside the home).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The MTUS is available from the Centre for Time Use Research, University of Oxford. For more information access http://www.timeuse.org/.

  2. 2.

    More information on HETUS is available at https://http://www.testh2.scb.se/tus/tus/.

  3. 3.

    The AHTUS is available from the Centre for Time Use Research, University of Oxford. For more information access http://www.timeuse.org/.

References

  • Adams, M., Coltrane, S., & Parke, R. D. (2007). Cross-ethnic applicability of the gender-based attitudes toward marriage and child rearing scales. Sex Roles, 56, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, D., Maggs, J., & Galambos, N. (1993). Wives’ employment hours and spousal participation in family work. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altschuler, J. (2004). Meaning of housework and other unpaid responsibilities among older women. Journal of Women & Aging, 16, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, B., & Maume, D. (2000). Workplace subordination and men’s avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 464–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artis, J. E., & Pavalko, E. K. (2003). Explaining the decline in women’s household labor: Individual change and cohort differences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 746–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Shen, Y.-C. (1997). Gender, high- and low-schedule-control housework tasks, and psychological distress: A study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, S., Blanton, P., & Gillard, J. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalova, J., & Cohen, P. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, E. (1991). The economic context of labor allocation: Implications for gender stratification. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 140–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L. (1993). Employment, family, and perceptions of marital quality among husbands and wives. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 178–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisure, K., & Allen, K. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R., & Coleman, M. (1989). A theoretical look at the balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 225–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield, A. (1992). Employment resources and housework in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5, 302–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broman, C. (1988). Household work and family life satisfaction of Blacks. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 743–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broman, C. (1993). Race differences in marital well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 724–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. W., Brooks, R. C., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C. J. (1998). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parents: Associations with children’s adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 402–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. S. (1992). Chinatown no more: Taiwan immigrants in contemporary New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (1998). Replacing housework in the service economy: Gender, class, and race-ethnicity in service spending. Gender & Society, 12, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2008). Gender and families. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Men’s housework: A life-course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., & Valdez, E. (1993). Reluctant compliance: Work/family role allocation in dual-earner Chicano families. In J. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 151–175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R., & Harris, F. (1999). Attitudes, women’s employment and the changing domestic division of labour. In R. Crompton (Ed.), Restructuring gender relations and employment (pp. 279–315). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2007). Influences of women’s employment on the gendered division of household labor over the life course: Evidence from a 31-year panel study. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 422–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dance, L., & Gilbert, L. (1993). Spouses’ family work participation and its relation to wives’ occupational level. Sex Roles, 28, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., & Marks, J. P. G. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A., & Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Social Forces, 74, 1043–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMeis, D., & Perkins, H. (1996). “Supermoms” of the nineties: Homemaker and employed mothers’ performance and perceptions of the motherhood role. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 776–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demo, D., & Acock, A. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed? Family Relations, 42, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaway, H., & Broman, C. (2001). Race, class, and gender differences in marital satisfaction and divisions of household labor among dual-earner couples: A case for intersectional analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, J. E. (2004). Predictors of negative spillover from family to work. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, B., Miles, E., & Icenogle, M. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeability of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (1999). Gender and labor in Asian immigrant families. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 628–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K., Egerton, M., Gershuny, J. I., & Robinson, J. P. (2006). Gender convergence in the American Heritage Time Use Study (AHTUS). Social Indicators Research. DOI 10.1007/s11205-006-9017-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gager, C. T., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2006). Distributive justice in the household: A comparison of alternative theoretical models. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 25, 537–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitment to family and work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdingen, D. K., & Center, B. A. (2005). First-time parents’ postpartum changes in employment, childcare, and housework responsibilities. Social Science Research, 34, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1994). Housework, paid work, and depression among husbands and wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 179–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N., Chang, G., & Forcey, L. R. (Eds.). (1994). Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2007). The division of labor and perceptions of parental roles: Lesbian couples across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. (1990). Division of household labor, strain, and depressive symptoms among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, N. K., Clark, M. S., & Moore, A. (2004). Perceptions of injustice in family work: The role of psychological distress. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 480–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, N. K., Naylor, K. E., & Clark, M. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be fair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 510–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Family-work, work-family spillover, and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of marital status transitions on men’s housework performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35, 975–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependency, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, R., & del Campo, R. (1995). Beyond the superwoman syndrome: Work satisfaction and family functioning among working-class, Mexican American women. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. A., & Duxbury, L. E. (1992). Work-family conflict: A comparison of dual-career and traditional-career men. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, D. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10, 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himsel, A. J., & Goldberg, W. A. (2003). Social comparisons and satisfaction with the division of housework: Implications for men’s and women’s role strain. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 843–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. [with Machung, A.]. (2003). The second shift (2nd ed.). New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann-Marriott, B. E. (2006). Shared beliefs and union stability of married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1015–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z., & Roopnarine, J. (1993). Division of household labor and child care in dual-earner African-American families with infants. Sex Roles, 29, 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, D., & Shelton, B. (1997). The production of gender among Black and White women and men. Sex Roles, 36, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & O’Connor, E. (2002). The gay baby boom: The psychology of gay parenthood. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamo, Y., & Cohen, E. L. (1998). Division of household work between partners: A comparison of Black and White couples. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, J. R., & Reynolds, J. R. (2005). The job costs of family demands: Gender differences in negative family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluwer, E., Heesink, J., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. (1993). The allocation of household labor in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married couples. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M., & Rosenfeld, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lye, D., & Biblarz, T. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 157–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid, S., Huston, T., & McHale, S. (1990). Changes in marriage associated with the transition to parenthood: Individual differences as a function of sex-role attitudes and changes in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S., & Crouter, A. (1992). You can’t always get what you want – incongruence between sex-role attitudes and family work roles and its implications for marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, D. (1994). Gay parenting couples: Parenting arrangements, arrangement satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pacific University Graduate School of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, J., McNaughton-Cassill, M., & Lynch, M. (2006). The management of household and childcare tasks and relationship satisfaction in dual-earner families. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirande, A. (1997). Hombres et machos: Masculinity and Latino culture. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. (1985). Continuities and discontinuities in women’s labor force activity. In J. G. H. Elder (Ed.), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 113–155). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Coltrane, S. (2004). Families, theories, and social policy. In V. Bengtson, D. Klein, A. Acock, K. Allen, & P. Dilworth-Anderson (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 534–556). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T., & Custer, L. (1995). The social context of married women’s work and its impact on Black husbands and White husbands. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T., & Eyster, S. (1997). Division of household labor among Black couples and White couples. Social Forces, 76, 301–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (1955). Family: Socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (2000). Family relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1052–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C., Sutfin, E., & Fulcher, M. (2004). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parenting couples: Correlates of specialized versus shared patterns. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L., & Spalding, L. (2000). The close relationship of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In C. Hendrick & S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 111–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, H., & DeMeis, D. (1996). Gender and family effects on the second-shift domestic activity of college-educated young adult. Gender & Society, 10, 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., & Crouter, A. (1990). Men’s provider-role attitudes: Implications for household work and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestello, F., & Voydanoff, P. (1991). In search of mesostructure in the family: An interactionist approach to division of labor. Symbolic Interaction, 14, 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina, D., & Bengtson, V. (1993). The division of household labor and wives’ happiness – Ideology, employment, and perceptions of support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 901–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, K., & Coltrane, S. (2009). Divisions of labor in Mexican origin and Anglo families: Structure and culture. Sex Roles, 60, 482–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24, 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potuchek, J. (1992). Employed wives’ orientations to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 548–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1989). Can we make time for children? Demography, 26, 523–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, K. (1994). Women’s employment as a gift or burden? Marital power across marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Gender & Society, 8, 73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, K. (2004). Immigrant families in the U.S. In J. L. Scott, J. Treas, & M. P. Richards (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of the family (pp. 253–269). New York: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (1998). Back to the basics: Trends in and role determinants of women’s attitudes toward housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle while you work? The effect of household task performance on women’s and men’s well-being. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 844–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L. (1993). Women’s power and the gendered division of domestic labor in the third world. Gender & Society, 7, 434–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. (1990). The distribution of household tasks: Does wife’s employment status make a difference? Journal of Family Issues, 11, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. (1992). Women, men, and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B., & John, D. (1993a). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B., & John, D. (1993b). Ethnicity, race, and difference: A comparison of White, Black, and Hispanic men’s household labor time. In J. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 131–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, C. R., Acock, A. C., & Walker, A. J. (2004). Gender ideology and investment in housework: Postretirement change. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 1050–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D., Kiger, G., & Mannon, S. (2005). Domestic labor and marital satisfaction: How much or how satisfied? Marriage and Family Review, 37, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P., Minnotte, K. L., & Kiger, G. (2004). Differences in work-to-family and family-to-work spillover among professional and nonprofessional workers. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P., Minnotte, K. L., Mannon, S. E., & Kiger, G. (2007). Examining the “neglected side of the work-family interface”: Antecedents of positive and negative family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suitor, J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. (1996). Rozzie and Harriet? Gender and family patterns of lesbian coparents. Gender & Society, 10, 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (1997). The division of housework among “remarried” couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O., Coltrane, S., McAnnally, L., & Altintas, E. (2009). Father-friendly policies and time use data in a cross-national context: Potential and prospects for future research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 234–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2001). Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology, 52, 331–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. (2000). Changes in housework after retirement: A panel study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toro-Morn, M. (1995). Gender, class, family, and migration: Puerto Rican women in Chicago. Gender & Society, 9, 712–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Income, earnings, and poverty from the 2004 American Community Survey (American Community Survey Reports, ACS-01). Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, R. L., Reidy, E. B., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. (2004). The daily consequences of widowhood: The role of gender and intergenerational transfers of subsequent housework performance. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 683–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. (1993). Marital happiness and household equity in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1993). Power and the accomplishment of gender. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender: Feminism on theory (pp. 151–174). New York: Aldine deGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, J., Ferree, M., & Ratcliff, K. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coltrane, S., Shih, K.Y. (2010). Gender and the Division of Labor. In: Chrisler, J., McCreary, D. (eds) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics