Skip to main content

Indications and General Oncologic Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Minimally Invasive Cancer Management
  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

Before 1987, the laparoscope was considered an instrument that allowed only intraabdominal inspection and biopsy of lesions. With the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the mid-1980s, the endoscopic technique has become an important method of performing minimal access surgical resection and lymph node staging, with application of other intraabdominal therapy such as thermal ablation of liver metastases. Laparoscopic staging has been applied to upper and lower gastrointestinal malignancies as well as tumors involving the pancreatobiliary tract. Although important in preoperative staging of abdominal cancer, the laparoscope has an even more important potential use in the identification of patients who will not benefit from open celiotomy for extirpation of tumor or bypass. Preoperative laparoscopic staging for esophageal and gastric cancer may identify patients with lymph node metastases whose disease would be understaged using traditional imaging techniques of computed tomography and percutaneous ultrasound.

The cleaner and gentler the act of operation, the less pain the patient suffers, the smoother and quicker the convalescence, the more exquisite his healed wound, the happier his memory of the whole incident. (Moynihan [ 1 ])

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moynihan B (1920) The ritual of a surgical operation. Br J Surg 8:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Are C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M et al (2008) Current role of therapeutic laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in the management of malignancy: a review of trends from a tertiary care cancer center. J Am Coll Surg 206:709–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH et al (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26:3496–3502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (eds) (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. AJCC (2009) Cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  6. John TG, Greig JD, Crosbie JL, Miles WF, Garden OJ (1994) Superior staging of liver tumors with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound. Ann Surg 220:711–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS, Coit DG, Turnbull AD, Brennan MF (1996) The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg 223:134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krasna MJ, Flowers JL, Attar S, McLaughlin J (1996) Combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic staging of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:800–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke EC, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, Brennan MF (1997) Laparoscopy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 225:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Warshaw A (1991) Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 161:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ribeiro U Jr, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, Safatle-Ribeiro AV et al (1998) Prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells obtained by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Comprehensive Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed August 21, 2008

  13. Busch OR, Hop WC, Hoynck van Papendrecht MA, Marquet RL, Jeekel J (1993) Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 328:1372–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL et al (1996) Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S20–S23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beebe DS, McNevin MP, Crain JM et al (1993) Evidence of venous stasis after abdominal insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:443–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Caprini JA, Arcelus JI, Laubach M et al (1995) Postoperative hypercoagulability and deep-vein thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9:304–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17:972–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Watson RW, Redmond HP, McCarthy J, Burke PE, Hayes DB (1995) Exposure of the peritoneal cavity to air regulates early inflammatory responses to surgery in a murine model. Br J Surg 82:1060–1065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heys SD, Deehan DJ, Eremin O (1994) Interleukin-2 treatment in colorectal cancer: current results and future prospects. Eur J Surg Oncol 20:622–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mels AK, Statius Muller MG, van Leeuwen PA et al (2001) Immune-stimulating effects of low-dose perioperative recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients operated on for primary colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88:539–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirman I, Belizon A, Balik E et al (2007) Perioperative sargramostim (recombinant human GM-CSF) induces an increase in the level of soluble VEGFR1 in colon cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:1169–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Werther K, Christensen IJ, Brunner N, Nielsen HJ (2000) Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with primary colorectal carcinoma. The Danish RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Eur J Surg Oncol 26: 657–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karayiannakis AJ, Syrigos KN, Zbar A (2002) Clinical significance of preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with colorectal cancer and the effect of tumor surgery. Surgery 131:548–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Belizon A, Balik E, Feingold DL et al (2006) Major abdominal surgery increases plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor: open more so than minimally invasive methods. Ann Surg 244:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Belizon A, Horst P, Balik E et al (2008) Persistent elevation of plasma VEGF levels during the first month following minimally invasive colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22:287–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI (2004) Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changes: a review. Surg Endosc 18: 1316–1322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Pancreatic cancer guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2008

  28. Ferrone CR, Haas B, Tang L et al (2006) The influence of positive peritoneal cytology on survival on patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1347–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Gastric cancer guidelines. Clinical cancer guidelines in oncology http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2008

  30. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal cancer guideline. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2008

  31. Kaushik N, Khalid A, Brody D, Luketich J, McGrath K (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound compared with laparoscopy for staging esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83: 2000–2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gourgiotis S, Kocher HM, Solaini L, Yarollahi A, Tsiambas E, Salemis NS (2008) Gallbladder cancer. Am J Surg 196:252–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Guidelines for hepatobiliary cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2008

  34. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein DH (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Phillips EH, Franklin ME, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramas R, Rosenthal D (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216:703–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Norem RF (1995) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc 9:811–816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer; short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Böhm B, Milsom JW, Kitago K, Brand M, Stolfi VM, Fazio VW (1995) Use of laparoscopic techniques in oncologic right colectomy in a canine model. Ann Surg Oncol 2:6–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D et al (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S35–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cuschieri A (1994) Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:178–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greene, F.L. (2009). Indications and General Oncologic Principles. In: Greene, F., Heniford, B. (eds) Minimally Invasive Cancer Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1238-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1238-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1237-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1238-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics