Peer Influences on Adolescent Risk Behavior

Chapter

Abstract

Moving beyond studies of age differences in “cool” cognitive ­processes related to risk perception and reasoning, new approaches to understanding ­adolescent risk behavior highlight the influence of “hot” social and emotional ­factors on adolescents’ decisions. Building on evidence from developmental neuroscience, we present a theory that highlights an adolescent gap in the developmental timing of neurobehavioral systems underpinning incentive processing and cognitive control. Whereas changes in brain regions involved in incentive processing result in heightened sensitivity to social and emotional rewards in early adolescence, cognitive control systems do not reach full maturity until late adolescence or early adulthood. Within this framework, middle adolescence represents a window of heightened vulnerability to peer influences toward risk-taking behavior. At a time when adolescents spend an increasing amount of time with peers, research suggests that exposure to peer-related stimuli sensitizes the reward system to the reward value of risky behavior. As the cognitive control system gradually matures, adolescents gain the capacity to exercise self-regulation in socio-emotionally challenging situations, reflected by an increasing capacity to resist peer influence.

Keywords

Dopamine Cortisol Oxytocin 

References

  1. Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azjen, L., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewod Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, M.H. (1990). Theoretical models of adherence and strategies for improving adherence. In S.A. Shumaker, E.B. Schron, J.K. Ockene, C.T. Parker, J.L. Probstfield, & J.M. Wolle (Eds.), Handbook of behavior change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bjork, J.M., Knutson, B., Fong, G.W., Caggiano, D.M., Bennett, S.M., & Hommer, D.W. (2004). Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1793–1802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakemore, S. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 267–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, B.J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cauffman, E., Shulman, E., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2010). Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental Psychology, 46, 193–207. Google Scholar
  9. Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (in press). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
  10. Crone, E.A., Wendelken, C., Donohue, S.E., Van Leijenhorst, L., & Bunge, S.A. (2006). Neurocognitive development of the ability to manipulate information in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9325–9330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M, Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chassin, L., Hussong, A., & Beltran, I. (2009). Adolescent substance use. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, Vol.1. (3rd ed.) (pp. 723–763). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, R.E., & Gunnar, M.R. (2009). Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: Implications for psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Durston, S., Davidson, M., Tottenham, N., Galvan, A., Spicer, J., Fossella, J., et al. (2006). A shift from diffuse to focal activity with development. Developmental Science, 9, 1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernst, M., Nelson, E., Jazbec, S., McClure, E., Monk, C., Blair, R., et al. (2004). Choice selection and reward anticipation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1585–1597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Figner, B., Mackinlay, R.J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E.U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709–730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischhoff, B. (2008). Assessing adolescent decision-making competence. Developmental Review, 28, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galvan, A., Hare, T., Parra, C., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B.J. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to the orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6885–6892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner. M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giedd, J.N. (2008). The teen brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 335–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosbras, M., Jansen, M., Leonard, G., McIntosh, A., Osswald, K., Poulsen, C., et al. (2007). Neural mechanisms of resistance to peer influence in early adolescence. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 8040–8045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Insel, T., & Fernald, R. (2004). How the brain processes social information: Searching for the social brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 697–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaccard, J., Blanton, H., & Dodge, T. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology, 41, 135–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S.L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, E.J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knoch, D., Gianotti, L., Pascual-Leone, A., Treyer, V., Regard, M., Hohmann, M., et al. (2006). Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6469–6472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laviola, G., Pascucci, T., Pieretti, S. (2001). Striatal dopamine sensitization to d-amphetamine in periadolescent but not in adult rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 68, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin, I.P., Hart, S.S., & Weller, J.A. (2007). Stability of choice in a risky decision-making task: A 3-year longitudinal study with children and adults. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luciana, M., Collins, P.F., Olson, E.A., & Schissel, A.M. (2009). Tower of London performance in healthy adolescents: The development of planning skills and associations with self-reported inattention and impulsivity. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luna, B., Thulborn, K., Munoz, d., Merriam, E., Garver, K., Minshew, N., et al. (2001). Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. Neuroimage, 13, 786–793.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, C.A., Kelly, T.H., Rayens, M., Brogli, B.R., Brenzel, A., Smith, W.J., et al. (2002). Sensation seeking, puberty and nicotine, alcohol and marijuana use in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1495–1502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClure, S., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, g., & Cohen, J. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.Google Scholar
  35. Paus, T., Toro, R., Leonard, G., Lerner, J., Lerner, R., Perron, M., et al. (in press). Morphological properties of the action-observation network in adolescents with low and high resistance to peer influence. Social Neuroscience. Google Scholar
  36. Reyna, V.F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 1–44.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenberg, D., Lewis, D.A. (1995). Postnatal maturation of the dopaminergic innervation of monkey prefrontal and motor cortices: A tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemical analysis. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 358, 383–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sisk, C., & Foster, D. (2004). The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1041–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons-Morton, B., Lerner, N., & Singer, J. (2005). The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 973–982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spear, L. (2009). The behavioral neuroscience of adolescence. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Steinberg, L. (2008) A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1764–1777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors’ access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “flip-flop”. American Psychologist, 64, 583–594.Google Scholar
  46. Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Teicher, M., Andersen, S., Hostetter, J. (1995). Evidence for dopamine receptor pruning between adolescence and adulthood in striatum but not nucleus accumbens. Developmental Brain Research, 89, 167–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winkielman, P., Berridge, K.C., & Willbarger, J. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winkielman, P., Knutson, B., Paulus, M., & Trujillo, J.L. (2007). Affective influence on judgments and decisions: Moving toward core mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 11, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimring, F.E. (1998). American youth violence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations