Advertisement

Cross-Cultural Research Methods and the Study of Gender

  • Gordon B. Forbes
Chapter

This chapter is intended to introduce researchers to the study of gender in a cross-cultural context. It describes the unique advantages of cross-cultural research and reviews the major theoretical and pragmatic issues associated with research in other cultures. The focus of the chapter is on the methodology and promise of cross-cultural research. It is not a review of the results of cross-cultural research on gender.

The term cross-cultural research probably produces mental images of distant locations and people whose language, dress, and worldview are much different than one’s own. Exotic cultures have long fascinated adventurers, but historically adventurers’ descriptions of exotic cultures were notoriously ethnocentric, judgmental, and racist (Hogan & Sussner, 2001).

Modern studies of culture began in the early part of the 20th century as both anthropology and psychology were struggling to establish the scientific basis of their disciplines. The study of gender united these fields...

Keywords

Body Dissatisfaction Gender Equality United Nations Development Programme Response Style Benevolent Sexism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beall, A. E. (1993). A social constructionist view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 127–147). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). Cross-cultural personality research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 170–189). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to methodology. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 2, pp. 1–28). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Best, D. L. (2001). Gender concepts: Convergence in cross-cultural research and methodologies. Cross-Cultural Research, 35, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boesch, E. E. (1996). The seven flaws of cross-cultural psychology: The story of conversion. Mind, Culture & Activity, 3, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Brislin, R. W. (1983). Cross-cultural research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translations of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of human mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In C. B. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 405–429). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Byrne, B. M. (1989). Multigroup comparisons and the assumption of equivalent construct validity across groups: Methodological and substantive issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  21. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Bermúdez, J., Maslach, C., & Ruch, W. (2000). Multivariate methods for the comparison of factor structures in cross-cultural research: An illustration with the big five questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Gan, Y., Song, W., et al. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (2006). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Church, A. T., & Lonner, W. J. (1998). The cross-cultural perspective in the study of personality: Rationale and current research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field studies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., et al. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54, 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (1996). Guide to cross-cultural research using the HRAP archive. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
  29. Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2001). Cross-cultural research methods. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ember, C. R., & Levinson, D. (1991). The substantive contributions of worldwide cross-cultural studies using secondary data. Behavioral Science Research, 25, 79–140.Google Scholar
  31. Ember, C. R., Ember, M., & Peregrine, P. N. (2002). Anthropology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Félix-Ortiz, M., Velázquez, J. A., Medina-Mora, M. E. V., & Newcomb, M. D. (2001). Adolescent drug use in Mexico and among Mexican American adolescents in the United States: Environmental influences and individual characteristics. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 27–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forbes, G. B., Zhang, X., Doroszewicz, K., & Haas, K. B. (2008). Relationships between individualism-collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect aggression: A study in China, Poland, and the United States. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating Disorder Inventory-2 professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  38. Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gergen, M. (2001). Feminist reconstructions in psychology: Narrative, gender, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 1115–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hatano, G. (1999). Is cultural psychology on the middle ground or farther? Human Development, 42, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harzing, A. (2006). Response styles in cross-national research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6, 237–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hogan, J. D., & Sussner, B. D. (2001). Cross-cultural psychology in historical perspective. In L. L. Adler & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Cross-cultural topics in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 15–28). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  49. Hopcroft, R. L., & Bradley, D. B. (2007). The sex difference in depression across 29 countries. Social Forces, 85, 1483–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jung, J., & Forbes, G. B. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among college women in China, South Korea, and the United States: Contrasting predictions from sociocultural and feminist theories. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kayano, M., Yoshiuchi, K., Al-Adawi, S., Viernes, N., Dorvlo, A. S. S., Kumano, H., et al. (2008). Eating attitudes and body dissatisfaction in adolescents: Cross-cultural study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 62, 17–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kilborn, B. (1982). Review of Spiro’s “Oedipus in the Trobriands.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55, 319–323.Google Scholar
  53. Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, U., Yang, K., & Hwang, K. (2006). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 3–25). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Kral, M. J., Burkhardt, K. J., & Kidd, S. (2002). A new research agenda for cultural psychology. Canadian Psychology, 43, 154–162.Google Scholar
  56. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1963). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  57. Laungani, P. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: A handmaiden to mainstream Western psychology. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 15, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lin, E. J., & Church, A. T. (2004). Are indigenous Chinese personality dimensions culture-specific? An investigation of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory in Chinese American and European American samples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lonner, W. J. (2005). The psychological study of culture: Issues and questions of enduring importance. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp. 9–29). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  60. Macionis, J. J. (2005). Sociology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Malinowski, B. (1985). Sex and repression in savage society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for Western civilization. Oxford: Morrow.Google Scholar
  65. Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  66. Miller, J. G. (1999). Cultural psychology: Implications for basic psychological theory. Psychological Science, 10, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  68. Murdock, G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  69. Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 763–784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Peña, E. D. (2007). Lost in translation: Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development, 78, 1255–1264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51, 918–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Phinney, J. S., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  76. Schlegel, A. (1989). Gender issues and cross-cultural research. Behavior Science Research, 23, 265–280.Google Scholar
  77. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Segall, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shanklin, E. (1994). Anthropology and race. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  80. Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singh, J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sinha, D. (1996). Culture as the target and culture as the source: A review of cross-cultural psychology in Asia. Psychology and Developing Societies, 8, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stern, E., & d’Epinay, R. L. (1947). Some polling experiences in Switzerland. Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Dialectics between cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Triandis, H. C., & Brislin, R. W. (1984). Cross-cultural psychology. American Psychologist, 39, 1006–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. United Nations Development Programme. (1995). Gender and human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of cultural anthropology (pp. 398–419). New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  94. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study (rev. ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  95. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon B. Forbes
    • 1
  1. 1.Millikin UniversityDecaturUSA

Personalised recommendations