Human Factors Engineering: Targeting Systems for Change

  • Mary E. Sesto
  • Amye J. Tevaarwerk
  • Douglas A. Wiegmann


In 2003, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Office of Cancer Survivorship estimated that cancer survivors represented nearly 4% of the US population. This number is expected to grow dramatically over time [1, 2]. As a group, cancer survivors represent a disparate population. Survivors include a broad range of ages (infants to octogenarians), disease types (acute leukemias to neuroendocrine tumors), disease severity (localized versus metastatic), and treatments received (observation, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, stem cell transplant, etc.). However, certain challenges are universal: cancer treatment is generally complex, extends over long periods of time, may have persistent long-term and late effects, and often requires follow-up surveillance. These characteristics necessitate close attention to coordination and transfers of care.


Cancer Survivor Zoledronic Acid Health Information Technology Chronic Care Model Survivor Care Plan 


  1. 1.
    Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Bruinooge S, Goldstein M. Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3(2):79–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yabroff K, Lawrence W, Clauser S, Davis W, Brown M. Burden of illness in cancer survivors: findings from a population-based national sample. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(17):1322–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miedema B, MacDonald I, Tatemichi S. Cancer follow-up care. Patients’ perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2003;49:890–5.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nissen M, Beran M, Lee M, Mehta S, Pine D, Swenson K. Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med. 2007;39(7):477–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson JR. Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(6):557–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salvendy G, editor. Hand book of human factors and ergonomics. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wickens C, Gordons S, Liu Y. An introduction to human factors engineering. New York: Addison-Wesley; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirwan B. An overview of a nuclear reprocessing plant Human Factors programme. Appl Ergon. 2003;34(5):441–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker K, Olson J, Morisseau D. Work practices, fatigue, and nuclear power plant safety performance. Hum Factors. 1994;36(2):244–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleiner BM. Macroergonomic analysis and design for improved safety and quality performance. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 1999;5(2):217–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shappell S, Detwiler C, Holcomb K, Hackworth C, Boquet A, Wiegmann DA. Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Hum Factors. 2007;49(2):227–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tvaryanas AP, Thompson WT, Constable SH. Human factors in remotely piloted aircraft operations: HFACS analysis of 221 mishaps over 10 years. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006;77(7):724–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Human error and crew resource management failures in Naval aviation mishaps: a review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990–96. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999;70(12):1147–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS). Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001;72(11):1006–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system. Aldershot; Burlington: Ashgate; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Erp JB, Eriksson L, Levin B, Carlander O, Veltman JA, Vos WK. Tactile cueing effects on performance in simulated aerial combat with high acceleration. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78(12):1128–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stanton N. Human factors in nuclear safety. Bristol: Taylor & Francis; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanders MS, McCormick EJ. Human factors in engineering and design. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giuliano KK. Basic strategies for reviewing medical device research. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008;19(3):258–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hallbeck MS, Koneczny S, Buchel D, Matern U. Ergonomic usability testing of operating room devices. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:147–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pattison M, McQuaid H, Wilcox A. Incorporating human factors in product design and development. Med Device Technol. 2007;18(7):28. 30, 23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perry SJ. An overlooked alliance: using human factors engineering to reduce patient harm. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30(8):455–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Privitera MB, Design M, Murray DL. Applied ergonomics: determining user needs in medical device design. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:5606–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bates D, Gawande A. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2526–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hesse BW, Hanna C, Massett HA, Hesse NK. Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):81–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walker JM, Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karsh B. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(5):388–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karsh BT, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Or CK. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1:i59–65.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1:i50–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carayon P. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1578–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker S, Chang A, Darzi A. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):475–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karsh BT, Brown R. Macroergonomics and patient safety: the impact of levels on theory, measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(5):674–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karsh BT, Escoto KH, Beasley JW, Holden RJ. Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(3):283–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Silver MP, Geis MS, Bateman KA. Improving health care systems performance: a human factors approach. Am J Med Qual. 2004;19(3):93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cacciabue PC, Vella G. Human factors engineering in healthcare systems: the problem of human error and accident management. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(4):e1–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(7):435–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Owens BH, Robbins KC. CHESS: comprehensive health enhancement support system for women with breast cancer. Plast Surg Nurs. 1996;16(3):172–5. 82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reid PR, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G, National Academy of Engineering., Institute of Medicine, et al. Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reason JT. Human error. London: Cambridge University Press; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reason J. Heroic compensations: the benign face of the human factor. Flight Safety Australia. 2001;28–31.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Forbes JF, Cuzick J, Buzdar A, Howell A, Tobias JS, Baum M. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(1):45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Coombes RC, Kilburn LS, Snowdon CF, Paridaens R, Coleman RE, Jones SE, et al. Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years’ tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9561):559–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chlebowski RT, Geller ML. Adherence to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Oncology. 2006;71(1–2):1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dezentje VO, van Blijderveen NJ, Gelderblom H, Putter H, van Herk-Sukel MP, Casparie MK, et al. Effect of concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use and tamoxifen adherence on breast cancer recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2423–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kaye R, Crowley J. Medical device use safety: incorporating human factors engineering into risk management. Guidance for industry and FDA premarked and design control reviewers. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Division of Device User Programs and Systems Analysis, Office of Health Industry Program. Rockville; 2000.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Joint Commission on Healthcare Quality and Safety. Sentinel event statistics, 2006. Retrieved from
  51. 51.
    Carlton G, Blegen MA. Medication-related errors: a literature review of incidence and antecedents. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2006;24:19–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Weaver J, McHugo JM, Clark TJ. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with post-menopausal bleeding on tamoxifen. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(929):394–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vicente KJ. Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Carayon P. Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(4):525–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Friedman TL. The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2005.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    O’Hair D, Villagran MM, Wittenberg E, Brown K, Ferguson M, Hall HT, et al. Cancer survivorship and agency model: implications for patient choice, decision making, and influence. Health Commun. 2003;15(2):193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wagner E, Davis C, Schaefer J, Von Korff M, Austin B. A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: are they consistent with the literature? Manag Care Q. 1999;7(3):56–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wagner E, Austin B, Von Korff M. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q. 1996;4(2):12–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1909–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hewitt ME, Ganz P, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, National Cancer Policy Forum, National Cancer Institute, Lance Armstrong Foundation, et al. Implementing cancer survivorship care planning: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ganz P. Survivorship: adult cancer survivors. Prim Care. 2009;36(4):721–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ganz PA, Hahn EE. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):759–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology – Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Plan 2009. Retrieved from
  66. 66.
    Hill-Kayser C, Vachani C, Hampshire M, Jacobs L, Metz J. An internet tool for creation of cancer survivorship care plans for survivors and health care providers: design, implementation, use and user satisfaction. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e39.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ganz P. Monitoring the physical health of cancer survivors: a survivorship-focused medical history. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(32):5105–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mao JJ, Bowman MA, Stricker CT, DeMichele A, Jacobs L, Chan D, et al. Delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: the perspective of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):933–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kantsiper M, McDonald EL, Geller G, Shockney L, Snyder C, Wolff AC. Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:S459–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E. Sesto
    • 1
  • Amye J. Tevaarwerk
  • Douglas A. Wiegmann
  1. 1.Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Orthopedics, Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations