Skip to main content

Debates in Entrepreneurship: Opportunity Formation and Implications for the Field of Entrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research

Part of the book series: International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship ((IHSE,volume 5))

Abstract

The field of entrepreneurship has struggled since the 1970 s to define itself as a field and gain legitimacy as a valid academic area of research (Cooper, 2003). Much of the work in entrepreneurship was either theoretical or used the phenomena as a context in which to observe other theories (Alvarez & Barney, 2008). This led to a “land grab” mentality—almost a rapaciousness—regarding entrepreneurship research among many of the established disciplines—economics, sociology, organization behavior, strategy, organization theory—looking for something new to study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An opportunity is defined in this chapter as a market imperfection.

  2. 2.

     Markets are socially constructed entities.

  3. 3.

    There are several definitions of the term organizational form; we mean it in its most general sense. We view the organizational form as a distinct social entity Scott, W.R. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493–511.

References

  • Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. L. 1999. The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum, & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell: 19–33. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Mueller, S. 1982. The evolution of organizational forms: Technology, coordination, and control. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 4. Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. 2006. Organizations Evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. 2005. How entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Management, 31(5): 776–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2008. Opportunities, organizations, and entrepreneurship: Theory and debate. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3): 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Parker, S. 2006. New firm organization and the emergence of concentrated control rights: A Bayesian approach. Fisher College Center for Entrepreneurship, Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Parker, S. 2009. New firm organization and the emergence of control rights: A Bayesian approach. Academy of Management Review, 34(2): 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. 1978. Organizational Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(394): 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, J. 1997. Mapping Reality. An Evolutionary Realist Methodology for the Natural and Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, J. 2002. Updating organizational epistemology. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations: 715–732. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. 1996. Organizational ecology. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, T. 1764. An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53: 370–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H. 2002. Judgement in Managerial Decision Making (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide, A. 1992. Bootstrap finance: The art of start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 70(6): 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide, A. 1999. How Entrepreneurs Craft Strategies That Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, C. 1855. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte Freely Translated and Condensed by Harriet Martineau. New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R., & Myers, S. 1988. Principles of Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. 1994. Exploring the “Planning Fallacy”. Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3): 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf, G. 2007. Creation and pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunties: An evolutionary economics perspective. Small Business Economics, 28: 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1): 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6): 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. 1974. Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. 14: 413–463. Lasalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1982. The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castrogiovanni, G. 1996. Pre-startup planning and the survival of new small businessess: Theoretical linkages. Journal of Management, 22(6): 801–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. B. 1993. Paradigms and Conventions: Uncertainty, Decision Making and Entrepreneurship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth, E. A. 2004. Seeing What’s Next. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, R. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. 2003. Entrepreneurship: The past, the present, the future. In Z. J. Acs, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acadmey of Managment Review, 9(2): 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Shane, S. 2003. Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12): 1165–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(4): 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J. T., & Ciuchta, M. P. 2008. Selected variation: The population-level implications of multistage selection in entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3): 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. 1963. The epigenesis of political communities at the international level. The American Journal of Sociology, 68(4): 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J. O. 2002. The Systematic Search for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. 1977. Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3: 552–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D. 1999. Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Managment, 12(6): 480–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, J. W. 1983. Stratgic process research: Questions and recommendations. Academy of Management Review, 8: 565–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, J. W. 1986. The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 11(2): 280–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. 1986. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. In G. Libecap (Ed.), Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth. Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Kotha, S. 1994. Using the brain as a metaphor to model flexible production systems. Academy of Management Review, 19: 671–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloria-Palermo, S. 1999. Discovery versus creation: Implications of the Austrian view of the market process. In J. Groenewegen, & J. Vromen (Eds.), Institutions and the Evolution of Capitalism: Implications of Evolutionary Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M., Shepherd, D. A., & Griffin, D. 2006. A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52(2): 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. 1986. New Firms, An Economic Perspective. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A., & Gartner, W. B. 1988. Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3): 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R. 1975. Environmental constraints and organizational structure: A comparative analysis of rehabilitation organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and Entrepeneurship. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. 1989. Discovery, Capitalism, and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J. 1968. Philosophy of Science: The Historical Background. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N., & Cosgel, M. M. 1993. Frank knight on risk, uncertainty, and the firm: A new interpretation. Economic Inquiry, 31(3): 456–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19: 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 2002. The organizational basis of cognition and the cognitive basis of organization. In M. Augier, & J. G. March (Eds.), The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization, Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert: 147–167. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, K. D., & House, R. 1978. Paradigm development in the social sciences: A proposed research strategy. Academy of Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Michael, S. 2005. A subjectivist theory of entrepreneurship. In S. A. Alvarez, R. Agarwal, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1982. The Technology of Foolishness. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlagel.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. 1997. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22: 974–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1982. Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1997. Quasi-natural organization science. Organization Science, 8(4): 352–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1999. Toward a campbellian realist organization science. In J. Baum, & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell: 383–411. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Managment Review, 31(1): 132–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. 2007a. Risk and rationality in entrepreneurial processes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. 2007b. Risk and Rationality in Entrepreneurial Processes. Paper presented at the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal Launch, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Boston, MA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldoveanu, M. C., & Baum, J. A. C. 2002. Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E. 1997. Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Organizationn Science, 8(4): 414–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1977. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6: 36–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. G. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. 1980. An incremental approach to strategic change. The McKinsey Quarterly, Winter Issue: 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E. 1991. The evolution of new organizational forms. American Review of Sociology, 17: 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. 2003. Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. J. Acs, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Vol. I: 141–160. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1995. Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2): 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 1981. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Eckhardt, J. 2003. The individual opportunity nexus. In Z. J. Acs, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4: 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., Haverman, H. A., & Tolbert, P. S. 2005. Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 200–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 142–193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorngate, W. 1976. Possible limits in a science of social behavior. In J. H. Strickland, F. E. Aboud, and K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social Psychology in Transition: 121–139. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J. A. 1999. New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. 1994. The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. In J. Baum, & J. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Venkataraman, D., Polley, D., & Garud, R. 1989. Processes of New Business Creation in Different Organizational Settings. New York: Ballinger/Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. 1997. The distincitive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz, & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 3: 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. 2003. Foreword. In S. Shane, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. The Individual-Opportunity Nexus: xi-xii. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. 1949. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. 1984. Self-fulfilling Prophecies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon A. Alvarez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alvarez, S.A., Barney, J.B., Young, S.L. (2010). Debates in Entrepreneurship: Opportunity Formation and Implications for the Field of Entrepreneurship. In: Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics