Intellectual Property in Living Organisms. Current Situation, Trends and Challenges

  • César Morales


This chapter analyzes and studies the situation and perspectives of intellectual property protection of living organisms from the standpoint of the interests of the development countries in general and the Latin American region specially. It is a rather complex issue on which there are considerably different positions between the developed and the developing countries, companies linked to genetic engineering, universities, research centers, and development agencies.


Intellectual Property World Trade Organization European Patent Office Intellectual Property Protection Trips Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cimoli, M. (2002), “Public policy and technological innovation in Latin America: An evolutionary perspective”, presented at the seminar “Políticas de Innovación”, Brazil, Universidad Federal de Río de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  2. Coriat, B. and F. Orsi (2001), The Installation in the US of a New Regime of Intellectual Property Rights; Origins, Contents, Problems, París 13 University, June.Google Scholar
  3. Correa, C. M. (1999), Normativa nacional, regional e internacional sobre propiedad intelectual y su aplicación en los INIAS del Cono Sur, Montevideo, PROCISUR.Google Scholar
  4. Correa, C. M. (2001), Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property. A discussion Paper, available in Spanish, Los conocimientos tradicionales y la propiedad intelectual. Cuestiones y opciones acerca de la protección de los conocimientos tradicionales, Geneva, QUNO.Google Scholar
  5. ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2005), “Science and technology policies in open economies: The case of Latin America and the Caribbean”, Serie Desarrollo Productivo.Google Scholar
  6. Encyclopedia Wikipedia (s/f), “Definition of virus” [on line] ( Scholar
  7. Hunt, R. (1999), What Happened in the 1980’s, Branscomb, Kodama and Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Iañez Pareja, E. (2001), Patentes y Biotecnología, Departamento de Microbiología e Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad de Granada, publicado también por la Universidad Internacional de Andalucía, Sede La Rábida para curso “Genética humana y sus impactos en los derechos humanos” [on line] (∼eianez/Biotecnologia/biopatentes_1.htm).
  9. IICA (Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture) (2000), “Situación global de la propiedad intelectual, desafíos y oportunidades”, Investigación Agrícola y Propiedad Intelectual en la América del Sur, Brasilia, D. F.Google Scholar
  10. Katz, J. (2005), “Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, la Cooperación Regional y las Políticas Nacionales”, regional scientific conference in Cuba, UNESCO, Havana, 30 November.Google Scholar
  11. Lichtenberg, E. (2000), “Costs of regulating genetically modified pest-protected plants”, National Research Council, Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  12. Mooney, P. (2000), “The ETC Century”, Development Dialogue 1999, 1-2, y RAFI 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883).Google Scholar
  14. Platt, L. (2001), “Securitization of biotechnology research patents”, Convergence: The Biotechnology Industry Report, Millennium Edition, Ernst & Young.Google Scholar
  15. Solleiro, J. L., C. Del Valle and E. Moreno (coord.) (1996), Posibilidades para el desarrollo tecnológico del campo mexicano, Editorial Cambio XXI, México, UNAM.Google Scholar
  16. TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (2006) [on line] (
  17. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development)–ICTSD (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development) (2005), Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Cambridge University Press, United States.Google Scholar
  18. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2000), Informe de Desarrollo Humano y Globalización.Google Scholar
  19. UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Plant Varieties) [on line] (
  20. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) (2006), “Arreglo de Madrid” [on line] (
  21. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) (2006), “Tratado de Cooperación sobre Patentes” [on line] (

Copyright information

© United Nations 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Commission for Latin America and the CaribbeanSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations