Advertisement

Individual Differences in Cognition: New Methods for Examining the Personality-Cognition Link

  • William Revelle
  • Joshua Wilt
  • Allen Rosenthal
Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality book series (SSHE)

Abstract

Understanding how all people are the same, some are the same, and yet none are the same is a fundamental challenge to personality and individual differences theorists in particular and psychologists in general (Kluckhohn & Murray, 1953; Revelle, 1995). Unfortunately, there is little work that actually addresses the challenge of Kluckhohn and Murray. As is true for the rest of psychology, there is a strong trend toward fragmentation of the field of individual differences. Particularly in the United States, there is a tendency in personality and individual differences toward the lack of integration of theories of (non-cognitive) personality dimensions with individual differences in cognition. The chapters of this book are partly meant to rectify this shortcoming. We will do our part by reviewing some of the prior research on the effects of non-cognitive variables upon cognition and then introduce a new procedure, “Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment” (SAPA) as a tool for exploring cognitive and non-cognitive aspects of personality.

Keywords

Positive Affect Personality Project Music Preference Honor Thesis Lower Order Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1950). The authoritarian personality (1st ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: understanding right-wing authoritarianism (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion?: social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 245–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., & Weishaar, M. E. (1989). Cognitive therapy. In A. Freeman, K. M. Simon, L. E. Beutler, & H. Arkowitz (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy (pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohnet, I., & Croson, R. (2004). Trust and trustworthiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 443–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broadbent, D. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2002). Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in a cleaner fish mutualism. Animal Behaviour, 63(3), 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2006). Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441(7096), 975–978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, J. C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, J. D., & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607–649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Reanalysis of some color data of Helm’s by INDSCAL procedure for individual differences multidimensional scaling. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5(Pt. 1), 137–138.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach-avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2007). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust (unpublished).Google Scholar
  22. Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Readings in extraversion-introversion. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eysenck, H. J. (1973). Eysenck on extraversion. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1968). Manual for the eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  25. Eysenck, H. J., & Himmelweit, H. T. (1947). Dimensions of personality; a record of research carried out in collaboration with H.T. Himmelweit [and others]. London: K. Paul, Trench.Google Scholar
  26. Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1409–1422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraley, R. C. (2004). How to conduct behavioral research over the internet: a beginner’s guide to HTML and CGI/Perl. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilboa, E., & Revelle, W. (1994). Personality and the structure of affective responses. In S. H. M. van Goozen, N. E. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: essays on emotion theory (pp. 135–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Ben-Artzi, E., Jeczemien, P., Marom, S., & Hermesh, H. (2004). Depression impairs the ability to ignore the emotional aspects of facial expressions: evidence from the garner task. Cognition and Emotion, 18(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
  31. Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Revelle, W., & Gotlib, I. H. (2000). Stroop interference following mood induction: emotionality, mood congruence and concern relevance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(5), 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., & Cloninger, C. R. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: a commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(4), 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Grucza, R. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(2), 167–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Heller, D., Komar, J., & Lee, W. B. (2007). The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 898–910.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hofstee, W. K., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, J. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klirs, E. G., & Revelle, W. (1986). Predicting variability from perceived situational similarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(1), 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kluckhohn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality formation: the determinants. In C. Kluckhohn, H. A. Murray, & D. M. Schneider (Eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture (pp. 53–67). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  45. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leon, M. R., & Revelle, W. (1985). Effects of anxiety on analogical reasoning: a test of three theoretical models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1302–1315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewin, K., Adams, D. K., & Zener, K. E. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Lieberman, M. D., & Rosenthal, R. (2001). Why introverts can’t always tell who likes them: multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 294–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Liebert, M. (2006). A Public-Domain Assessment of Music Preferences as a Function of Personality and General Intelligence. Honors Thesis. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  50. Litle, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1986). Sensation seeking and music preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(4), 575–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2001). Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: the importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 343–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 452–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. MacLean, P. D., & Kral, V. A. (1973). A triune concept of the brain and behaviour. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  55. MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 107–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayer, R. E., Stull, A. T., Campbell, J., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., & Chun, D. (2007). Overestimation bias in self-reported SAT scores. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  58. Mineka, S., & Gilboa, E. (1998). Cognitive biases in anxiety and depression. In W. F. Flack & J. D. Laird (Eds.), Emotions in psychopathology: theory and research (pp. 216–228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mulholland, T. M., Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 252–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (2005). Effective functioning: a three level model of affect, motivation, cognition, and behavior. In J. Fellous & M. Arbib (Eds.), Who needs emotions? The brain meets the machine (pp. 173–202). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 411–422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pytlik Zillig, L. M., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral and cognitive processes represented in the big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 847–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Raven, J. (1989). The Raven Progressive Matrices: a review of national norming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the united states. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  68. Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: the structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2006). Message in a ballad: the role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17(3), 236–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical cluster-analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Revelle, W. (1986). Motivation and efficiency of cognitive performance. In D. R. Brown & J. Veroff (Eds.), Frontiers of motivational psychology: essays in honor of J. W. Atkinson (pp. 105–131). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Revelle, W. (1993). Individual differences in personality and motivation: ‘non-cognitive’ determinants of cognitive performance. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: selection, awareness, and control: a tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 346–373). New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Revelle, W. (2007). Experimental approaches to the study of personality. In R. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 37–61). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  75. Revelle, W. (2008). psych: procedures for personality and psychological research (R package version 1.0-43).Google Scholar
  76. Revelle, W., & Laun, G. (2004). Synthetic aperture personality assessment: a progress report and a proposal. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
  77. Revelle, W., & Michaels, E. J. (1976). Theory of achievement-motivation revisited – implications of inertial tendencies. Psychological Review, 83(5), 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure – alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometika, 74(1), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: the intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1284–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Robinson, M. D., Meier, B. P., & Vargas, P. T. (2005). Extraversion, threat categorizations, and negative affect: a reaction time approach to avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1397–1436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rogers, G. M., & Revelle, W. (1998). Personality, mood, and the evaluation of affective and neutral word pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1592–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schmid, J. J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skitka, L. J., & Sargis, E. G. (2006). The internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529–555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sloman, A., Chrisley, R., & Scheutz, M. (2005). The architectural basis of affective states and processes. In J. M. Fellous & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Who needs emotions? The brain meets the machine (pp. 203–244). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the differential personality questionnaire. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  87. Uziel, L. (2006). The extraverted and the neurotic glasses are of different colors. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 745–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weiler, M. A. (1992). Sensitivity to affectively valenced stimuli. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  90. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilt, J. and Revelle W. (2009). Extraversion In M. Leary and R. H. Hoyle, (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Dierences in Social Behavior, chapter 3, New York, NY; Guilford Press 27–45.Google Scholar
  92. Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Biener, L. (1970). Differences in conceptual structures of nations: an exploratory study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yoon, K. L., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2007). Threat is in the eye of the beholder: social anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(4), 839–847.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & Mineka, S. (2005). Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychological Science, 16(2), 123–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s alpha, Revelle’s beta, and McDonald’s (omega h): Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations