Abstract
Learning to conduct an effective interview is essential to carrying out almost any form of clinical assessment or intervention. However, the unpredictability of the interviewing process can make mastery of this skill a challenging and, at times, even discouraging task. Each client introduces into the interview situation, unique characteristics that limit the therapist’s ability to control the direction of the interview. The most common complication is client defensiveness, which prevents the interview from unfolding predictably and straightforwardly. Therefore, an adequate understanding of defenses is essential for competency in interviewing. If interviewers do not understand defensiveness and how to effectively respond to it, the clinical interview is likely to be, at best, frustrating and, at worst, a pointless enterprise for both participants.
Clinical activities are most productive when there is collaboration between practitioner and client. Defensive reactions can be easily misread by clinicians as a refusal or failure to take part in a cooperative effort (Teyber, 1997). Therapists may wonder, “if clients really want help, why are they so difficult, antagonistic, and evasive?” Such perceptions may elicit irritation, causing therapists to become more confrontational and forceful in pressing for a straightforward response from the client. Almost invariably, this approach has the opposite effect, and the situation rapidly grows increasingly unproductive (Lankton & Lankton, 1983; Vaillant, 1992).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Appendix B: Defensive Functioning Scale. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.
Benjamin, L. S. (1995). Good defenses make good neighbors. In H. R. Conte & R. Plutchik (Eds.), Ego defenses: Theory and measurement (pp. 53–78). New York: Wiley.
Bowins, B. (2004). Psychological defense mechanisms: A new perspective. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 1–26.
Bowins, B. (2006). How psychiatric treatments can enhance psychological defense mechanisms. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66, 173–194.
Cramer, P., & Jones, C. J. (2007). Defense mechanisms predict differential lifespan changes in self-control and self-acceptance. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 841–855.
Lankton, S. R., & Lankton, C. H. (1983). The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York: Brunner-Mazel.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.
McCabe, R., & Priebe, S. (2004). The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: A review of methods and findings. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 50, 115–128.
Teyber, E. (1997). Interpersonal process in psychotherapy: A relational approach (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Vaillant, G. E. (1992). The clinical management of immature defenses in the treatment of individuals with personality disorders. In G. E. Vaillant (Ed.), Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicians and researchers (pp. 59–86). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gold, S.N., Castillo, Y. (2010). Dealing with Defenses and Defensiveness in Interviews. In: Segal, D., Hersen, M. (eds) Diagnostic Interviewing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1320-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1320-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1319-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1320-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)