Intelligent Modeling Essential to Get Good Results

  • Katta G. Murty
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 137)


Operations Research/Management Science (OR/MS) theory has developed efficient algorithms for solving some single-objective optimization models that are highly structured.

In real-world applications, decision problems tend to have many complex features, uncertainty influencing many important aspects, and several other complications. Constructing a mathematical model to find an optimum decision in such problems is often a very difficult task that requires a lot of skill. The trouble is that none of the models discussed in OR theory may fit perfectly the problem you need to solve. As Wolfram (2002) suggests “… the idea of describing behavior in terms of mathematical equations works well where the behavior is fairly simple. It almost inevitably fails whenever the behavior is more complex.”


Planning Period Container Terminal Integer Programming Model Quay Crane Simple Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ackoff R (1996) The future of operational research is past. J Oper Res Soc 30(2):93–104Google Scholar
  2. Dantzig GB (1990) The diet problem. Interfaces 20(4):43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ford LR, Fulkerson DR (1962) Flows in networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Fulkerson DR (1956) Note on Dilworth’s decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets. Proc Am Math Soc 7:701–702Google Scholar
  5. Geoffrion AM (1976) The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers. Interfaces 7(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Murty KG (1992) Network programming. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Murty KG (2007) Yard crane pools and optimum layouts of container terminals. J Ind Syst Eng 1(3):190–199; can be downloaded from website: Google Scholar
  8. Murty KG, Djang PA (1999) The U.S. Army National Guard’s Mobile Training Simulators location and routing Problem. Oper Res 47(2):175–182Google Scholar
  9. Murty KG, Kim WJ (2006) An i-DMSS based on bipartite matching and heuristics for rental bus allocation, In: Gupta J, Mora M, Forgionne G (eds) Intelligent decision making support systems. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Murty KG, liu J, Wan Y-W, Lin R (2005a) A DSS (decision support system) for operations in a container terminal. Decision Support Syst 39(3):309–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murty KG, Wan Y-W, Liu J, Tseng MM, Leung E, Lai KK, Chiu HWC (2005b) Hongkong International Terminals gains elastic capacity using a data-intensive decision-support system. Interfaces 35(1):61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petering MEH, Murty KG (2009) Effect of block length and yard crane deployment systems on overall performance at a seaport container transshipment terminal. Comput Oper Res 36:1711-1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simon H (1987) Two heads are better than one: the collaboration between AI and OR. Interfaces 17:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolfram (2002) New kind of sciences. Wolfram Media, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  15. Yu VF, Murty KG, Wan Y-W, Dann J, Lee R (2009) Developing a DSS for allocating gates to flights at an international airport. Int J Decision Support Syst Technol 1(1):46–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang C, Liu J, Wan Y-W, Murty KG, Linn R (2003) Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transport Res B Methodol 37(10):883–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Industrial and Operations EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Systems Engineering DepartmentKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations