Advertisement

Design for Additive Manufacturing

  • Ian Gibson
  • David W. Rosen
  • Brent Stucker

Abstract

Design for manufacture and assembly (DFM) has typically meant that designers should tailor their designs to eliminate manufacturing difficulties and minimize manufacturing, assembly, and logistics costs. However, the capabilities of additive manufacturing technologies provide an opportunity to rethink DFM to take advantage of the unique capabilities of these technologies. As we will cover in Chap. 14, several companies are now using AM technologies for production manufacturing. For example, Siemens, Phonak, Widex, and the other hearing aid manufacturers use selective laser sintering and stereolithography machines to produce hearing aid shells, Align Technology uses stereolithography to fabricate molds for producing clear dental braces (“aligners”), and Boeing and its suppliers use selective laser sintering to produce ducts and similar parts for F-18 fighter jets. For hearing aids and dental aligners, AM machines enable manufacturing of tens to hundreds of thousands of parts; where each part is uniquely customized based upon person-specific geometric data. In the case of aircraft components, AM technology enables low volume manufacturing, easy integration of design changes and, at least as importantly, piece part reductions to greatly simplify product assembly.

The unique capabilities of AM technologies enable new opportunities for customization, very significant improvements in product performance, multifunctionality, and lower overall manufacturing costs. These unique capabilities include: shape complexity, in that it is possible to build virtually any shape; hierarchical complexity, in that hierarchical multiscale structures can be designed and fabricated from the microstructure through geometric mesostructure (sizes in the millimeter range) to the part-scale macrostructure; material complexity, in that material can be processed one point, or one layer, at a time; and functional complexity, in that fully functional assemblies and mechanisms can be fabricated directly using AM processes. These capabilities will be expanded upon in Sect. 11.4.

Keywords

Particle Swarm Optimization Material Composition Mass Customization Selective Laser Sinter Unique Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Susman GI (1992) Integrating design and manufacturing for competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bralla JG (ed) (1986) Handbook of product design for manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (1994) Product design for manufacture and assembly. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah J, Wright PK (2000) Developing theoretical foundations of DFM. ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Baltimore, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen DW, Chen Y, Sambu S, Allen JK, Mistree F (2003) The rapid tooling testbed: a distributed design-for-manufacturing system. Rapid Prototyping J 9(3):122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    3D Systems, Inc. http://www.3dsystems.com
  7. 7.
    Hague RJM (2006) Unlocking the design potential of rapid manufacturing. In: Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (eds) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age,  Chap. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
  8. 8.
    Mavroidis C, DeLaurentis KJ, Won J, Alam M (2002) Fabrication of non-assembly mechanisms and robotic systems using rapid prototyping. ASME J Mech Des 123:516–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kataria A, Rosen DW (2001) Building around inserts: methods for fabricating complex devices in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping J 7(5):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Binnard M (1999) Design by composition for rapid prototyping, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Norwell, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patil L, Dutta D, Bhatt AD, Lyons K, Jurrens K, Pratt MJ, Sriram RD (2000) Representation of heterogeneous objects in ISO 10303 (STEP). Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Mechanical Engineering Division Orlando, FL, November, pp 355–364Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boeing Corp. http://www.boeing.com
  13. 13.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashby MF, Evans A, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 49(8):1747–1769CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Evans AG, Dharmasena K, Wadley HNG (2003) On the performance of truss panels with Kagome cores. Int J Solids Struct 40:6981–6988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang A-J, McDowell DL (2003) Optimization of a metal honeycomb sandwich beam-bar subjected to torsion and bending. Int J Solids Struct 40(9):2085–2099CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang H, Rosen DW (2002) Parametric modeling method for truss structures. ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2002/CIE-34495, Montreal, 29 Sept–2 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen DW (2007) Computer-aided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Comput Aided Des Appl 4(5):585–594Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kytannen J (2006) Rapid manufacture for the retail industry. In: Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (eds) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age,  Chap. 18. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
  21. 21.
    Rapid Manufacturing Research Group, Loughborough University, UK. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/mm/research/rapid-manufacturing/index.html
  22. 22.
    Beaman JJ, Atwood C, Bergman TL, Bourell D, Hollister S, Rosen D (2004) Assessment of European Research and Development in Additive/Subtractive Manufacturing, final report from WTEC panel. see: http://wtec.org/additive/report/welcome.htm
  23. 23.
    Ensz M, Storti D, Ganter M (1998) Implicit methods for geometry creation. Int J Comput Geom Appl 8(5,6):509–536Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (1999) Meshfree simulation of deforming domains. Comput Aided Des 31(7):459–471CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeid I (2005) Mastering CAD/CAM. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rvachev VL, Sheiko TI, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2001) Transfinite interpolation over implicitly defined sets. Comput Aided Geom Des 18:195–220CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Michell AGM (1904) The limits of economy of material in frame structures. Philos Mag 8:589–597CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dewhurst P, Srithongchai S (2005) An Investigation of minimum-weight dual-material symmetrically loaded wheels and torsion arms. ASME J Appl Mech 72:196–202CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watts DM, Hague RJ (2006) Exploiting the design freedom of RM. Proc Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp, Austin, TX, 14–16 Aug, pp 656–667Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1942–1948.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fourie PC, Groenwold AA (2002) The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Özisik MN, Orlande HRB (2000) Inverse heat transfer. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vettering WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in C,  Chap. 15, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  34. 34.
    Chu J (2009) Design synthesis for morphing 3D cellular structures. MS thesis, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chu J, Engelbrecht S, Graf G, Rosen DW (2009) A comparison of synthesis methods for cellular structures with application to additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J (in press)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Graf GC (2009) Development of specialized base primitives for meso-scale conforming truss structures. MS thesis, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Gibson
    • 1
  • David W. Rosen
    • 2
  • Brent Stucker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Production EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical & Aerospace EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations