New Dimensions in Diagnostic Imaging of the Aorta

  • Jean Bismuth
  • Christof Karmonik
  • Dipan Shah
  • Mark G. Davies
  • Alan B. Lumsden


First surgical applications of X-ray imaging can be traced back as early as to the Spanish-American war in 1898, where Elizabeth Fleischmann (San Francisco) was recognized by the surgeon general of the United States for using images (film plates) obtained under different exposure angles, to triangulate pieces of shrapnel in the body of her patients [1]. In the 1920s, the first patents were issued for imaging a single plane or slice of the human body, soon called tomographs (tomos (greek): section or cut and graphein: to write) and the first instrument was built in 1931 [1]. In 1928, Jean Kieffer, a French Immigrant, devised the design of an X-ray apparatus that would yield a sharp image of the region of interest with the surrounding areas blurred out. The first such device, named the Kieffer laminagaph, was not built until 1937. With the help of others it was developed at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University in St. Louis, [1].

With the advent of the minicomputers in the late 1970s, the modality of computed tomography was born. Pioneers of this area were Sir Godfrey Hounsfield (EMI, Central Research UK) and Allan McLeod Comack (Tufts University, USA). Both shared the Nobel Prize in Medicine (1979) for their discoveries. The original 1971 prototype took 160 readings in a range of 180, where each reading (or scan) took a few minutes. Algebraic reconstruction algorithms then took 2.5 h to compute the final image [2].


Computational Fluid Dynamic Aortic Dissection Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation False Lumen Acute Aortic Dissection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kevles BH (1997) Naked to the bone. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Filller A (2009) The history, development and impact of computed imaging in neurological diagnosis and neurosurgery: CT, MRI and DTI. Nature precedings, vol. doi:10.1038/ npre.2009.3267.2: Posted 22 May 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Suzuki T, Oh JK, Moore AG, Malouf JF, Pape LA, Gaca C, Sechtem U, Lenferink S, Deutsch HJ, Diedrichs H, Marcos y Robles J, Llovet A, Gilon D, Das SK, Armstrong WF, Deeb GM, Eagle KA (2000) The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283:897–903Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clouse WD et al. (2004) Acute aortic dissection: Population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc 79:176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirst AE Jr, Johns VJ Jr, Kime Jr SW (1958) Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: a review of 505 cases, Medicine (Baltimore) 37:217–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eagle KA, DeSanctis RW (1989) Aortic dissection. Curr Probl Cardiol 14:225–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamalakannan D, Rosman HS, Eagle KA (2007) Acute aortic dissection. Crit Care Clin 23;779–800, viGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA, Myrmel T, Meinhardt G, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Suzuki T, Fattori R, Llovet A, Froehlich J, Hutchison S, Distante A, Sundt T, Beckman J, Januzzi JL Jr, Isselbacher EM, Eagle KA (2007) Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 357:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Mehta RH, Richartz BM, Evangelista A, Petzsch M, Cooper JV, Januzzi JL, Ince H, Sechtem U, Bossone E, Fang J, Smith DE, Isselbacher EM, Pape LA, Eagle KA (2004) Gender-related differences in acute aortic dissection. Circulation 109:3014–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pitt MP, Bonser RS (1997) The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysm disease: an overview. J Card Surg 12:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akin I, Kische S, Ince H, Nienaber CA (2009) Indication, timing and results of endovascular treatment of type B dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37(3):289–296. Epub 2009 Jan 25Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chemelli-Steingruber IE (2009) Evaluation of volumetric measurements in patients with acute type B aortic dissection–thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs conservative. J Vasc Surg 49(1):20–28. Epub 2008 Nov 4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feezor RJ, Martin TD, Hess PJ Jr, Beaver TM, Klodell CT, Lee WA (2009) Early outcomes after endovascular management of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 49(3):561–566; discussion 566–567Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim RP, Shapiro M, Wang EY, Law M, Babb JS, Rueff LE, Jacob JS, Kim S, Carson RH, Mulholland TP, Laub G, Hecht EM (2008) 3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1847–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minami H, Sugimoto T, Okada M (1999) Evaluation of acute aortic dissection by cine-MRI. Kobe J Med Sci 45:1–11Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    King KF, Berstein MA, Zhou XJ (2004) Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier/ Academic, Amsterdam/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weston SJ, Wood NB, Tabor G, Gosman AD, Firmin DN (1998) Combined MRI and CFD analysis of fully developed steady and pulsatile laminar flow through a bend. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1158–11571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karmonik C, Bismuth JX, Davies MG, Lumsden AB (2008) Computational hemodynamics in the human aorta: a computational fluid dynamics study of three cases with patient-specific geometries and inflow rates. Technol Health Care 16:343–354Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Rourke MJ, McCullough JP (2008) A comparison of the measured and predicted flowfield in a patient-specific model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 222: 737–750Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scotti CM, Jimenez J, Muluk SC, Finol EA (2008) Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 11:301–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tokuda Y, Song MH, Ueda Y, Usui A, Akita T, Yoneyama S, Maruyama S (2008) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of blood flow in the aortic arch during cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steinman DA (2002) Image-based computational fluid dynamics modeling in realistic arterial geometries. Ann Biomed Eng 30:483–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karmonik C, Yen C, Grossman RG, Klucznik R, Benndorf G (2009) Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:479–485; discussion 485Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karmonik C, Klucznik R, Benndorf G (2008) Comparison of velocity patterns in an AComA aneurysm measured with 2D phase contrast MRI and simulated with CFD. Technol Health Care 16:119–128Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karmonik C, Klucznik R, Benndorf G (2008) Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics – preliminary experience. Rofo 180:209–215Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karmonik C, Bismuth JX, Davies MG, H. K. Y., Lumsden AB An image processing algorithm for the in-vivo quantification and visualization of septum motion in Type III B – Aortic dissections with cine magnetic resonance imaging, in EMBC 2009, Minneapolis, 2009Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wedding KL, Draney MT, Herfkens RJ, Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Pelc NJ (2002) Measurement of vessel wall strain using cine phase contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Draney MT, Herfkens RJ, Hughes TJ, Pelc NJ, Wedding KL, Zarins CK, Taylor CA (2002) Quantification of vessel wall cyclic strain using cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 30:1033–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Draney MT, Arko FR, Alley MT, Markl M, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ, Zarins CK, Taylor CA (2004) Quantification of vessel wall motion and cyclic strain using cine phase contrast MRI: in vivo validation in the porcine aorta. Magn Reson Med 52:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Bismuth
    • 1
  • Christof Karmonik
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dipan Shah
    • 1
  • Mark G. Davies
    • 1
  • Alan B. Lumsden
    • 1
  1. 1.The Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.The Methodist Hospital Neurological InstituteHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations