Advertisement

Future Directions for Research on Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention

  • Michael T. Bardo
  • Richard Milich
  • Diana H. Fishbein
Chapter

Abstract

Drug abuse is characterized not simply by abnormalities in reward seeking and compulsive use, but also a failure in inhibitory control. The mechanisms of reward seeking and behavioral inhibition are dissociable at the levels of genetic, neurobiological, and personality measurements. Social influences also play a key role in moderating the relationship between inhibitory processes and drug use. This concluding chapter extracts some of the key developments in this research area highlighted in each of the foregoing chapters and points out future challenges in harnessing this knowledge to find utility in the design and implementation of effective anti-drug prevention intervention strategies. General principles may also be derived for application to other health risk-related behaviors during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood.

Keywords

Inhibitory Control Foster Care Behavioral Inhibition Sensation Seek Impulsive Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albert D, Steinberg L (2011) Peer Influences on Adolescent Risk Behavior. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkley R, Murphy K, Fischer M (2008) ADHD in adults: What the Science says. The Guildford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bierman KL (1996) Integrating social-skills training interventions with parent training and family-focused support to prevent conduct disorder in high-risk populations. The Fast Track Multisite Demonstration Project. The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Ann N Y Acad Sci 794:256–64.Google Scholar
  4. Biglan A, Fishbein D (2011) Implications for Translational Prevention Research: Science, Policy and Advocacy. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrion VG, Weems CF, Eliez S, Patwardhan A, Brown W, Ray RD, Reiss AL (2001) Attenuation of frontal asymmetry in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 50:943–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Taylor A, Poulton R (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297:851–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Churchwell J, Yurgelun-Todd D (2011) Neuroimaging, Adolescence and Risky Behavior. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrod PJ, Stewart SH, Comeau N, Maclean AM (2006) Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 35:550–63. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_6 Google Scholar
  9. Cyders MA, Flory K, Rainer S, Smith GT (2009) The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking. Addiction 104:193–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02434.x Google Scholar
  10. De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Spencer S, Hall J (2000) N-Acetylaspartate concentration in the anterior cingulate of maltreated children and adolescents with PTSD. Am J Psychiatry 157:1175–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Wit H (2009) Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol 14:22–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x Google Scholar
  12. de Wit H, Richards JB (2004) Dual determinants of drug use in humans: reward and impulsivity. Nebr Symp Motiv 50:19–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion TJ, Felver-Gant J, Abdullaev Y, Posner M (2011) Self-Regulation and Adolescent Drug Abuse: Translating Developmental Science and Neuroscience into Prevention Practice. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dishion TJ, McCord J, Poulin F (1999) When interventions harm. Peer groups and problem behavior. Am Psychol 54:755–64Google Scholar
  15. Doremus-Fitzwater TL, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2010) Motivational systems in adolescence: possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors. Brain Cogn 72:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.008 Google Scholar
  16. Fillmore M, Weafer J (2011) Impaired Inhibitory Control as a Mechanism of Drug Abuse. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fishbein D (2000) The importance of neurobiological research to the prevention of psychopathology. Prev Sci 1:89–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher P, Bruce J, Abdullaev Y, Mannering A, Pears K (2011) Implications of Effects of Adversity on Development of Inhibitory Control for Design of Preventive Interventions and Potential Recovery of Function. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginexi E, Robertson E (2011) Translating Research on Inhibitory Control for the Prevention of Drug Abuse. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldman D, Oroszi G, Ducci F (2005) The genetics of addictions: uncovering the genes. Nat Rev Genet 6:521–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gullo M, Dawe S, McHugh M (2011) Impulsivity and adolescent substance use: From self-report measures to neuroimaging and beyond. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gunnar MR, Fisher PA (2006) Bringing basic research on early experience and stress neurobiology to bear on preventive interventions for neglected and maltreated children. Dev Psychopathol 18:651–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivanov I, Newcorn J, Morton K, Tricamo M (2011) Inhibitory control deficits in childhood: Definition, measurement, and clinical risk for substance use disorders. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs M, Jutras-Aswad D, DiNieri J, Tomasiewicz H, Hurd Y (2011) Genetic and environmental determinants of addiction risk related to impulsivity and its neurobiological substrates. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Jentsch J, Groman S, James A, Seu E (2011) Monaminergic Regulation of Cognitive Control in Laboratory Animals. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaffman A, Meaney MJ (2007) Neurodevelopmental sequelae of postnatal maternal care in rodents: clinical and research implications of molecular insights. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48:224–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469–7610.2007.01730.x Google Scholar
  27. Lambert NM, Hartsough CS (1998) Prospective study of tobacco smoking and substance ­depen­den­cies among samples of ADHD and non-ADHD participants. J Learn Disabil 31:533–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopez B, Schwartz SJ, Prado G, Campo AE, Pantin H (2008) Adolescent neurological development and its implications for adolescent substance use prevention. J Prim Prev 29:5–35. doi: 10.1007/s10935–007–0119–3 Google Scholar
  29. Lynam D (2011) Inhibitory control as predictor for conduct disorders. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynam DR, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Wikstrom PO, Loeber R, Novak S (2000) The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: the effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. J Abnorm Psychol 109:563–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacPherson L, Richards J, Anahi Collado C (2011) A Functional Analytic Framework for Understanding Adolescent Risk Taking Behavior. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Molina BS, Hinshaw SP, Swanson JM, Arnold LE, Vitiello B, Jensen PS, Epstein JN, Hoza B, Hechtman L, Abikoff HB, Elliott GR, Greenhill LL, Newcorn JH, Wells KC, Wigal T, Gibbons RD, Hur K, Houck PR (2009) The MTA at 8 years: prospective follow-up of children treated for combined-type ADHD in a multisite study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:484–500. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c23d0 Google Scholar
  34. Pelham WE, Jr., Fabiano GA (2008) Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37:184–214. doi: 10.1080/15374410701818681 Google Scholar
  35. Perry JL, Carroll ME (2008) The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 200:1–26. doi: 10.1007/s00213–008–1173–0
  36. Richards JB, Gancarz A, Hawk Jr L (2011) Animal Models of Behavioral Processes that Underlie the Occurrence of Impulsice Behaviors in Humans. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Riggs N, Greenberg MT, Rhoades B (2011) Early Risk for Problem Behavior and Substance Use: Targeted interventions for the promotion of inhibitory control. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Shedler J, Block J (1990) Adolescent drug use and psychological health. A longitudinal inquiry. Am Psychol 45:612–30Google Scholar
  39. Slough NM, McMahon RJ, Bierman KL, Coie JD, Dodge KA, Foster EM, Greenberg MT, Lochman JE, Pinderhughes EE (2008) Preventing Serious Conduct Problems in School-Age Youths: The Fast Track Program. Cogn Behav Pract 15:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2007.04.002
  40. Stairs DJ, Bardo MT (2009) Neurobehavioral effects of environmental enrichment and drug abuse vulnerability. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:377–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.016 Google Scholar
  41. Trad PV (1993) The ability of adolescents to predict future outcome. Part I: Assessing predictive abilities. Adolescence 28:533–55Google Scholar
  42. Verdejo-Garcia A, Bechara A, Recknor EC, Perez-Garcia M (2007) Negative emotion-driven impulsivity predicts substance dependence problems. Drug Alcohol Depend 91:213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.025 Google Scholar
  43. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR (2003) Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:210–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman R, Donohew R, Palmgreen P, Noar S, Cupp P, Floyd B (2011) Designing media and classroom interventions targeting high sensation seeking or impulsive adolescents to prevent drug abuse and risky sexual behavior. In: Bardo MT, Fishbein D, Milich R (eds) Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael T. Bardo
    • 1
  • Richard Milich
  • Diana H. Fishbein
  1. 1.Center for Drug Abuse Research TranslationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations