Adaptation and Recommendation Techniques to Improve the Quality of Annotations and the Relevance of Resources in Web 2.0 and Semantic Web-Based Applications

  • Ilaria Torre
Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 6)


The Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web represent different forms of evolution of the first-generation Web, and both of them enrich Web resources with semantic annotations. Recommendation and personalization of Web resources is another trend that becomes more and more important with the growth of information, and both the Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web are deeply connected to it. The objective of this paper is to analyze the contribution of recommendation and adaptation techniques to these paradigms and to investigate if these techniques can be used as a bridge for their integration. More specifically, the paper will focus on the contribution of adaptation and recommendation techniques to improve the quality of annotations in the Web 2.0, Semantic Web, and mixed approaches and the relevance of annotated resources that are retrieved or filtered to users.


Domain Ontology Adaptation Technique Mixed Approach Recommendation Technique Movie Recommender 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This review has been supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), PRIN-05.


  1. 1.
    Abbott R (2004) Subjectivity as a Concern for Information Science: a Popperian Perspective, Journal of Information Science 30(1):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antoniou G, van Harmelen F (2004) A Semantic Web Primer. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apted T, Kay J, Lum A (2004) Supporting Metadata Creation with an Ontology Built from an Extensible Dictionary. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aroyo L, De Bra P, Houben GJ (2004) Embedding Information Retrieval in Adaptive Hypermedia: IR meets AHA!, in Hypermedia 10(1):53–76, Taylor Graham PublishingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aroyo L, Stash N, Wang Y, Gorgels P, Rutledge L (2007) CHIP Demonstrator: Semantics-Driven Recommendations and Museum Tour Generation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International SW Conference – ISWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11–15, 879–886Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basile P, Gendarmi D, Lanubile F, Semeraro G (2007) Recommending Smart Tags in a Social Bookmarking System. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Bridging the Gap Between SW and Web 2.0, at 4th European SW Conference ESWC’07, 22–29Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bateman S (2007) Collaborative Tagging: Folksonomy, Metadata, Visualization, E-Learning, Master of Science Thesis, supervised by Gordon McCalla, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, SaskatoonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bateman S, Brooks C, McCalla G (2006) Collaborative Tagging Approaches for Ontological Metadata in Adaptive E-Learning Systems. In: Workshop on Applications of SW Technologies for E-Learning (AH 06), 3–12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berners-Lee T (1998) Semantic Web Road Map,, Accessed 20 June 2008
  10. 10.
    Berners-Lee T (2002) The Future of the Web, in Scientific American, Special Online Issue, April 2002, 2:24–30Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web, Scientific AmericanGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berners-Lee T, Hall W, Hendler JA, O’Hara K, Shadbolt N, Weitzner DJ (2006) A Framework for Web Science. Foundations and Trends (R) in Web Science. Now Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beys P, Benjamins VR, van Heijst G (1996) Remedying the reusability–usability tradeoff for problem-solving methods. In: Gaines BR, Musen MA, eds. Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 2.1–2.20, Alberta, Canada. SRDG PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brin S, Page L (1998) The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7):107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brusilovsky P (1996) Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactaction 6(2–3):87–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brusilovsky P, Sosnovsky S, Yudelson M (2004) Adaptive Hypermedia Services for E-Learning. In: AH 2004 Workshops proceedings, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 470–479Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W, eds. (2007) The Adaptive Web. Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, No 4321 LNCS, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carmagnola F, Cena F, Console L, Cortassa O, Gena C, Goy A, Torre I, Toso A, Vernero F (2008) Tag-Based User Modeling for Social Multi-Device Adaptive Guides. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. DOI:10.1007/s11257-008-9052-2Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chirita P, Costache S, Nejdl W, Handschuh S (2007) P-TAG: Large Scale Automatic Generation of Personalized Annotation Tags for the Web. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 8–12, 2007). WWW ’07. ACM, New York, 845–854Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Conlan O, Wade V (2004) Evaluation of APeLS – An Adaptive eLearning Service Based on the Multi-Model, Metadata-Driven Approach. In: Proceedings of AH2004, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cristea A, de Mooij A (2003) LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and Their Corresponding Algebraic Operators. In: Proc. of 12th WWW Conference, Budapest, Hungary,, Accessed 10 June 2008
  22. 22.
    De Bra P, Houben G-J, Wu H (1999) AHAM: A Dexter-Based Reference Model for Adap-tive Hypermedia, In: Proc. International Conference on Hypertext ’99, 147–156Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dolog P, Henze N, Nejdl W, Sintek M (2004) The Personal Reader: Personalizing and Enriching Learning Resources Using SW Technologies. In: Proc. AH 2004, LNCS, Springer, 85–94Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frasincar F, Houben G-J (2002) Hypermedia Presentation Adaptation on the SW, In: Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, De Bra P, Brusilovsky P, Conejo R, eds. Second International Conference, AH2002, Malaga, Spain, Springer LNCS 2347:133–142Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garlatti G, Iksal S (2004) A Flexible Composition Engine for Adaptive Web Site. In: Proc. AH2004, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gendarmi D, Abbattista F, Lanubile F (2007) Fostering Knowledge Evolution Through Community-Based Participation. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social and Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge at WWW’07Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gershenfeld N, Krikorian R, Cohen D (2004) The Internet of Things. Scientific American 291:44, 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Golder S, Huberman BA (2006) Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2):198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gomez-Perez A, Fernandez-Lopez M, Corcho O (2003) Ontological Engineering. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gruber T (2007) Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-Up of Apples and Oranges, in International Journal on SW and Information Systems, 3(1):1–11Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guy M, Tonkin E (2006) Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags? D-Lib Magazine, 12(1),, Accessed 13 June 2008
  32. 32.
    Haase P, Hotho A, Schmidt-Thieme L, Sure Y (2005) Collaborative and Usage-Driven Evolution of Personal Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the European SW Conference ESWC 2005, 486–499Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jaschke R, Marinho L, Hotho A, Schmidt-Thieme L, Stumme G (2007) Tag Recommendations in Folksonomies, in LNCS Knowledge Discovery in DataBases, vol 4702/2007:506–514, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koch N, Wirsing M (2002) The Munich Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia Applications, In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. London, UK, 213–222Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kotis K, Vouros GA, Alonso JP (2004) HCOME: Tool-Supported Methodology for Collabo-Ratively Devising Living Ontologies. In: SWDB’04: 2. Int. Workshop on Semantic Web and DatabasesGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kravcík M, Gaševic D (2007) Leveraging the SW for Adaptive Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Adaptation and IMS Learning Design, Special Issue, Daniel Burgos, ed), 2007/06., Accessed 23 June 2008
  37. 37.
    Macgregor G, McCulloch E (2006) Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool, Library Review 55:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marlow C, Naaman M, Davis M, Boyd D (2006) Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, ToRead. In: Press A, ed. In: Proceedings of Hypertext and Hypermedia, 31–40Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mathes A (2004) Folksonomies – Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, USA. /folksonomies.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2008
  40. 40.
    Mika P (2005) Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. Proceedings of the 4th International SW Conference, LNCS, Vol. 3729 Springer, 522–536Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mishne G (2006) AutoTag: A Collaborative Approach to Automated Tag Assignment for Weblog Posts. In: Proceedings of the 15th international Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23–26, ACM, New York, 953–954Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nauerz A, Pietschmann S, Pietzsch R (2007) Collaborative Annotation-Driven Adaptation in Web Portals, In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Manchester, UK, September 10–12, 2007, ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nauerz A, Junginger M, Zhao S (2008) A Recommender Based on Automatic Metadata Extraction and User-Driven Collaborative Annotation, In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Recommendation and Collaboration, at IUI ’08, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan 13–16Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    O’Reilly T (2005) What Is Web 2.0, Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Accessed 4 June 2008
  45. 45.
    Pazzani M, Billsus D (2007) Content-Based Recommendation Systems, In: The Adaptive Web, LNCS 4321:325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The Top Five Reasons for Lurking: Improving Community Experiences for Everyone. Computers in Human Behavior 20(2):201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Quintarelli E (2005) Folksonomies: Power to the People, Proceedings of the 1st International Society for Knowledge Organization, Italy (ISKOI), UniMIB Meeting, June 24, Milan, Accessed 22 June 2008
  48. 48.
    Razmerita L, Angehrn A, Maedche A (2003) Ontology-Based User Modeling for Knowledge Management Systems. In: LNCS 2702, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval. In: Information Processing and Management, 24(5):513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sauermann L, Bernardi A, Dengel A (2005) Overview and Outlook on the Semantic Desktop. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on the Semantic Desktop at ISWCGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sauermann L, Dengel A, van Elst L, Lauer A, Maus H, Schwarz S (2006) Personalization in the EPOS Project. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on SW Personalization, Budva, Montenegro, June 12, 42–52Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schafer JB, Frankowski D, Herlocker J, Sen S (2007) Collaborative Filtering Recommendater Systems, in The Adaptive Web, LNCS 4321:291–324Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shadbolt N, Berners-Lee T, Hall W (2006) The Semantic Web Revisited, IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3):96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shepitsen A, Gemmell J, Mobasher B, Burke R (2008) Personalized Recommendation in Collaborative Tagging Systems Using Hierarchical Clustering, In: International Conference on Recommender Systems 08, Losanna, October 23–25Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shirky C (2005) Ontology Is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags, http://www.shirky/com/writings/ontology{\_}overrated.html. Accessed 10 May 2008
  56. 56.
    Sinha R (2005) A Cognitive Analysis of Tagging, Accessed 28 June 2008
  57. 57.
    Soroka V, Jacovi M (2004) The Diffusion of Reachout: Analysis and Framework for the Successful Diffusion of Collaboration Technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY, USA, 314–323Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Soroka V, Rafaeli S (2006) Invisible Participants: How Cultural Capital Relates to Lurking Behavior. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA, 163–172Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Specia L, Motta E (2007) Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web, The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 4th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 07, LNCS 4519:624–639Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Staab S, Schnurr HP, Studer R, Sure Y (2001) Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stock O, Zancanaro M (2007) PEACH – Intelligent Interfaces for Museum Visits (Cognitive Technologies), Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Szomszor M, Cattuto C, Alani H, O’Hara, Baldassarri K, Loreto V, Servedio V (2007) Folksonomies, the Semantic Web, and Movie Recommendation. In: Proceedings of 4th European Semantic Web Conference Innsbruck, Austria, 71–85Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tempich C, Pinto HS, Staab S (2006) Ontology Engineering Revisited: An Iterative Case Study. In: Proceedings of ESWC 06, 110–124Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Torre I (2009) Adaptive systems in the era of the semantic and social web, a survey, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, DOI 10.1007/s11257-009-9067-3Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Van der Sluijs K, Houben G (2008) Relating User Tags to Ontological Information. In: Proceedings of UbiqUM 2008: Theories and Applications of Ubiquitous User Modeling Workshop at IUI ’08, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan 13–16Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vander Wal T (2004) Folksonomy Coinage and Definition, Accessed 28 May 2008
  67. 67.
    Vdovjak R, Frasincar F, Houben G, Barna P (2003) Engineering Semantic Web Information Systems in Hera, Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1/2:3–26Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xu Z, Fu Y, Mao J, Su D (2006) Towards the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Collaborative Web Tagging, WWW 06, May 22–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations