Advertisement

The Flexibility of TRIPS and Its Possible Erosion in Bilateral, Multilateral, and Regional Negotiations

  • Andrés Moncayo von Hase
Chapter

Abstract

The architecture of intellectual property rights has become increasingly complex, especially since the entry into force of the 1995 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) reached during the Uruguay Round of GATT which ended in the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Keywords

Intellectual Property World Trade Organization Free Trade Agreement European Patent Office Compulsory License 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Abbott, F. (2004), “The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the contradictory Trend in Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreements” (http://www.quno.org), April.
  2. Berger, J. (2004), “Advancing health by other means: using competition policy to increase access to essential medicines”, ICTSD-UNCTAD, 12 to 16 October.Google Scholar
  3. Bermúdez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda and Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira (eds.) (2004), Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: Challenges for public health Río de Janeiro, Fiocruz, ENSP, September ( Chapter 1: Bermúdez, Oliveira & Costa Chaves, “Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: What is at Stake?”;  Chapter 2: Velásquez, “Bilateral trade agreements and access to essential drugs”;  Chapter 4: Velásquez, Correa & Balasubramaniam, “WHO in the Frontiers of the Access to Medicine Battle…”).
  4. Bermúdez, Jorge, Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira and Ángela Esher (2004), “Acceso a Medicamentos: Derecho Fundamental, Papel del Estado”, Río de Janeiro, Fiocruz, ENSP.Google Scholar
  5. Cabanellas, G. (2001), Derecho de Patentes (ed.), Buenos Aires, Heliasta.Google Scholar
  6. Correa, C. (2004), “Mal negocio de Chile con Estados Unidos. Protección de la propiedad intelectual y salud pública en el TLC”, Le Monde Diplomatique, N° 57, March.Google Scholar
  7. González Perini, F., V. Lowenstein and P. Wegbrait (2004), “El principio del agotamiento del Derecho de Patentes”, Buenos Aires, Revista La Ley, 24 March.Google Scholar
  8. Kraus, D. (2004), “Les importations paralleles de produits brevetés”, Schulthess-Bruylant.Google Scholar
  9. Laurie, G. (2004), “Patenting Stem Cells of Human Origin”, E.I.P.R 2, pp. 59-66.Google Scholar
  10. Le Tourneau, P. (2003), Contrats informatiques et électroniques, Paris, Dalloz.Google Scholar
  11. Lind-Edlund (2003), Patent World.Google Scholar
  12. Magelli, S. (2003), “Innovazione informatica e diritti di brevetto”, in Le Nuove Frontiere del Diritto dei Brevetti, Torino, G. Giappichelli Editore.Google Scholar
  13. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2004), Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges.Google Scholar
  14. Pugatch, M. P. (2004), “Intellectual property and pharmaceutical data exclusivity in the context of innovation and market access”: ICTSD-UNCTAD, 12 to 16 October.Google Scholar
  15. Sandri, S. (1999), “La nuova disciplina della proprietá industriale doppo I GATT-TRIPs”, Padova, CEDAM.Google Scholar
  16. South Centre and CIEL IP Quarterly Update, Third Quarter 2004, “Intellectual Property and Developments in Multilateral, Plurilateral and Bilateral Fora”.Google Scholar
  17. Velásquez, G., C. Correa and T. Balasubramaniam (2004), “WHO in the frontlines of the access to medicines battle: The debate on Intellectual Property Rights and Public Health”, in J. Bermúdez and M. A. Oliveira (eds.), Intellectual Property in the context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: Challenges for Public Health, Brazil, WHO/PAHO, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ, .Google Scholar
  18. World Trade Organization, IP/C/W/369; IP/C/W/368 8 August 2002 sobre la revisión del art. 27.3 (b) del ADPIC y su relación con UPOV y la CDB.Google Scholar
  19. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2002), “Solución mutuamente acordada entre Estados Unidos y Argentina en el ámbito de la OMC” (http://www.wto.org), IP/D/18/Add.1; IP/D/22/Add.1; WT/DS171/3; WT/DS196/4, 20 June.

Copyright information

© United Nations 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations