Disseminating Research Findings to Service Providers and Communities

  • Jeffrey A. Kelly


Investigators are funded with the expectation that advances made in research will be actively shared with others, communicated to them, and thereby become part of the collective body of knowledge in the field. Findings reported in high-quality scientific journals remain a major benchmark of success for work supported by a research grant. There is a growing recognition, however, that funded researchers also have an obligation to disseminate results of their work to other constituencies, including taxpayers, who are the true funders of publicly supported research grants; service providers, who are the intended users of many public health research findings; and communities that either can directly benefit from research results or whose members made the work possible by participating in research studies. Only when your intervention program is being delivered to clients as part of a sustained effort will it have a positive impact on improving public health. This chapter focuses on the dissemination of grant research findings to service providers and to communities that are stakeholders in a research area. Through the steps discussed in this chapter, you can ensure that results and methods used in your research reach those practitioners, providers, service agencies, and public health agencies who can use them. This chapter will draw on examples from an HIV prevention project, although the same principles also hold true for other areas of public health intervention research.


Service Provider Agency Staff Successful Dissemination Provider Agency Continue Education Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by Center grant P30-MH52776 from the National Institute of Mental Health.


  1. Balas, E.A., & Boren, J.A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 65–70.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, A.O. (1979). Does continuing medical education improve the quality of medical care? A look at the evidence. Journal of Family Practice, 8, 1171–1174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertram, D.A., & Brook-Bertram, P.A. (1977). The evaluation of continuing medical education: A literature review. Health Education Monographs, 5, 330–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fairweather, G.W., & Tornatzsky, L.G. (1971). Experimental methods for social policy research. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  5. Geertsman, R.H., Parker, R.C., & Whitbourne, S.K. (1982). How physicians understand the process of changes in their practice behavior. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 752–761.Google Scholar
  6. Goldstein, E., Wrobel, J., Faigeles, B., & DeCarlo, P. (1998) Sources of information for HIV prevention program managers: a national survey. AIDS Education and Prevention, 10, 63–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haynes, R.B., David, D.A., McKibbon, A., & Tugwell, P. (1984). A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 549–556.Google Scholar
  8. Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.M., Parker, E.A., & Becker, A.B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalichman, S.C., Belcher, L., Cherry, C., & Williams, E. (1997). Primary prevention of sexually-transmitted HIV infection: Transferring behavioral research to community programs. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaluzny, A.D. (1974). Innovation in health services: Theoretical framework and review of research. Health Services Research, Summer Volume, 101–120.Google Scholar
  11. Kelly, J.A., Heckman, T.G., Stevenson, L.Y., Williams, P.N., Ertl, T., Hays, R.B., Leonard, N.R., O’Donnell, L., Terry, M.A., Sogolow, E.D., & Neumann, M.S. (2000). Transfer of research-based HIV prevention interventions to community service providers: fidelity and adaptation. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12(Supplement A), 87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly, J.A., Somlai, A.M., Benotsch, E.G., Amirkhanian, Y.A., Fernandez, M.I., Stevenson, L.Y., Sitzler, C.A., McAuliffe, T.L., Brown, K.D., & Opgenorth, K.M. (2006). Programmes, resources, and needs of HIV prevention nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Africa, Central/Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. AIDS Care, 18, 12–21. PMCID: PMC2265204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, J.A., Somlai, A.M., Benotsch, E.G., McAuliffe, T.L., Amirkhanian, Y.A., Brown, K.D., Stevenson, L.Y., Fernandez, M.I., Sitzler, C., Gore-Felton, C., Pinkerton, S.D., Weinhardt, L.S., & Opgenorth, K.M. (2004). Distance communication transfer of HIV prevention interventions to service providers. Science, 305, 1953–1955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly, J.A., Somlai, A.M., DiFranceisco, W.J., Otto-Salaj, L.L., McAuliffe, T.L., Hackl, K.L., Heckman, T.G., Holtgrave, D.R., & Rompa, D.J. (2000). Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1082–1088. PMCID: PMC1446305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly, J.A., Spielberg, F., & McAuliffe, T.L. (2008). Defining, designing, implementing, and evaluating Phase 4 HIV prevention effectiveness trials for vulnerable populations. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 47(Supplement 1), S28–S33. PMCID: PMC2409151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lounsburg, D., Rapkin, B., Marini, L., Jansky, E., & Massie, M.J. (2006). The community barometer: A breast health needs assessment tool for community-based organizations. Health Education and Behavior,33, 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Institutes of Health (February 11–13, 1997). Interventions to prevent HIV risk behaviors: Consensus development conference statement. Bethesda, MD: Office of Medical Applications of Research, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  18. Rapkin, B.D., & Trickett, E.J. (2005). Comprehensive dynamic trial designs for behavioral prevention research with communities: Overcoming inadequacies of the randomized controlled trial paradigm. In E.J. Trickett (Ed.), Community interventions and AIDS: Targeting the community context. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Somlai, A.M., Kelly, J.A., Otto-Salaj, L.L., McAuliffe, T.L., Hackl, K., DiFranceisco, W.J., Amick, B., Heckman, T.G., Holtgrve, D.R., & Rompa, D.J. (1999). Current HIV prevention activities for women and gay men among 77 ASOs. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 5, 23–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Soumerai, S.B., & Avorn, J. (1990). Principles of educational outreach (“academic detailing”) to improve clinical decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 549–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. West, S.G., Duan, N., Pequegnat, W., Gaist, P., Des Jarlais, D.C. Holtgrave, D., Szapocznik, J., Fishbein, M., Rapkin, B., Clatts, M., & Mullen, P.D. (2008). Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1359–1366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for AIDS Intervention Research (CAIR)Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations