Advertisement

Industry and Knowledge Clusters

  • Thomas Andersson
  • Martin G. Curley
  • Piero Formica
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

Clusters can be likened to the living organisms in the rainforest populated by a vast number of species with wide range, such as the parasite, the predator, the symbiont, and the table companion, which will be described in the following paragraph. In the rainforest internal design, which means relationships, is what is valuable. The quality of relationships in a cluster is heavily affected by social capital, which tends to reflect the special characteristics of a particular cluster community in terms of mores, manners, and in the hearts and minds of those who live in it. Social capital thus differs from cluster to cluster, and each cluster is unique – as is the case in a rainforest, where only one of two identical organisms survives. Clusters are “one-of-a-kind,” and not “one-size-fits-all,” living organisms.

Keywords

Social Capital Industrial District Nascent Entrepreneur Entrepreneurial Education Growth Pole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amidon D (2002) The innovation superhighway. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson T, Hansson E, Schwaag-Serger S, Sörvik J (2004) The cluster policies whitebook. IKED, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson T, Jacobsson A, Mossberg A, Sörvik J (2006) Enabling trust in the digital world, exploring the market for authentication technologies in international digital transactions. IKED and GTC, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  6. Carayannis EG, Piero Formica P (eds) (2008) Knowledge matters: technology, innovation and entrepreneurship in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative, socio-technical systems approach in the US, Europe and Asia. Palgrave MacMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis EG, Sipp C (2005) e-Development towards the knowledge economy. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carayannis EG, von Zedtwitz M (2005) Architecting GloCal (Global–Local), real–virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies. Technovation 25:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (eds) (2006) Re-discovering Schumpeter. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet felling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organisational culture on work processes and outcomes. Adm Sci Q 43:749–781Google Scholar
  11. Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Downe L, Mui C (2000) Unleashing the killer app – digital strategies for market dominance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Drucker P (1993c) Post-capitalist society. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Edvinsson L (2002) Corporate longitude. Navigating the knowledge economy. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Eustace C (ed) (2003) THE PRISM REPORT 2003. Research findings and policy recommendations. European Commission Information Society Technologies Programme, Report Series No.2, October, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. Feynman RP (1999) The pleasure of finding things out. The best short works of Feynman, R. P. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Formica P (2003a) Industry and knowledge clusters: principles, practices, policy. Tartu University Press, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladwell M (1999) Clicks and mortar – Don’t believe the Internet hype: the real e-commerce revolution happened off-line. Annals of Retail, December 6Google Scholar
  20. Horibe F (2002) KM and innovation: can they thrive together? Knowl Manage Rev 5(2):18–21Google Scholar
  21. Jeffry T (1999) America’s entrepreneurial revolution: the demise of brontosaurus capitalism. Babson College, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Kauffman S (1995) At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organisation and complexity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Kay J (1995) Foundations of corporate success. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly K (1998) New rules for the new economy. Fourth Estate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin R, Sunley P (2002) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Paper presented at the high technology small firms one-day clusters conference, Manchester Business School, 18 AprilGoogle Scholar
  26. Nairn G (2000) Winds of change sweep through the marketplace. Connectis July(Issue 4):11–17Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2002) Conference on the measurement of social capital, Rapporteur’s summary, London, 25–27 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD-DATAR (2001) Local networks of enterprises in the world economy: sixteen forums, Paris, January 23−24Google Scholar
  29. OECD/Government of Canada (2003) The opportunity and challenge of diversity: a role for social capital? Synthesis report, international conference, Montreal, Québec, 23–25 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  30. Perroux F (1950) Economic space: theory and applications. Q J Econ 64:89–104Google Scholar
  31. Perroux F (1955) Note sur la Notion de Pôle de Croissance. Economie Appliquée 7:307–320Google Scholar
  32. Smith VL (2000) Bargaining and market behaviour. Essays in experimental economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanford X (2002) Social capital and innovation analysis. Case study of the E100 network: foundations and assessment overview. KnowMap 2(2). http://www.knowmap.com
  34. Storper M (1995) The resurgence of regional economics, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur Urban Reg Stud 2(3):191–221Google Scholar
  35. Tapscott D, Lowy A, Ticoll D (1998) Blueprint to the digital economy. Creating wealth in the era of e-business. Mc-Graw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. US National Commission on Entrepreneurship (2001a) Building entrepreneurial networks, Washington, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  37. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42(1):35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeldin T (1994) An intimate history of humanity. Sinclair-Stevenson, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Andersson
    • 1
  • Martin G. Curley
    • 2
  • Piero Formica
    • 3
  1. 1.Jönköping Int. Business School, Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Intel Corporation and National University of IrelandMaynoothIreland
  3. 3.Jönköping University International Entrepreneurship AcademyBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations