Abstract
As a prelude to several chapters describing the construction of a matched control group, the current chapter presents an example of a matched observational study as it might (and did) appear in a scientific journal. When reporting a matched observational study, the matching methods are described very briefly in the Methods section. In more detail, the Results section presents tables or figures showing that the matching has been effective in balancing certain observed covariates, so that treated and control groups are comparable with respect to these specific variables. The Results section then compares outcomes in treated and control groups. Because matching has arranged matters to compare ostensibly comparable groups, the comparison of outcomes is often both simpler in form and more detailed in content than it might be if separate adjustments were required for each aspect of each outcome. Treated and control groups that appear comparable in terms of a specific list of measured covariates – groups that are ostensibly comparable – may nonetheless differ in terms of covariates that were not measured. Though not discussed in the current chapter, the important issue of unmeasured covariates in this example is discussed in Part III.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cleveland, W.S.: The Elements of Graphing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
Mayer, A.R., Chambers, S.K., Graves, E., et al: Ovarian cancer staging: Does it require a gynecologic oncologist? Gynecol Oncol 47, 223–337 (1992)
McGuire, W.P., Bundy, B., Wenzel, L., et al.: Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 334, 1–6 (1996)
Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. : The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41–55 (1983)
Rosenbaum, P.R.: Optimal matching in observational studies. J Am Statist Assoc 84, 1024–1032 (1989)
Rosenbaum, P.R., Ross R.N., Silber, J.H.: Minimum distance matched sampling with fine balance in an observational study of treatment for ovarian cancer. J Am Statist Assoc 102, 75–83. (2007)
O’Brien, P.C., Fleming, T.R.: A paired Prentice-Wilcoxon test for censored paired data. Biometrics 43, 169–180 (1987)
Silber, J.H., Rosenbaum, P.R., Polsky, D., Ross, R.N., Even-Shoshan, O., Schwartz, S., Armstrong, K.A., Randall, T.C. : Does ovarian cancer treatment and survival differ by the specialty providing chemotherapy? J Clin Oncol 25, 1169–1175 (2007); related editorial 25, 1157–1159 (2007); related letters and rejoinders 5, 3552–3558 (2007)
Vandenbroucke, J.P. : When are observational studies as credible as randomized trials? Lancet 363, 1728–1731 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenbaum, P.R. (2010). A Matched Observational Study. In: Design of Observational Studies. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1212-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1213-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)