Competing Theories Structure Design

Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS)


In a well designed experiment or observational study, competing theories make conflicting predictions. Several examples, some quite old, are used to illustrate. Also discussed are: the goals of replication, empirical studies of reasons for effects, and the importance of systemic knowledge in eliminating errors.


Minimum Wage Thought Experiment Liquidity Constraint Credit Limit Buyback Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achinstein, P. : Are empirical evidence claims a priori? Brit J Philos Sci 46, 447–473 (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainslie, G. : Breakdown of Will. New York: Cambridge University Press (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Almond, D. : Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long-term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post-1940 US population. J Polit Econ 4, 672–712 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athens, L. : Violent Criminal Acts and Actors Revisited. Urbana: University of Illinois Press (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. R. : The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. New York: Routledge (1991)Google Scholar
  6. Cahuc, P., Zylberberg, A. : Labor Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  7. Card, D. : The causal effect of education. In: Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, eds. New York: North-Holland (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Card, D., Krueger, A. : Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev 84, 772–793 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. Card, D., Krueger, A. : A reanalysis of the effect of the New Jersey minimum wage increase on the fast-food industry with representative payroll data. NBER Working Paper 6386. Boston: National Bureau of Economic Research (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Card, D., Krueger, A. : Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply. Am Econ Rev 90, 1397–1420 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Chamberlin, T.C. : The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 15, 92 (1890), reprinted Science 148, 754–759 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Clark, C.R. : Advertising restrictions and competition in the children’s breakfast cereal industry. J Law Econ 50, 757–780 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clinton, S.K., Giovannucci, E. : Diet, nutrition, and prostate cancer. Annu Rev Nutr 18, 413–440 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley, N., Andrieu, S., Gardette. V., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Sanz, C., Vellas, B., Grand, A.: Dementia prevention: Methodological explanations for inconsistent results. Epidemiol Rev 35–66 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. Coulibaly, B., Li, G. : Do homeowners increase consumption after the last mortgage payment? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis. Rev Econ Statist 88, 10–19 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darwin, C. : Letter to Henry Fawcett, 18 September 1861. (1861)Google Scholar
  17. Dretske, F.I. : Reasons and falsification. Philos Q 15, 20–34 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fermi, L., Bernardini, G. : Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Basic Books (1961), reprinted New York: Dover (2003)Google Scholar
  19. Feyerabend, P. : How to be a good empiricist — a plea for tolerance in matters epistemological. In: Nidditch, P.H., ed. The Philosophy of Science, New York: Oxford University Press (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Feyerabend, P. : Against Method. London: Verso. (1975)Google Scholar
  21. Fodor, J.A. : The dogma that didn’t bark. Mind 100, 201–220 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franklin, A., Howson, C. : Why do scientists prefer to vary their experiments? Stud Hist Philos Sci 15, 51–62 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, M. : A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1957)Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, M. : The Essence of Friedman. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press (1987)Google Scholar
  25. Galileo, G. : Two New Sciences (1638). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Glazer, A. : Advertising, information and prices. Econ Inquiry 19, 661–671 (1981)Google Scholar
  27. Gross, D.B., Souleles, N.S. : Do liquidity constraints and interest rates matter for consumer behavior? Evidence from credit card data. Q J Econ 117, 149–185 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruber, J. : Covering the uninsured in the United States. J Econ Lit 46, 571–606 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harré, R. : Great Scientific Experiments. London: Phaidon Press (1981), reprinted New York: Dover (2002)Google Scholar
  30. Ho, D.E., Imai, K. : Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment: The California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002. Public Opin Q 72, 216–240 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubbard, R.L., Craddock, S.G., Flynn, P.M., Anderson, J., Etheridge, R.M.: Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 11, 261–278 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kanny, D., Schieber, R.A., Pryor, V., Kresnow, M.: Effectiveness of a state law mandating use of bicycle helmets among children. Am J Epidemiol 154, 1072–1076 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn, E.M., Nie, C.L., O’Brien, M.E., Withers, R.L., Wintemute, G.J., Hargarten, S.W.: Missing the target: A comparison of buyback and fatality related guns. Inj Prev 8, 143–146 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuhn, T.: A function for thought experiments. In: Kuhn, T., The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, pages 240–265. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (1979)Google Scholar
  35. Lumey, L.H., Stein, A.D., Kahn, H.S., van der Pal-de Bruin, K.M., Blauw, G.J., Zybert, P.A., Susser, E.S. : Cohort profile: The Dutch hunger winter families study. Int J Epidemiol 36, 1196–1204 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manski, C.F., Pepper, J.V., Thomas, Y.F. (eds): Assessment of Two Cost-Effectiveness Studies on Cocaine Control Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (1999)Google Scholar
  37. McCullough, M.L., Giovannucci, E.L. : Diet and cancer prevention. Oncogene 23, 6349–6364 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mill, J.S. : A System of Logic: The Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (1867)Google Scholar
  39. Milyo, J., Waldfogel, J. : The effect of price advertising on prices: Evidence in the wake of 44 Liquormart. Am Econ Rev 89, 1081–1096 (1999)Google Scholar
  40. Mitrou, P.N., Albanes, D., Weinstein, S.J., Pietinen, P., Taylor, P.R., Virtamo, J., Leitzmann, M.F.: A prospective study of dietary calcium, dairy products and prostate cancer risk. Int J Cancer 120, 2466–2473 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neumark, D., Wascher, W. : Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Comment. Am Econ Rev 90, 1362–1396 (2000)Google Scholar
  42. Nozick, R. : Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1981)Google Scholar
  43. Park, S.Y., Murphy, S.P., Wilkens, L.R., Stram, D.O., Henderson, B.E., Kolonel, L.N.: Calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intake and prostate cancer risk — The multiethnic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 166, 1259–1269 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peirce, C.S. : The architecture of theories. In: Charles Sanders Peirce: Selected Writings. New York: Dover (1958)Google Scholar
  45. Platt, J. : Strong inference. Science 146, 347–353 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plott, C.R., Smith, V.L. (eds) : Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. New York: North Holland (2008)Google Scholar
  47. Polya, G. : Heuristic reasoning and the theory of probability. Am Math Month 48, 450–465 (1941)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. Popper, K.R. : The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row (1935 in German, 1959 in English)Google Scholar
  49. Quine, W.V.O. : What price bivalence? J Philos 8, 90–95 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rachlin, H. : Self-control: Beyond commitment (with Discussion). Behav Brain Sci 18, 109–159 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Romer, D. : Advanced Macroeconomics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2005)Google Scholar
  52. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies (with Discussion). Statist Sci 4, 259–304 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Replicating effects and biases. Am Statistician 55, 223–227 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Reasons for effects. Chance 5–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  55. Samuelson, P.A. : Schumpeter as economic theorist. In: P.A. Samuelson, Collected Papers, Volume 5, pages 201–327. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1982, 1986)Google Scholar
  56. Schatzkin, A., Gail, M. : The promise and peril of surrogate end points in cancer research. Nature Rev Cancer 2, 19–27 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sparen, P., Vagero, D., Shestov, D.B., Plavinskaja, S., Parfenova, N., Hoptiar, V., Paturot, D., Galanti, M.R. : Long term mortality after severe starvation during the siege of Leningrad: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 328, 11–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Souleles, N.S. : The response of household consumption to income tax refunds. Am Econ Rev 89, 947–958 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Staley, K.W. : Robust evidence and secure evidence claims. Philos Sci 71, 467–488. (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Surgeon General’s Advisory Committee: Smoking and Health. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand (1964)Google Scholar
  61. Stein, Z., Susser, M., Saenger, G., Marolla, F.: Nutrition and mental performance. Science 178, 708–713 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stigler, G.J.: The economics of minimum wage legislation. Am Econ Rev 36, 358–365 (1946)Google Scholar
  63. Susser, E., Hoek, H.W., Brown, A. : Neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal famine: the story of the Dutch famine study. Am J Epidemiol 147, 213–216 (1998)Google Scholar
  64. Susser, M. : Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press (1973)Google Scholar
  65. Susser, M. : Falsification, verification and causal inference in epidemiology: Reconsideration in the light of Sir Karl Popper’s philosophy. In: Susser, M., ed., Epidemiology, Health and Society: Selected Papers, pp. 82–93, New York: Oxford University Press (1987)Google Scholar
  66. Urmson, J.O.: Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell (1988)Google Scholar
  67. Weed, D.L., Hursting, S.D. : Biologic plausibility in causal inference: current method and practice. Am J Epidemiol 147, 415–425 (1998)Google Scholar
  68. Weiss, N.S.: Can the “ specificity” of an association be rehabilitated as a basis for supporting a causal hypothesis? Epidemiology 13, 6–8 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wellford, C.F., Pepper, J.V., Petrie, C.V., and the Committee to Improve Research and Data on Firearms: Firearms and Violence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2004)Google Scholar
  70. Williams, B. : Knowledge and reasons. In: Williams, B., Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, pages 47–56. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (2006)Google Scholar
  71. Wintemute, G.J., Wright, M.A., Drake, C.M., Beaumont, J.J.: Subsequent criminal activity among violent misdemeanants who seek to purchase handguns: Risk factors and effectiveness of denying handgun purchase. J Am Med Assoc 285, 1019–1026 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zellner, A. Readings in Economic Statistics and Econometrics. Boston: Little, Brown (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistics Department Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations