Abstract
The architecture of intellectual property rights has become increasingly complex, especially since the entry into force of the 1995 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) reached during the Uruguay Round of GATT which ended in the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Original work based on the paper presented on 30 November 2004 at the First High Level Regional Course on Issues and Techniques of Negotiations in the field of Intellectual Property in Latin America and the Caribbean, organised by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The present version was presented at the “Seminar for the creation of capabilities in the field of intellectual property rights,” organised by the Subregional Headquarters of ECLAC in Mexico, in November 2005.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Abbott, F. (2004), “The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the contradictory Trend in Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreements” (http://www.quno.org), April.
Berger, J. (2004), “Advancing health by other means: using competition policy to increase access to essential medicines”, ICTSD-UNCTAD, 12 to 16 October.
Bermúdez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda and Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira (eds.) (2004), Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: Challenges for public health Río de Janeiro, Fiocruz, ENSP, September (Chapter 1: Bermúdez, Oliveira & Costa Chaves, “Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: What is at Stake?”; Chapter 2: Velásquez, “Bilateral trade agreements and access to essential drugs”; Chapter 4: Velásquez, Correa & Balasubramaniam, “WHO in the Frontiers of the Access to Medicine Battle…”).
Bermúdez, Jorge, Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira and Ángela Esher (2004), “Acceso a Medicamentos: Derecho Fundamental, Papel del Estado”, Río de Janeiro, Fiocruz, ENSP.
Cabanellas, G. (2001), Derecho de Patentes (ed.), Buenos Aires, Heliasta.
Correa, C. (2004), “Mal negocio de Chile con Estados Unidos. Protección de la propiedad intelectual y salud pública en el TLC”, Le Monde Diplomatique, N° 57, March.
González Perini, F., V. Lowenstein and P. Wegbrait (2004), “El principio del agotamiento del Derecho de Patentes”, Buenos Aires, Revista La Ley, 24 March.
Kraus, D. (2004), “Les importations paralleles de produits brevetés”, Schulthess-Bruylant.
Laurie, G. (2004), “Patenting Stem Cells of Human Origin”, E.I.P.R 2, pp. 59-66.
Le Tourneau, P. (2003), Contrats informatiques et électroniques, Paris, Dalloz.
Lind-Edlund (2003), Patent World.
Magelli, S. (2003), “Innovazione informatica e diritti di brevetto”, in Le Nuove Frontiere del Diritto dei Brevetti, Torino, G. Giappichelli Editore.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2004), Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges.
Pugatch, M. P. (2004), “Intellectual property and pharmaceutical data exclusivity in the context of innovation and market access”: ICTSD-UNCTAD, 12 to 16 October.
Sandri, S. (1999), “La nuova disciplina della proprietá industriale doppo I GATT-TRIPs”, Padova, CEDAM.
South Centre and CIEL IP Quarterly Update, Third Quarter 2004, “Intellectual Property and Developments in Multilateral, Plurilateral and Bilateral Fora”.
Velásquez, G., C. Correa and T. Balasubramaniam (2004), “WHO in the frontlines of the access to medicines battle: The debate on Intellectual Property Rights and Public Health”, in J. Bermúdez and M. A. Oliveira (eds.), Intellectual Property in the context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: Challenges for Public Health, Brazil, WHO/PAHO, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ, .
World Trade Organization, IP/C/W/369; IP/C/W/368 8 August 2002 sobre la revisión del art. 27.3 (b) del ADPIC y su relación con UPOV y la CDB.
WTO (World Trade Organization) (2002), “Solución mutuamente acordada entre Estados Unidos y Argentina en el ámbito de la OMC” (http://www.wto.org), IP/D/18/Add.1; IP/D/22/Add.1; WT/DS171/3; WT/DS196/4, 20 June.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 United Nations
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moncayo von Hase, A. (2009). The Flexibility of TRIPS and Its Possible Erosion in Bilateral, Multilateral, and Regional Negotiations. In: Martínez-Piva, J. (eds) Knowledge Generation and Protection. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1264-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1264-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1263-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1264-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)