Technology Transfer and Its Role in the Practice of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is very different from the other chapters in this book. Rather than addressing specific reproductive endocrinology and infertility diagnostic and therapeutic needs and situations, it is intended to help clinicians who come up with ideas that have the potential to improve the practice of reproductive endocrinology and infertility translate those ideas from bench to bedside.

Keywords

Invention commercialization Technology transfer Intellectual property Patents Copyrights Trademarks Trade secrets and mask works 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Jensen J, Wyller K, ER L, et al (2007) The role of public sector research in the discovery of new drugs. In: Annual meeting of the association of university technology managers. San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray F, Stern S (2007) Do formal intellecutal property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J Econ Behav Org 63(4):648-87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thursby J, Thursby M (2005) Pros and cons of faulty participation in licensing. In: University entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and technology transfer. JAI Press, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Causino N, Louis KS (1996) Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. N Eng J Med 335(23):1734-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mossinghoff G (1996) Remedies under patents on medical and surgical procedures. J Pat Trademark Off Soc 78:789-801Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malakoff D (2000) Patent prompts Rochester to sue for slice of drug profits. Science 288(5465):410-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waltz E (2007) Insdustry waits for the fallout from cabilly. Nat Biotechnol 25(7):699-700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    US Pattent and Trademark Office (2008) http://www.uspto.gov/main/glossary/index.html#i. Accessed 27 Oct 2008)
  12. 12.
    Jansen C, Dillon H (1999) Where do the leads come from? Source data from six institutions. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers. XI.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    http://www.yet2.com/app/about/home. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 2008
  15. 15.
    http://www.utekcorp.com/. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 08
  16. 16.
    http://www.masstechportal.org/. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 2008
  17. 17.
    http://www.ibridgenetwork.org/. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 2008
  18. 18.
    Goldscheider R, Jarosz J, Mulhern C (2002) Use of the 25% Rule in valuing IP. Les Nouvelles:1233-1313.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    http://www.odod.state.oh.us/OSB.htm. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 08
  20. 20.
    http://www.benfranklin.org/. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 08
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    http://www.sba.gov/SBIR/indexsbir-sttr.html. 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Technology Entrepreneurship and Commercialization School of Management and Technology TransferBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations