Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship as Social Construction: A Multilevel Evolutionary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research

Part of the book series: International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship ((IHSE,volume 5))

Abstract

Organizations are social structures – patterned and relatively stable arrangements of roles and statuses – that constitute the building blocks of modern capitalist societies. Efforts to understand their emergence typically focus on the role of entrepreneurs and concentrate on the firm level. Such firm-level analyses make sense in already existing populations and communities, because most new firms follow the paths of their predecessors and survive by filling an existing niche. However, in the case of new ventures that are the first of their kind, the formation of a firm cannot be the final step. Entrepreneurs creating organizations that depart from the established order must not only create a coherent and self-sustaining entity, but must also organize with other entrepreneurs to build a new, more favorable context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W., & Clark, K. B. 1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. 1999. Organizations Evolving. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E. 2001. Who wants to be an evolutionary theorist? Journal of Management Inquiry, 10: 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, M. C. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. 1999. The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum, & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. 2001. Many are called, few are chosen: An evolutionary approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25: 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Sasaki, T. 1995. R & D Consortia in the United States and Japan. Research Policy, 24(2): 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., Staber, U. H., Zimmer, C., & Beggs, J. J. 1990. Minimalism and organizational mortality: Patterns of disbanding among U.S. trade associations, 1900–1983. In J. V. Singh (Ed.), Organizational Evolution. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Whetten, D. 1981. Making the most of simplicity: Organization sets, action sets, and networks. In P. Nystrom, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design: 385–408. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. 1993. From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. In J. Katz, & R. H. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 1: 145–195. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4): 604–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., Beckman, S. L. & Epple, D. 1990. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36(2): 140–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, E. R. 1994. Macro and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages: A comparative analysis and review with suggestions for reorientation. Advances in Strategic Management, 10B: 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., Mitchell, W., Thomas, R. E., Bennett, D. S., & Bruderer, E. 1995. Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances. Management Science, 41(9): 1493–1508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., Freeman, J. H., & Hybels, R. C. 1992. Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action: 311–347. Boston, MA, Harvard University Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. P. 1995. Telephone companies. In G. R. Carroll, & M. T. Hannan (Eds.), Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure, and Selection: 337–354. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, E. 2000. Intel: Bluetooth is Viable. Wired News. Accessed on: November 20, 2000. http://www.wired.com/news/.

  • Baum, J. R. L., Edwin, A., & Smith, K. G. 2001. A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. 1992. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Sociological Review, 57(4): 540–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluetooth. 2000. The official bluetooth website. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://www.bluetooth.com/sig/sig/sig.asp.

  • Brittain, J. 1994. Density-independent selection and community evolution. In J. A. C. Baum, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 355–378. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, J., & Wholey, D. R. 1988. Competition and coexistence in organizational communities: Population dynamics in electronic components manufacturing. In G. R. Carroll (Ed.), Ecological Models of Organization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, S. 2000. 3G Wireless: Mobility scales new height. Telecommunications. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/200010/tcs/index.html.

  • Buxbaum, P. 2000. A brave new wireless world. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://www.chiefexecutive.net/mag/158tech/1people_brave.htm.

  • Campbell, D. T. 1969. Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 14: 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. 1994. How individual and face-to-face-group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 23–38. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R. 1993. Sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4): 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. 1992. The organizational ecology of strategic groups in the American brewing industry from 1975 to 1990. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1): 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. S. 1993. Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 755–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, J. 1997. Building on Experience: A Cross-Level, Learning-Based Approach to the Design of New Firms. Canada: Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A., & Yoffie, D. B. 1998. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape and its Battle with Microsoft. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T. 1997. Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 46–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M., & Beal, B. D. 1999. The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and directions. Journal of Management, 25(3): 317–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, E. L., Argote, L., & Epple, D. 1995. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(11): 1750–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, D. L., Paul, Y., Mang, P. Y., & Frandsen, M. 1997. The quest for legitimacy: A study of biotechnology IPO’s. Paper presented at the 1997 Academy of Management meetings, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, J., & Carroll, G. R. 1983. Organizational foundings: An ecological study of the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2): 274–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, J., & Rao, M. V. H. 1994. Externalities and ecological theory: Unbundling density dependence. In J. A. C. Baum, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 255–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, J., Swaminathan, A., & Solt, M. E. 1989. Density dependence versus population dynamics: An ecological study of failings in the California wine industry. American Sociological Review, 54(2): 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W. J. Jr. 1997. More than you think: An inclusive estimate of business entries. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3): 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denrell, J. 2000. Learning, under-sampling of failure, and the myths of management. Unpublished paper, Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1–40. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmick, J., & Rothenbuhler, E. 1984. Competitive displacement in the communication industries: New media in old environments. In R. E. Rice (Ed.), The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(4): 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., & Sandelands, L. 1992. Autogenesis: A perspective on the process of organizing. Organization Science, 3(2): 230–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. W., & Handler, D. P. 1994. The misunderstood role of small business. Business Economics, 29(3): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. 1997. The legal environment of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 479–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M. 1990. The Market and Beyond: Cooperation and Competition in Information Technology Development in the Japanese System. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. 2001. Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30: 589–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. 1979. The structure of community organizational networks. Social Forces, 57(4): 1346–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R. 1994. Cooperation and competitive behaviors during the process of creative destruction. Research Policy, 23: 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. 1996. Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T., Powell, M. J., & Granfors, M. W. 1987. Minimalist organizations: Vital events in state bar associations, 1870–1930. American Sociological Review, 52(4): 456–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. H. 1987. The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836–1975. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 910–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. F., & Henry, J. 1986. Where do organizational forms come from? Sociological Forum, 1(1): 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A. 1996. Entrepreneurship and the Market Process: An Enquiry into the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4): 564–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. 1950. Human Ecology. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M. 1982. Network data versus personal accounts: The normative culture of interlocking directorates. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociology Association San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. 2000. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2): 327–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. S., & Aldrich, H. E. 1998. The second ecology: The creation and evolution of organizational communities as exemplified by the commercialization of the world wide web. In B. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hybels, R. C., Ryan, A. R., & Barley, S. R. A. 1994. Alliances, legitimation, and founding rates in the U.S. biotechnology field, 1971–1989. Unpublished paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings Dallas, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 2000. Databases for the study of entrepreneurship. In B. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth: 4. New York, JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston, MI: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblebici, H., Salancik, G., Copay, A., & King, T. 1991. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 333–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 2001. Making sense of making artefacts: Reflections on John Ziman (Ed.), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process. Evolutionary Theories in the Social Sciences. Accessed on: May 2. http://www.etss.net/: http://www.etss.net/.

  • Lohr, S. 1995. Telecommunications giants’ joint internet security quest. New York Times. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B., & Abrahamson, E. 1997. Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6): 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1982. Organizational Systematics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. 1983. The ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48(4): 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 82(3): 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., & Haunschild, P. R. 1995. Population level learning. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CTL JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24: 934–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. 1992. The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. In J. Hagan, & K. Cook (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 22: 271–298. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • MPRG. 2000. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://www.mprg.ee.vt.edu.

  • Nelson, R. R. 1994. Evolutionary theorizing about economic change. In N. Smelser, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology: 108–136. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. 1984. A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • OIT. 2000. ADSL website. Office of Information Technology. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://www.oit.duke.edu/helpdesk/adsl/5_steps.html.

  • Olson, M. Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outlook. 2000. Genome patents. The Independent. Accessed on: November 6, 2000. http://web.lexis-nexis.com.

  • Picot, A., Laub, U. D., & Schneider, D. 1989. Innovative Unternehmensgründungen: Eine Ökonomisch-Empirische Analyse. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. 1993. A status based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 829–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12: 295–336. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranger-Moore, J., Banaszak-Holl, J., & Hannan, M. T. 1991. Density-dependent dynamics in regulated industries: Founding rates of banks and life insurance companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1):36–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, M. 1989. Assessing the emergence of new technologies: The case of compound semiconductors. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies: 439–464. New York and Ballinger: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, L. A. 2001. Initiating new organizational forms: The case of charter schools in the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Unversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. 1999. National panel study of U.S. business start-ups: First annual overview. Entrepreneurial Research Consortium. Babson College, Wellesely, MA. Accessed on: 15 August, 1999. http://projects.isr.umich.edu/psed/History.htm.

  • Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., Bygrave, W., Camp, M., & Autio, E. 2000. Global entrepreneurship monitor: Global executive report. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Accessed on: November 20, 2000. http://www.ncoe.org/research/RE-026.pdf.

  • Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, M. 1999. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Executive Report. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., & White, S. B. 1997. The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins-Roth, C. 1998. Will biotech come back? Forbes (September 7) 214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E. 1989. Organization birth and population variety: A community perspective on origins. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 11: 211–246. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. L. 1994. The coevolution of technology and organization. In J. A. C. Baum, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 403–424. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. 2002. Don’t go to strangers: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation in the formation of organizational founding teams. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, W., Singh, J. V., & Amburgey, T. L. 1991. Modeling the creation of new biotechnology firms, 1973–1987. In J. L. Wall, & L. R. Jauch (Eds.), Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings 1991. Miami Beach, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. 1996. Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. 2000. Toward sharing the genome. Technology Review (Sep–Oct): 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staber, U. H., & Aldrich, H. E. 1983. Trade association stability and public policy. In R. Hall, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Organization Theory and Public Policy: 163–178. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 142–193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C., & Edelman, L. B. 1996. Legal rational myths: The new institutionalism and the law and society tradition. Law and Social Inquiry, 21(4): 903–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2): 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. 1994. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, D. L. 1988. Professionalism, variation, and organizational survival. American Sociological Review, 53(3): 380–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Murmann, J. P. 1998. Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20: 231–266. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. 1975. A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6): 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. 1991. A systems framework for studying the process of entrepreneurship. Paper presented at a conference on Theories of Entrepreneurship, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana Champaign-Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. 1991. Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. 1993. Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. In R. Burgelman, & R. Rosenbloom (Eds.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, Vol. 5: 1–46. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Venkataraman, S., Polley, D., & Garud, R. 1988. Processes of new business creation in different organizational settings. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: 222–297. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshitake, D. 1997. ISPs hold on to their market. Accessed on February 13. http://www.news.com.

  • Zelizer, V. A. 1978. Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19th-century America. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3): 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. Ed. 2000. Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. B. 1982. Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies: The case of nuclear power. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2): 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5): 726–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. 1989. Combining institutional theory and population ecology: No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review, 54(4): 542–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zymogenetics. 2000. Novo nordisk completes private placement of shares in ZymoGenetics. Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe. Accessed on November 6, 2000. http://web.lexis-nexis.com.

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Linda Renzulli, Scott Shane, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard E. Aldrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aldrich, H.E., Martinez, M.A. (2010). Entrepreneurship as Social Construction: A Multilevel Evolutionary Approach. In: Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics