Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS))

  • 509 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For such an attempt see for example, Kendall, J. (2003). Mainstreaming the Voluntary Sector on to the UK Policy Agenda. The Voluntary Sector: Comparative Perspectives in the UK. London: Routledge, 44–65.

References

  • Anderson, J. (1979). Public Policy Making. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. & Kendall, J. (2001). Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads: An International Nonprofit Analysis. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. (2001). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making. Armonk: M.E. Sharp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. D. & DeLeon, P. (1983). The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood: Dorsey Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, P. (1999). The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What has it Done? Where is it going? In: P. A. Sabatier (Ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dery, D. (2000). Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies Journal 21(1), 37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (1998). Understanding Public Policy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1971). The Political System. New York: Knopf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain. In: F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press, 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. W. & Gunn, L. A. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. & Ramesh, R. (1995). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jann, W. & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the Policy Cycle. In: F. Fishcer, G. J. Miller & M. S. Sidney (Eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. New York: Taylor & Francis, 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (1998). Analyzing Public Policy. London: Pinter

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (2003). Is There Life after Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal 31(4), 481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (2006). The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence. Cheltenhaum, UK: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J. & Anheier, H. (2001). The Third Sector and the European Union policy process: An Initial Evaluation. In: H. Anheier & J. Kendall (Eds.) Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads: An International Nonprofit Analysis. London: Routledge, 126–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J. (2003). Mainstreaming the Voluntary Sector on to the UK Policy Agenda. The Voluntary Sector: Comparative Perspectives in the UK. London: Routledge, 44–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy, 2nd edition. Boston: Little, Brown

    Google Scholar 

  • Laswell, H. (1951). The Policy Orientation. In: D. Lerner & H. Laswell (Eds.) The Policy Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2005). New Labour’s Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership. Social Policy and Society 4(2), 121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbloom, C. E. & Woodhouse, J. E. (1993). The Policy Making Process, 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. & Passey, A. (2006). Need Public Policy Ignore the Third Sector? Government Policy in Australia and the United Kingdom. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65(3), 90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, J. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuation in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakaruma, R. (1987). The Textbook Policy Process and Implementation Research. Policy Studies Review 7(2), 142–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. W. (1984). Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (1988). Policy Making in a Democracy. In: R. B. Reich (Ed.) The Power of Public Ideas. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 123–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A. & Cobb, R. W. (1994). Problem Definition: An Emerging Perspective. In: D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.) The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. & Jenkins-Smith, P. (1993). The Study of Public Policy Processes. In: P. A. Sabateir & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Boulder: Westview Press, 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy Change over a Decade or More. In: P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Boulder: Westview Press, 13–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In: P. A. Sabatier (Ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 117–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (1997). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C. M. & Sabatier, P. A. (2007). A Guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework. In: F. Fishcer, G. J. Miller & M. S. Sidney (Eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. New York: Taylor & Francis, 123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. (1987). The Powers of Problem Definition: The Case of Government Paperwork. Policy Sciences 22(2), 97–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (1992). To Sell or Not to Sell? Telecommunications Policy in Britain and France. Journal of Public Policy 12(4), 355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (1996). Selling British Rail: An idea Whose Time Has Come? Comparative Political Studies 29(4), 400–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, Time and Multiple Streams. In: P. A. Sabatier (Ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 73–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Gidron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gidron, B., Bar, M. (2010). Introduction. In: Gidron, B., Bar, M. (eds) Policy Initiatives Towards the Third Sector in International Perspective. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1259-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics