Anticipated Patterns of Response

  • Paul R. Rosenbaum
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS)


Design sensitivity is used to quantify the effectiveness of devices discussed in Chapter 5. Several of those devices anticipate a particular pattern of results, perhaps coherence among several outcomes, or a dose-response relationship. To what extent do these considerations reduce sensitivity to unmeasured biases?


Optimal Weight Statist Assoc Multivariate Normal Distribution Design Sensitivity Verbal Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angrist, J.D., Lavy, V. : Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Q J Econ 114, 533–575 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Heller, R., Rosenbaum, P.R., Small, D. : Split samples and design sensitivity in observational studies. J Am Statist Assoc 104, to appear (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Joreskog, K.G., Goldberger, A.S. : Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J Am Statist Assoc 70, 631–639 (1975)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Rao, C.R.: Linear Statistical Inference and Applications. New York: Wiley (1973)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Signed rank statistics for coherent predictions. Biometrics 53, 556–566 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Observational Studies (2nd edition). NY: Springer (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Does a dose-response relationship reduce sensitivity to hidden bias? Biostatistics 4, 1–10 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Design sensitivity in observational studies. Biometrika 91, 153–164 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Exact, nonparametric inference when doses are measured with random errors. J Am Statist Assoc 100, 511–518 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenbaum, P.R.: What aspects of the design of an observational study affect its sensitivity to bias from covariates that were not observed? In: Festshrift for Paul W. Holland. Princeton, NJ: ETS (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Small, D., Rosenbaum, P.R.: War and wages: The strength of instrumental variables and their sensitivity to unobserved biases. J Am Statist Assoc 103, 924–933 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Small, D.S., Rosenbaum, P.R.: Error-free milestones in error-prone measurements. Ann App Statist, to appear (2009)Google Scholar
  13. van Eeden, C. : An analogue, for signed rank statistics, of Jureckova’s asymptotic linearity theorem for rank statistics. Ann Math Statist 43, 791–802 (1972)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Wild, C.P.: Environmental exposure measurement in cancer epidemiology. Mutagenesis 24, 117–125 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistics Department Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations