Skip to main content

Recent Changes in Science and Technology Policy in Mexico: Innovation Incentives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Generation and Protection

Abstract

In the current context of trade liberalization we can see the development and co-existence of novel processes and dynamics which suggest new ways of designing and implementing policies to foster firm production and innovation. For instance, trademark exploitation (franchises) and production methods for durable goods for personal and domestic use (apparel, footwear, domestic appliances, and even cars) reinforce the tendency toward worldwide standardization. Moreover, there is a trend toward economic specialization in regions and countries. Production processes have gradually been segmented into links in worldwide production chains in regions, which has promoted specialization in firms manufacturing parts and components and product assembly. The subsidiaries of multinational corporations and national companies participate in this trend in different ways, irrespective of size.

Villavicencio is Professor-Researcher of the Master’s Degree in Economics and Management of Technological Change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alba, C. (1997), “Las empresas integradoras en México”, Comercio Exterior, 47(1), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amitav, R. (1990), “Science, technology and policy in the periphery: a perspective from the centre”, World Development, 1(1), 1429–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. and S. Iammarino (2003), “The globalization of technology and national policies”, in D. Archibugi and B. Lundvall (eds.), The Globalizing Learning Economy, Oxford University Press N.Y. United States, pp. 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, R. (1996), La relación incierta, ciencia aplicada y desarrollo en Venezuela, Caracas, Fondo Editorial Fintec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M. (1992), “The incentives to decentralized industrial creativity in local systems of small firms”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle 59, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalet, M. (2005), New Institutional dynamics for the creation of a favorable environment for competitiveness: Hope or reality?”, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, Innovation and Economic Development, Special Issue, Sydney, Australia, eContent Management Pty. Ltd., pp. 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalet, M. (2000), “The institutional matrix and its main functional activities supporting innovation”, in M. Cimoli (ed.), Developing Innovation Systems, Mexico in a Global Context, Continuum, London and New York, pp. 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalet, M. et al. (1995), Red de apoyos públicos y privados hacia la competitividad de las PYMES, Mexico, NAFIN/FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M. (2005), “Redes, estructuras de mercado y shocks económicos. Cambios estructurales de los sistemas de innovación en América Latina”, en Casalet M., M., Cimoli and G. Yoguel, eds., Redes, Jerarquías y Dinámicas Productivas, FLACSO/OIT/Miño y Dávila, Buenos Aires, CONCYTEG, pp. 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M. (2001), Developing Innovation Systems: Mexico in a Global Context, Continuum Printer Publishers, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONACYT (National Science and Technology Council) (2006) [on line] (http://www.conacyt.mx) [date of consultation: August 2005].

  • CONACYT (National Science and Technology Council) (2001), Programa Especial de Ciencia y Tecnología (PECYT), Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diario Oficial de la Federación (Official Gazette of the Federation) (2002), several numbers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. et al. (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter Pubilsher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Ch. (2002), “Innovation policy, a systemic approach”, in D. Archibugi and B. Lundvall (eds.), The Globalizing Learning Economy, Oxford University Press, N.Y. United States, pp. 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G. (1998), “Competence blocs and industrial policy in the knowledge-based economy”, Science Technology Industry 22, 209–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. and C. Pérez (1988), “Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behaviour”, in Dosi G. et al. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter Publisher, pp. 38–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halty-Carrère, M. (1986), Estrategias de desarrollo tecnológico para países en desarrollo, Mexico, Colmex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000), Reformas estructurales, productividad y conducta tecnológica en América Latina, Fondo de Cultura Económica and ECLAC, Santiago de Chile, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, Ph. and Ph. Mustar (2001), Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, Massachusetts, E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. (1998), “Technology policies in neo-classical and structuralist-evolutionary models”, Science Technology Industry 22, 31–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, M. (1995), “La acción organizada del sector privado. Los empresarios pequeños”, in T. Calvo and B. Martínez (eds.), Micro y pequeña empresa en México, Mexico, Misceláneas, pp. 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2003), Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. and L. Georghiou (1998), “Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy”, Science, Technology and Industry, vol. 22, OECD, Paris, pp. 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • México, Ley de Ciencia y Tecnología (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mújica, A. (1997), “Las cámaras empresariales como sustento de la política industrial activa”, in E. Dussel, M. Piore and C. Ruiz (eds.), Pensar globalmente y actuar regionalmente, Mexico, UNAM-FES-JUS, pp. 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J. and B. Bellon (1995), “Une interprétation évolutionniste des politiques industrielles”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, vol. 71, CNRS, Paris, pp. 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm, J. et al. (2002), “Innovation policy in the knowledge-based economy, Can theory guide policy making?, in D. Archibugi and B. Lundvall (eds.), The Globalizing Learning Economy, Oxford University Press, N.Y. United States, pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1994), “Réseaux technico-économiques et politique scientifique et technologique”, Science Technologie Industrie (STI) 14, 67–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1996), Technology and Industrial Performance, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, C. (1996), “La modernización industrial en América Latina y la herencia de la sustitución de importaciones”, Comercio Exterior 46, Nº 5, Mexico, 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussell, P. A., K. N. Saad and T. J. Erickson (1991), Tercera generación de I & D. Su integración en la estrategia de negocios, Spain, McGraw-Hill, Chapter 1 to 3, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, D. (1990), Industria, estado y política en México, los empresarios y el poder, Mexico, CONACULTA-Grijalbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, C. (1994), Los empresarios ante la globalización, México, UNAM-Cámara de Diputados.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. (1993), “Los paradigmas de la política tecnológica”, en Micheli J., Tecnología y Modernización Económica, Mexico, UAM/CONACYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. (2000), “Las políticas industriales en transición”, in J. Carrillo (ed.), Aglomeraciones locales o clusters globales?, Evolución empresarial e institucional en el norte de México, Mexico, Fundación Ebert y Colef, pp. 45–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. (2001), “A política tecnológica do México na década de 1990: novas idéais, velhos hábitos”, in N. Araujo and S. Martin (eds.), Competitividade e Desenvolvimento, Atores e Institucoes Locais, Senac, San Paulo, pp. 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. (2006), “Evaluación del Programa de Fomento a la Investigación Científica del CONACYT”, Informe Final para el ejercicio fiscal 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. and R. Arvanitis (1994), “Transferencia de tecnología y aprendizaje tecnológico: Reflexiones basadas en trabajos empíricos”, El Trimestre Económico, vol. LXI/242, Mexico, FCE, pp. 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio, D. and M. Casalet (2005), “La construcción de un “entorno” institucional de apoyo a la industria maquiladora en la frontera norte de México”, Revista Gallega de ECONOMÍA, vol. 14(1–2), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Imprenta Universitaria, Spain, June, pp. 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Villavicencio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 United Nations

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Villavicencio, D. (2009). Recent Changes in Science and Technology Policy in Mexico: Innovation Incentives. In: Martínez-Piva, J. (eds) Knowledge Generation and Protection. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1264-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics