Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Medical Neuropsychology

Abstract

The goal of any rehabilitation application should be to improve the adaptive functioning of people in the setting in which they will be living or working. Accommodation for impairments is often a critical variable in the success of rehabilitation efforts. This chapter will review current rehabilitation methods for sensory and motor functioning; cognitive functioning, including deficits in attention, memory, language, and executive functions; and some recent technical additions to rehabilitation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sohlberg MM. Review article: evidence-based instructional techniques for training procedures and knowledge in persons with severe memory impairment. Revisita de Neuropsicologia. 2006;1(1):14–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy M, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Sohlberg MM, Yorkston K, Chiou H, Kahn PF. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;iFirst :1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomized control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:477–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cicerone KD. Remediation of working attention in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:185–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine B, Stuss D, Milberg W, Alexander M, Schwartz M, Macdonald R. The effects of focal and diffuse brain damage on strategy application: evidence from focal lesions, traumatic brain injury and normal aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:247–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raskin S, Gordon W. The impact of different approaches to remediation on generalization. NeuroRehabilitation. 1992;2:38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon W. Methodological considerations in cognitive remediation. In: Meier M, Benton A, Diller L, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sohlberg MM, Raskin SA. Principles of Generalization applied to attention & memory interventions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11(2):65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stokes T, Baer D. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10:349–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson JACT. A simple theory of complex cognition. Am Psychol. 1996;51:355–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raskin S, Mateer C. Neuropsychological management of mild traumatic brain injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Brain plasticity and behavior. Ann Rev Psychol. 1998;49:43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mark VW, Taub E, Morris DM. Neuralplasticity and constraint-induced movement therapy. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42:269–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris D, Taub E, Mark, V. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42(3):257–68.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1406–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wernig A, Müller S. Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia. 1992;30:229–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz MM, Seltzer JC, Fujimoto M, Shagan DS, Wexler BE. Predictors of change in life skills in schizophrenia after cognitive remediation. Schizophr Res. 2009;107:267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurz A, Pohl C, Ramsenthaler M, Sorg C. Cognitive Rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Given BK, Wasserman JD, Chari SA, Beattie K, Eden GF. A randomized, controlled study of computer-based intervention in middle school struggling readers. Brain Lang. 2008;106:83–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson IH, Tegner R, Tham K, Lo A, Nimmo-Smith I. Sustained attention training for unilateral negelct: theoretical and rehabilitation implications. J Clin Exp Psychol. 1995;17:416–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robertson IH, McMillan TM, MacLeod E, Edgeworth J, Brock D. Rehabilitation by limb activation training (LAT) reduces impairment in unilateral neglect patients: a single-blind randomised control trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002;12:439–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sohlberg MM, Mateer C. Effectiveness of an attention training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;19:117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rohling M, Faust M, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:20–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Attention process training. Puyallup, WA: Association for Neuropsychological Research and Development; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sohlberg MM, et al. Attention process training II: a program to address attentional deficits for persons with mild cognitive dysfunction. Puyallup, WA: Association for Neuropsychological Research and Development; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson JB, Kerns KA, Seidenstrang L, Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Pay attention! A children’s attention process training program. Wake Forest, NC: Lash & Associates Publishing/Training Inc; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michel JA, Mateer CA. Attention rehabilitation following stroke and traumatic brain injury. A review. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42(1):59–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Evaluation of a remedial programme for attentional deficits following closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10:693–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomized control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:477–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, Evans J, Watson P. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:891–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Teasdale T, Emslie H, Quirk K, Evans J, Fish J, Wilson BA. Alleviation of career strain during the use of the NeuroPage device by people with acquired brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:781–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sohlberg MM. External aids: expanding our understanding of the most widely used memory rehabilitation technique. In: High W, Sander AM, Struchen MA, Hart KA, editors. Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. New York, NY: Oxford Press; 2005. pp. 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sohlberg MM, Kennedy M, Avery JM, Coelho C, Turkstra LM, Ylvisaker M, Yorkston K. Practice guidelines for external aids for memory rehabilitation. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;15(1):xv–ii.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hart T, Hawkey K, Whyte J. Use of a portable Voice Organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a within-subjects trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17(6):556–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Fahy JF, Whelan JP, Long CJ. Memory remediation after severe closed head injury: notebook training versus supportive therapy. J Clin Consult Psychol. 1995;63(3):484–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Tulving E. Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986;8(3):292–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hunkin NA, Parkin AJ. The method of vanishing cues: an evaluation of its effectiveness in teaching memory impaired individuals. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(10):1255–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson BA, Baddeley A, Evans J, Shiel A. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1994;4(3):307–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tailby R, Haslam C. An investigation of errorless learning in memory-impaired patients: improve the technique and clarifying the theory. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1230–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kern RS, Green MF, Mitchell S, Kopelowicz A, Mintz J, Liberman RP. Extensions of errorless learning for social problem-solving deficits in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(3):513–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cherry KE, Simmons SS, Camp CJ. Spaced retrieval enhances memory in older adults with probable Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Geropsychol. 1999;5(3): 159–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brush J, Camp C. Using spaced retrieval as an intervention during speech-language therapy. Clin Gerontol. 1998;19(1):51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Takashim A, Nieuwenhuis I, Rijpkema M, Petersson KM, Jensen O, Fernandez G. Memory trace stabilization leads to large-scale changes in the retrieval network: a functional MRI study on associative memory. Learn Mem. 2007;14:472–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Raskin S, Sohlberg MM. Prospective memory intervention: a review and evaluation of a pilot restorative intervention. Brain Impair. 2009;10:76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Raskin S, Sohlberg M. An investigation of prospective memory training in two individuals with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kurtz M, Moberg P, Mozley L, Swanson C, Gur R, Gur R. Effectiveness of an attention- and memory-training program on neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinsella G, Ong B, Storey E, Wallace J, Hester R. Elaborated spaced-retrieval and prospective memory in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17:688–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Franzen M, Haut M. The psychological treatment of memory impairment: a review of empirical studies. Neuropsychol Rev. 1991;2:29–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Goldstein G, et al. Efficacy of memory training: a technological extension and replication. Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;10:66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Twum M, Parente R. Role of imagery and verbal labeling in the performance of paired associate tasks by persons with closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16: 630–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Komatsu S, Mimura M, Kato M, Wakamatsu N, Kashima H. Errorless and effortful processes involved in the learning of face-name associations by patients with alcoholic Korsakoff’s Syndrome. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10(2):113–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lawson M, Rice D. Effects of training in use of executive strategies on a verbal memory problem resulting from closed head injury. J Clin Exp Psychol. 1989;11:842–54.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wilson BA. Rehabilitation of memory. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ehlhardt L, Sohlberg MM, Glang A, Albin R. TEACH-M: a pilot study evaluating an instructional sequence for persons with impaired memory and executive functions. Brain Inj. 2005;19(8):569–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Coelho CA, Mchugh RE, Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: a replication. Aphasiology. 2000;14:133–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Drew RL, Thompson CK. Model-based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1999;42:972–89.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Helm-Estabrooks N, Ramsberger G. Treatment of agrammatism in long-term Broca’s aphasia. Br J Commun Disord. 1986;21:39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Alberts ML, Sparks RW, Helm NA. Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1973;29:130–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li EC, Kitselman K, Dusatko D, Spinelli C. The efficacy of PACE in the remediation of naming deficits. J Commun Disord. 1998;21:111–23.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lillie R, Mateer CA. Constraint-based therapies as a proposed model for cognitive rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(2):119–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, Taub E. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia following stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Maher LM, Kendall D, Swearengin JA, Rodriguez A, Leon SA, Pingel K, Holland A, Rothi LJG. A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:843–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Maher LM, Schmadeke S, Swearengin J, Rothi LJG. Intensity variation for constraint induced language therapy for aphasia. The ASHA Leader: 2005; Convention Program, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shaywitz B, Shaywitz S, Blachman B, Pugh K, Fulbright R, Skudlarski P, et al. Development of left occipito-temporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;55:926–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Richards T, Berninger V. Abnormal fMRI connectivity in children with dyslexia during a phoneme task: before but not after treatment 1. J Neurolinguistics. 2008;21:294–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Temple E, Poldrack R, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Salz T, Tallal P, et al. Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:13907–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Temple E, Deutsch G, Poldrack R, Miller S, Tallal P, Merzenich M, et al. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from fMRI. PNAS. 2000;100(5):2860–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gillam R, Loeb D, Hoffman L, Bohman T, Champlin C, Thibodeau L, Widen J, Brandel J, Friel-Patti S. The efficacy of Fast ForWord language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:97–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Alderman N, Fry R, Youngson H. Improvement in self-monitoring skills, reduction of behavior disturbance and the dysexecutive syndrome: comparison of response cost and a new programme of self-monitoring training. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1995;5:193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sohlberg MM, Sprunk H, Metzelaar K. Efficacy of an external cuing system in an individual with severe frontal lobe damage. Cogn Rehabil. 1988;4:36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Geyer S. Training executive function skills. Puyallup, WA: Good Samaritan Hospital; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cicerone K, Levin H, Malec J, Stuss D, Whyte J. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(7):1212–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen P, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlstrom K, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych. 2005;44:177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Westerg H, Klingberg T. Changes in cortical activity after training of working memory—a single subject analysis. Physiol Behav. 2007;92:186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Stablum F, Umiltà C, Mogentale C, Carlan M, Guerrini C. Rehabilitation of executive deficits in closed head injury and anterior communicating artery aneurysm patients. Psychol Res. 2000;63:265–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Stuss D, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Ann Rev Psychol. 2006;53:401–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Cicerone K, Wood J. Planning disorder after closed head injury: a case study. Arch Phy Med Rehabil. 1987;68: 111–5.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Cicerone K, Giacino J. Remediation of executive function deficits after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1992;2:12–2.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Onsworth T, McFarland K, Young R. Self-awareness and psychosocial functioning following traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of a group support programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10:465–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Von Cramon D, Matthes-Von Cramon G, Mai N. Problem solving deficits in brain injured patients: a therapeutic approach. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Marshall RC, Karow CM, Morelli CA, Iden KK, Dixon J, Cranfill TB. Effects of interactive strategy modelling training on problem-solving by persons with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2004;18(8):659–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, Carter G, Hong J, Wilson BA, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of Goal Management Training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:299–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gordon WA, Cantor J, Ashman T, Brown M. Treatment of post-TBI executive dysfunction: application of theory to clinical practice. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:156–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sohlbert MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: an integrative neuropsychological approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Jobe JB, Smith DM, Ball K, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Willis SL, et al. ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22:453–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wolinsky FD, Unvrezagt FW, Smith DM, Jones R, Wright E, Tennstedt SL. The effects of ACTIVE cognitive training trial on clinically relelvant declines in health-related quality of life. J Gerontol B Psychol Soc Sci. 2006;61:S281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Flanagan S, Cantor J, Ashman T. Traumatic brain injury: future assessment tools and treatment prospects. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;5:877–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Crosbie J, Lennon S, Basford J, McDonough S. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Rose F, Brooks M, Rizzo A. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:241–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Brooks B, Rose F. The use of virtual reality in memory rehabilitation: current findings and future directions. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18:147–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Adams R, Finn P, Moes E, Flannery K, Rizzo A. Distractibility in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the virtual reality classroom. Child Neuropsychol. 2009;15:120–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Parsons T, Bowerly T, Buckwalter J, Rizzo A. A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychol. 2007;13:363–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Birbaumer N, Cohen L. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol. 2007;579:621–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Birbaumer N. Human brain-computer interface (BCI). In: Riehle A, Vaadia E, editors. Motor cortex in voluntary movements. A distributed system for distributed functions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005. pp. 367–401.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neural ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006;442:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen L. Influence of interhemispheric. Interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Robertson IH, Murre JJ. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(5):544–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sohlberg MM, McLaughlin KA, Pavese A, Heidrich A, Posner MI. Evaluation of attention process training and brain injury education in persons with acquired brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22(5):656–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Kalmer K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA

    Sarah A. Raskin

Authors
  1. Sarah A. Raskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Raskin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Market Street 3535, Philadelphia, 19104, USA

    Carol L. Armstrong

  2. Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, 15213, USA

    Lisa Morrow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raskin, S.A. (2010). Current Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation. In: Armstrong, C., Morrow, L. (eds) Handbook of Medical Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1364-7_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation